Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Banking royal commission http://www.abc.net.au/news/story-streams/banking-royal-commission/ Visit the page above and select one of the ASX listed companies being investigated by the Banking Royal...

1 answer below »
Banking royal commission
http:
www.abc.net.au/news/story-streams
anking-royal-commission
Visit the page above and select one of the ASX listed companies being investigated by the Banking Royal Commission (for example AMP, BankWest, Suncorp for example, any but the Commonwealth Bank) and develop an ethical question based on an issue of your choice (for example: how people have been charged bank fees for an extended period of time after their passing, or how some funeral insurers have been operating and charging people), after that you need to analyse the topic/company using the structure/ Marking Criteria provided in this document, as a summary see the three points below:
a) Use stakeholder theory (chapter 3, Lecture 4)
) Provide arguments based on a “sufficient number” of theories of Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and/ or Creating Shared Value (CSV) to justify or criticise the actions and decisions taken while under the control of the board of directors.
c) Analyse these decisions and actions using ethical as well as justice and economic distribution theories.
We expect that you demonstrate a well-developed ability to use critical thinking when analysing the topic and that you demonstrate an advanced understanding of business concepts. You will also need to thoroughly research the topic independently and finally present your findings in a professional manner using a report format.
BUS320 ASSESSMENT TASK3
    Criteria
    Section Marks
    Comments
    Executive Summary and Introduction
    ____/5
    Ex Summ = Purpose, Key findings and Recommendations.
Introduction = Authorisation and Purpose, Scope, Limitations (if any) and method.
    Background and ethical question.
    ____/10
    You have provided an informative background that captures the reader’s interest.
Good balance of news references that explain well your chosen topic.
Your ethical question does not represent “a priori” judgement
    Corporate Governance, CSR, CSV and Corporate Social Performance.
    ____/15
    Sound use of Corporate Governance Theoretical views.
The corporate social performance cube has been used to demonstrate that we all do good and bad things. The issue in the social environment axis has been modified.
Porter and Kramer’s Creating Shared Value concept has been discussed.
Use of CSR to link to the next section.
    Stakeholder Analysis.
    ____/15
    You have used the 5 questions as depicted on the text book.
Analysis using the 5 questions is comprehensive
    Corporate Governance Discussion based on ASX 2010 Principles and recommendations.
    ____/15
    You have identified the level of Board Independence, board formation and diversity.
Your analysis of the corporation actions using ASX or OECD is good.
    Ethical analysis.
    ____/15
    You have analysed the ethical question from a normative (consequentialist / non- consequentialist) perspective
You have analysed the ethical question from the perspective of justice and economic distribution using libertarian and Rawls approaches.
Which factors constitute justice? You have discussed this issue.
    Recommendations.
    ____/10
    3 or 4 Action driven and well-reasoned recommendations
    Literature support and argument, logical and engaging. Critical evaluation and logical development of arguments supported by relevant credible sources and appropriate ref. style.
    ____/15
    Your use of the literature is pertinent and provides support for your ideas (at least 10 refereed, peer reviewed articles and sufficient news articles, videos etc.)
Your writing style is well developed.
Your argument is good and logical
The referencing style in text and in the LoR is appropriate and follows Harvard referencing style.
    TOTAL
    ____/2
    ___/50
    Please contact your tutor if you need any further feedback.
Answered Same Day Oct 08, 2020 BUS320 University of the Sunshine Coast

