Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Assessment TitleEssay Task Description Task Your task is to consider the contents of:- SEBoK http://www.sebokwiki.org Kerzner (2013) AS/NZS 15288 Systems engineering – Systems life cycle processes...

1 answer below »
Assessment TitleEssay
Task Description

Task

Your task is to consider the contents of:-

  • SEBoK http://www.sebokwiki.org
  • Kerzner (2013)
  • AS/NZS 15288 Systems engineering – Systems life cycle processes
  • Full Final Report from the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling
  • Chapter 5: Overarching Failures of Management of the Chief Counsel’s report from the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling
  • Other material as you feel appropriate

Then you must write an essay describing how these contents address the questions they pose and that explain the relevance of systems thinking to a project and an organisation by using the theories and ideas related to:-

  • General systems management
  • Organisational structures, forms and culture
  • Engineering risk, risk management,
  • Portfolio alignment
  • Business value
  • Portfolio management process cycle
  • Organisational maturity.

You should illustrate your arguments by identifying what different systems thinking tools and techniques might aid project managers solve project problems, such as what occurred with Texas City and Deepwater Horizon.

Purpose

The primary purpose of this assessment item is to help you to be able to define systems thinking and classify the tools and techniques related systems thinking. The secondary purpose of this assignment is to give you the opportunity to enhance your analysis, critical thinking and written communication skills; particularly in the areas of argument development and essay writing.

Structure

Your essay should be a properly constructed academic essay of 2,000 words.

It should contain an effective introduction, body and conclusion. The introduction should introduce the essay and include your argument. The body should present the evidence you have collected to support your argument, and the conclusion should restate your argument, summarise the evidence and make a conclusion regarding your argument. The essay should contain a coherent, but necessarily restricted review of the academic literature on the topics in question. The literature review should be integrated into the essay, not a separate section. Do not include an executive summary or an abstract. A reference list formatted in the prescribed APA style is compulsory. Do not include a bibliography.

This assessment item involves researching your assigned topic to enhance your understanding of project management concepts and utilisation of academic literature. Whilst you use the recommended textbooks you may also refer to relevant peer reviewed, academic journal articles. You will be expected to present information and evidence from, and cite, at least twenty (20) times from the prescribed unit material and you also are encouraged to use other PEER REVIEWED sources. The assessment submission must be made online through the unit web site.



Your assignment will be assessed on the extent and quality to which it meets each of the following criteria.

  1. A description of the theories and ideas specific to general systems management, organisational structures, forms and culture, value management, engineering risk, risk management, systems engineering and an assessment of the linkages between these? (30%)
  2. A demonstration of thorough knowledge and application of relevant project and portfolio management principles, concepts, methods and theories in a systems context? (20%)
  3. Appropriate and well structured, concise and clear expression of systems engineering arguments in response to the assessment task? (10%)
  4. A clear flow of thought throughout the paper with a clear purpose described in the introduction and a comprehensive conclusion? (10%)
  5. A critical review and integration of relevant academic and professional literature (cited at least twenty (20) times from six (6) separate reference sources)? (15%)
  6. Clarity of expression, grammar and spelling? (5%)
  7. Strict conformity to CQUniversity Australia APA Referencing Guide? (5%)
  8. Appropriate presentation format and presented within (±10%) of the word limit: 2,000 words? (5%)


Referencing Style
  • American Psychological Association (APA)

SubmissionOnline
Submission InstructionsThe file submitted must be a Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) document.
Learning Outcomes Assessed
  • Identify different systems thinking tools and techniques to aid project managers solve project problems.
  • Assess the relevance of systems engineering to project cases.
  • Describe how systems engineering concepts and methodologies can help a project, program and portfolio managers organise a project.
  • Explain the importance of appropriate selection of project management (PM) application systems in regards to meeting the internal and external objectives of a project.
  • Describe how the use of project management (PM) application systems can lead to effective PM knowledge management and decision making.
  • Compare and contrast the advantages and disadvantages of different manual and electronic project, program and portfolio (PPPM) application systems within each PPPM knowledge area over the life cycle of a project, program or portfolio.
  • Propose appropriate project, program and portfolio (PPPM) application systems to support successful project, program and portfolio execution in different industry domains.
  • Discuss contemporary developments in the use of project, program and portfolio (PPPM) application systems.


Graduate Attributes
  • Knowledge
  • Communication
  • Cognitive, technical and creative skills
  • Research
Answered Same Day May 20, 2020 PPMP20012 Central Queensland University

Solution

Abr Writing answered on May 28 2020
128 Votes
Project Portfolio
Running Head: Project Portfolio
Project Portfolio         9
Project Portfolio
[Document subtitle]
System thinking is considered as an important method of critical thinking through which an organization analyzes the relationships between its system's parts to anticipate and measure a situation for better decision-making. In this paper, we have evaluated the relevance of system thinking for information technology projects. The relevance of system thinking is calculated by a collection of significant literature through the use of secondary research sources. Moreover, this paper anticipated the system thinking relevance in information technology projects through theories and ideas specific to general systems management, organizational structures, forms, and culture, engineering risk and risk management, and value management. Apart from this, the paper has been considered a demonstration of thorough knowledge and also apply the relevant project and portfolio management principles theories, and concepts to anticipate the efficiency and importance of system thinking within the information technology projects like SAP software implementation. This paper will prove very effective and relevant for the target audience because it will provide them a significant knowledge about different project portfolio principles and relevant system integration theories. The target audience can apply this theoretical knowledge in their near future.
Walden (2015) General system management is a popular system and organizational structure theory. This theory offers the project management team of an organization to organize the hierarchy and role and responsibilities of a project in an effective manner. According to this theory, the system thinking is very relevant for the information technology projects (Van Der Aalst, 2016). It is because the general system management theory allows the information technology project team members to create several systems that work together. Therefore, the general system management theory becomes the reason for an improved organizational structure that ultimately
ings improvement in the system thinking process of an organization. Apart from this, Twisk (2015) believes that the general system management theory gave a strong impulse to system theory. Due to the strong impulsiveness, the general management theory able to introduce the viable systems model in favor of system thinking. This model outlines the interdisciplinary study that represents the significance of the system thinking in an effective manner. Moreover, it can also be said that the general system management theory is based on the concept of an open system to a project. Therefore, the IT projects considered the system thinking as a system built by energetic input-output that becomes the foremost factor for a project success in the near future. Hence, the general system management theory represents that the system thinking has a great relevance in information technology projects of today's scenario (Roberts, 2015). It does not only guide the project team members in determining their roles and responsibilities but also follow a systematic process to follow their aim and objectives effectively.
Apart from the general system management theory, organizational structures, forms, and culture also determine the relevance of system thinking to an Information technology project effectively. Perdana (2016) said that the organizational structures promote the system thinking through alignment of culture and process. It is because the organizational structures propound a standardized process which improves the system thinking inputs and outputs automatically. Apart from this, it is also believed that the organizational structures represent the logical sequence of the information technology project tasks performed to achieve the specific objective. Therefore, the organizational structure improves the system thinking process through codify best practices and facilitate effective coordination among individuals and groups. Therefore, it can be said that the organizational structures improve the cu
ent functional structure of system thinking that further enhances its usability as well as efficiency in the eyes of its users. So, it can be said that the organizational structure, forms, and culture performs required changes in system thinking process that further promotes the process efficiency and usability among users (Pandey, 2016). Hence, it can be said that...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here