Solution
Nishtha answered on
Apr 27 2021
Running Head:APPLE 1
APPLE 3
A REVIEW OF APPLE
Table of Contents
Introduction 3
Conclusion 5
References 6
Introduction
In protest of the lack of intervention taken as a result of the leaks, a former Apple contractor who had blow the whistle on the company's programme to access to consumers' Siri recordings has gone public. “It is alarming that Apple (and, without a doubt, not just Apple) continues to ignore and violate fundamental rights and maintains their huge data collection,” Thomas le Bonniec wrote in a letter to all European data protection authorities explaining his decision. "With European citizens being told that the EU has one of the toughest data security laws in the world, he was highly wo
ied that big tech firms are effectively wiretapping entire populations." It is not enough to pass a law; it must be implemented against privacy violators.” Le Bonniec served as a subcontractor for Apple in Cork, transcribing user requests in English and French until he left in the summer of 2019 due to ethical issues about the job. He told the Guardian at the time, "They do work in an ethical and practical grey area, and they've been doing something on a massive scale for years." They should be screamed at in every way possible. Following Le Bonniec's and his colleagues' disclosures, Apple vowed major improvements to its "scoring" scheme, which included thousands of contractors listened to recordings made by Siri, both inadvertently and intentionally. The company apologised, vowed to
ing the work in-house, and only grade videos from users who had expressly consented to the practise. In an August statement, the company said, "We realise we have not been entirely living up to our great standards." In late October, Apple finally released a software update that enabled people to turn or out of having their audio recordings used to "improve Siri dictation," as well as delete the recordings that Apple had saved.
Every day, Le Bonniec listened to hundreds of recordings on different Apple computers. These recordings were sometimes made without Siri being enabled, for example, in the sense of a user's actual intention to trigger it for a request. These processing were ca
ied out behind the users' backs and collected into datasets in order to co
ect the interpretation of the device's recording. The recordings weren't really restricted to Apple device users; family, children, friends, coworkers, and anyone else who could be captured by the device were all included. Names, emails, texts, searches, complaints, ambient sounds, videos, and interactions were all captured by the machine. He overheard people discussing their cancer, deceased families, faith, sexuality, gambling, politics, education, relationships, or drugs without any purpose of activating Siri. These activities are obviously at odds with the company's "privacy-driven" policies, and data security authorities and security watchdog groups should look into them immediately. With this comment, I want to
ing this issue to your attention, as well as give my assistance in providing any evidence that supports these facts. Despite the fact that this case has already been made public, Apple has not been the target of any inquiry to my...