Solution

Csassignment answered on Oct 10 2020
142 Votes
BUS320 ASSESSMENT TASK3
Executive summary
This assignment is focused on the discussion of the ethical issue which has risen recently in front of Westpac banking corporation. In this assignment, the stakeholder theory has been used and the arguments on the basis of the sufficient number of theories of corporate social responsibility and corporate governance have been provided and the actions were taken by the company’s board directors have been evaluated and analyzed using the ethical as well as economical and justice distribution theories.
Contents
Executive summary    2
Introduction    4
Ethical case: Westpac banking corporation hit with $35 million penalty for settling the i
esponsible home loan with the Australian securities and investment commission.    5
Ethical questions    6
“Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance”    7
Corporate governance theories    7
Corporate social performance    8
Creating shared value    9
Stakeholder Analysis    9
“Discussion of corporate governance based on the ASX 2010 Principles and recommendations”    10
Level of board independence and Formation of board and diversity    11
Ethical analysis    12
Recommendation    14
Conclusion    15
Introduction
The banking industry is of supreme importance for both society and the economy. Thus, it is important that banks comply with all the rules, laws and regulations which are framed by the government for enhancing the confidence of the society and for ensuring the soundness of the operations. They should ensure equitable and fair treatment to all the stakeholders. The stakeholder’s interest may or may not coincide with each other. The conflict of interest should be ethically balanced by the banks by keeping in view the greatest good of most of the members. Further, the banks have the responsibility of ensuring truthful, full & translucent disclosure of the financial health and they should behave as the socially responsible corporate citizen.
Selected organization: Westpac banking corporation
Ethical case: Westpac banking corporation hit with $35 million penalty for settling the i
esponsible home loan with the Australian securities and investment commission.
The Westpac banking corporation hit with the thirty-five million dollar penalty in order to settle the reckless home loan cases with the Australian securities and investments commission. The company has reached the settlement with the commercial regulator. The company has admitted that their automated loan assessment system
each responsible lending law, issues more than ten thousand home loans which should not have been approved automatically. As a result, the bank has to pay the civil penalty and regulator legal cost of $35 million for settling the case. The commission has reported that this is the largest civil penalty which has been awarded to any bank under the national credit act. The banking corporation has admitted that they the household expenditure measure have been used by them which is a relatively less estimate of basic living expenses for calculating the living cost of potential buyers. The bank should actually evaluate the declared living expenses of the customers instead of using household expenditure measure. The bank admitted that this practice
eaches the “national consumer credit protection act”. This indicates that the affected customers who were approved for the home loans cannot potentially afford to repay the loans without any financial hardship.
This case was launched by the Australian securities and investment commission in March last year by using seven cases for demonstrating that the bank is using lower household expenditure measure benchmark instead of higher declared living expenses of customers (Koslowski, 2011). In addition to this, the Westpac banking corporation is also exposed to the potential lawsuits over the billion dollars in i
esponsible home loans.     
The ASIC has also suspected that the bank does not properly assess whether the interest-only bo
ower of the bank will be able to manage to pay for their mortgage without any financial difficulty in future when the interest-only period will end & both the interest & principle payment has to be made by the customers. The interest and principle payment can add up to as much as the forty percent of the monthly repayment on the mortgage.
Ethical questions
The ethics and competitive advantage has the symbiotic relationship. The ethical practices help the banks in acquiring the
and reputation. This further helps the banks in expanding the customer and ultimately in increasing overall income. The good reputation usually attracts the ethically conscious client which solves the problem of nonperforming loans to a high extent. In addition to this, the bank that is well known for ethical conduct is able to retain and attract honest and
ight employees (Paulet, 2011). It will make it easier for banks to raise additional capital in a cost-effective manner when needed.
In the present situation, the Westpac banking corporation hits the penalty because of the i
esponsible home loans. The bank approves the loans to the customers which they could not potentially afford and the bank was also accused of the nonassessment of the long-term viability of interest only loans of the customers (Villa, 2015). The bank uses a lower household expenditure benchmark for determining the basic living expenses of the customers which
each the national Consumer Credit Protection Act.
The major ethical question which arises in this situation is how the Westpac banking corporation does not make proper use of information technology and engage in financing activities which were unsuitable for the customers. The basic ethical issue which arises in this situation is that the bank has provided the credits to the customers which cannot be paid by them without any financial hardship in the near future.
“Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility, and corporate social performance”
Corporate governance theories
Corporate governance has become the major concern for the customers. There are several theories of corporate governance such as the “agency theory, stewardship theory, stakeholder theory, resource dependence theory, transaction cost theory, political theory, and sociological theory”. These theories provide the...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here