Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Week 01 Discussion - The Bill of Rights: Let's start our weekly discussion forums with this question: Would the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the Constitution, be part of the...

1 answer below »
Week 01 Discussion - The Bill of Rights:
Let's start our weekly discussion forums with this question:
Would the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the Constitution, be part of the constitution if it were introduced today?
Provide me a 1.5 pages detailed solution for this assignment.
Document Preview:

Week 01 Discussion - The Bill of Rights: Let's start our weekly discussion forums with this question: Would the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the Constitution, be part of the constitution if it were introduced today? Provide me a 1.5 pages detailed solution for this assignment.

Answered Same Day Dec 20, 2021

Solution

David answered on Dec 20 2021
104 Votes
Week 01 Individual Assignment - The Supreme Court:
The supreme Court attains the highest level in the hierarchy of the judicial system, thus expected
to exert an optimal degree of compliance with legal process and constitutional frameworks. This
is the only way of controlling and securing public welfare interventions and constitutional rights.
Because of its high position in judicial system it acts as the last hope of the public and
institutions to get justice and fair decision complying with legal norms and social or public
welfares. Although, the decisions of the Supreme Court, against various social, economic and
corporate cases, are intended to comply with legal norms and provide fair justice to the
espective party, but in certain cases the prejudice of judges and law professionals creates severe
deviation in the perceived and actual case resolutions.
In its respective analysis of change in viewpoints of the Supreme Court over certain past
decades, Jeffery Rosen (2008) has notified that there has occu
ed significant drift in the
conventional and the cu
ent jurisdiction viewpoint of the Supreme Court professionals, existent
in the form of transformation of a Conservative approach to that of Corporatist approach. In the
espective article severe differences in the viewpoints of Robin Conrad and Ralph Nader have
een discussed, which supports respective Corporatist and Conservative approaches of judicial
process or system.
Ralph Nader (2012) has stated that cu
ent judicial decisions of the Supreme Court are
highly influenced by corporate prejudice and thus leading to higher degrees of corporate favor
decisions of the cases.
Rosen, J. (2008). Supreme Court Inc., The New York Times,...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here