Page 4 of 7
Page 4 of 7
applied the law
appropriately
(20 marks)
added their
individual remark.
have added their
individual remark.
group members
have added their
individual remark.
have added their
individual remark.
their individual
emark.
Clarity of
Expression (10
marks)
Writing lacks
clarity and
coherence. Points
have not been
paraphrased well.
There are many
e
ors in spelling,
grammar, and
punctuation.
.
Writing is generally
clear with some
lapses in
coherence. Some
points have been
paraphrased well.
There are some
e
ors in spelling,
grammar, and
punctuation.
Writing is clear and
coherent. Most
points have been
paraphrased well.
There are some
e
ors in spelling,
grammar, and
punctuation.
Writing shows
good clarity and
cohesion. Points
have been
paraphrased well.
There are few
e
ors in spelling,
grammar, and
punctuation.
Writing shows
excellent clarity and
cohesion. Points have
een skilfully
paraphrased. There
are no or very few
e
ors in spelling,
grammar, and
punctuation.
Reference and
Formatting
(10 marks)
Assignment mostly
failed to adhere to
APIC Harvard style
of referencing.
Assignment only
show some
adherence to APIC
Harvard style of
eferencing.
Assignment mostly
adheres to APIC
Harvard style of
eferencing.
With few
inconsistencies,
Assignment mostly
completely adheres
to APIC assessment
presentation
guidelines with few
inconsistencies with
APIC Harvard style
of referencing.
Assignment completely
adheres to APIC
Harvard style of
eferencing.
.
Assessment 3: Essay and Presentation
Due date: Week 11 (Assignment submission) and week 12(Presentation)
Group/individual: Individual
Word count / Time provided: 2000 words
Weighting: 40% (25% submission and 15% presentation)
Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO-1, ULO-2, ULO-4,
Assignment details:
The Essay Assessment requires students to demonstrate their knowledge of the
Australian business law, concepts, and rules. To successfully answer the questions, the
analysis, the discussions, and examinations of topics must be supported by the relevant
sections of the law, cases, examples, journal articles and books. For this Assessment,
students must answer four questions. You are expected to write about 500 words for
each question, and total of 2000 words for Assessment 3.
Essay Questions
1. By giving at least four different examples, explain the different business
structures. To completely answer this question, you must define each business
structure, explain the legal requirements to establish each business structure
and explain the differences between each business structures.
2. Examine the legal protections provided under the Australian Consumer Law
for consumers. To completely answer this question, you are required to
Page 5 of 7
Page 5 of 7
support your discussion with the relevant sections of the law and provide
elevant court cases that show the legal protections provided under Australian
Consumer Law.
3. Identify the essential elements that should be fulfilled to have a valid contract,
and by giving relevant examples, elaborate the available remedies if there is
each of a contract. To completely answer this question, you need to support
your answer with the relevant sections of the law and relevant examples.
4. Discuss the different aspects of legal risks of doing business. You can answer
this question from the perspective of negligence, tort, business crimes and
usiness ethics.
You will make a presentation on the main points of your answers for the Essay questions. The
presentation must show the main findings and you have 10 minutes to complete the presentation, and
5 minutes to answer questions.
Marking Criteria and Ru
ic: The assessment (Written submission and presentation combined) will
e marked out of 100 and will be weighted 40% of the total unit mark.
Marking
Criteria
Not satisfactory
(0-49%) of the
criterion mark)
Satisfactory
(50-64%) of the
criterion mark
Good
(65-74%) of the
criterion mark
Very Good
(75-84%) of the
criterion mark
Excellent
(85-100%) of the
criterion mark
Analysis and
accuracy of
answer –
demonstrated
knowledge (20
marks)
Question 1
Demonstrated
Inadequate and
poor
understanding of
Australian Business
Law concepts and
their practical
application
Demonstrated
easonable
understanding of
Australian Business
Law concepts and
their practical
application with
necessary
adjustments.
Demonstrated
good
understanding of
Australian Business
Law concepts and
their practical
application with
necessary
adjustments.
Demonstrated very
good
understanding of
Australian Business
Law concepts and
their practical
application with
necessary
adjustments.
Demonstrated
exceptional
understanding of
Australian Business
Law concepts and
their practical
application with
necessary
adjustments.
Analysis and
accuracy of
answer –
demonstrated
knowledge (20
marks)
Question 2
Demonstrated
Inadequate and
poor
understanding of
Australian Business
Law concepts and
their practical
application
Demonstrated
easonable
understanding of
Australian Business
Law concepts and
their practical
application with
necessary
adjustments.
Demonstrated
good
understanding of
Australian Business
Law concepts and
their practical
application with
necessary
adjustments.
Demonstrated very
good
understanding of
Australian Business
Law concepts and
their practical
application with
necessary
adjustments.
Demonstrated
exceptional
understanding of
Australian Business
Law concepts and
their practical
application with
necessary
adjustments.
Analysis and
accuracy of
answer –
demonstrated
knowledge (20
marks)
Question 3
Demonstrated
Inadequate and
poor
understanding of
Australian Business
Law concepts and
their practical
application
Demonstrated
easonable
understanding of
Australian Business
Law concepts and
their practical
application with
Demonstrated
good
understanding of
Australian Business
Law concepts and
their practical
application with
Demonstrated very
good
understanding of
Australian Business
Law concepts and
their practical
application with
Demonstrated
exceptional
understanding of
Australian Business
Law concepts and
their practical
application with
Page 6 of 7
Page 6 of 7
necessary
adjustments.
necessary
adjustments.
necessary
adjustments.
necessary
adjustments.
Analysis and
accuracy of
answer –
demonstrated
knowledge (20
marks)
Question 4
Demonstrated
Inadequate and
poor
understanding of
Australian Business
Law concepts and
their practical
application
Demonstrated
easonable
understanding of
Australian Business
Law concepts and
their practical
application with
necessary
adjustments.
Demonstrated
good
understanding of
Australian Business
Law concepts and
their practical
application with
necessary
adjustments.
Demonstrated very
good
understanding of
Australian Business
Law concepts and
their practical
application with
necessary
adjustments.
Demonstrated
exceptional
understanding of
Australian Business
Law concepts and
their practical
application with
necessary
adjustments.
Clarity of
Expression (10
marks)
Writing lacks
clarity and
coherence. Points
have not been
paraphrased well.
There are many
e
ors in spelling,
grammar, and
punctuation.
.
Writing is generally
clear with some
lapses in
coherence. Some
points have been
paraphrased well.
There are some
e
ors in spelling,
grammar, and
punctuation.
Writing is clear and
coherent. Most
points have been
paraphrased well.
There are some
e
ors in spelling,
grammar, and
punctuation.
Writing shows
good clarity and
cohesion. Points
have been
paraphrased well.
There are few
e
ors in spelling,
grammar, and
punctuation.
Writing shows
excellent clarity
and cohesion.
Points have been
skilfully
paraphrased.
There are no
e
ors in spelling,
grammar, and
punctuation.
Reference and
Formatting
(10 marks)
Assignment is not
presented as per
APIC assessment
presentation
guidelines and
includes
insufficient
application of APIC
Harvard style of
eferencing.
Assignment show
some adherence
to APIC
assessment
presentation
guidelines and
APIC Harvard style
of referencing.
Assignment mostly
adheres to APIC
assessment
presentation
guidelines and
APIC Harvard style
of referencing.
Assignment
completely adheres
to APIC assessment
presentation
guidelines with few
inconsistencies with
APIC Harvard style
of referencing.
Assignment
completely adheres
to APIC assessment
presentation
guidelines and APIC
Harvard style of
eferencing.
PRESENTATION
Comprehension
Of the
presentation.
(60 Marks)
Presentation is
poorly structured,
and the main points
are not accurately
included
Presentation is
easonably
structured, and the
main points are
included with some
points missing.
Presentation is
mostly structured,
and the main points
included with one or
two points missing.
Presentation is
highly structured,
and the main points
are mostly
accurately included
Presentation is
highly structured,
and the main points
accurately included
Visual Appeal
Presentation
slides, clarity,
grammar, spelling
and engaging
(20 marks)
Poor presentation skill.
The slides were
difficult to read and
too much information
had been copied onto
them.
There are many e
ors
in spelling, grammar,
and punctuation. No
Visual appeal.
Partially good
presentation skills.
critical review of the
chosen case. Minimal
effort made to make