this is the court visit report of nsw australia ,should be local court ,only and should be civil case only.lease only upload the additional task that you have requested and mention the correspondence...

Court Visit 1
Running Head: COURT VISIT
Court Visit
Court Visit 2
A) Niceties of the Background:
Name of the Visited Court: Burwood, 7-9 Belmore St, Australia
(http:
www.localcourt.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/localcourts/court_locations/courts_b.html)
Date of the visit: 18
th
September, 2013
The name of the case: Chu
Insurance Company of Australia Ltd. v/s Moore (Local Court,
2013)
Names of supervising judge & magistrate: Bathurst, C.J., Beazley, P., Macfarlan, J.A. Emmett,
J.A. and Ball, J.
Subject Matter associated to the case: Costs
Whether the Parties were symbolized: Yes
Solicitors:
Paisley & Colin Biggers (Plaintiffs)
In addition, there are several defendants of this case allied to the solicitors that are
evealed in the below table:
Name of Defendants Number of Defendants
Solomon Brothers I
st
& II
nd

Macpherson & Kelley Lawyers III
d
to 11
th

DLA Piper 12
th

Colin Biggers & Paisley 13
th

Arnold Bloch Leibler 14
th
& 15
th
(Local Court, 2013)
Moray & Agnew 16
th
& 17
th

Karp Steedman Ross-Adjie 18
th

Lavan Legal 19
th
& 20
th

http:
www.localcourt.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/localcourts/court_locations/courts_b.html
Court Visit 3
Advocate:
J A Redwood, D Williams SC & M F Newton (Plaintiffs)
There are also some defendants of this case that are connected to the advocate that are
exposed in the following table:
At the time of tripping court, I scrutinized that; the notice board restrains some useful
information in the written format that is related to the case. This information’s involve name of
the case, associated parties and the names of representatives of the case. Along with this, this
information’s were not adequate for me in order to understand this case in the proper &
appropriate manner. So I conversed with the court officer. The court officer was an excellent
person that assists me to offer some information associated to this case (Moens & Jones, 2012).
This information was helpful for me to recognize the viewpoints of all the parties connected with
this case.
B) The court proceedings
In the courtroom assembly, the work of all the participants can be observed in a proper
way. In addition, in the courtroom, I perceived that all the parties characterized their evidences as
Name of Defendants Number of Defendants
N C Hutley SC & T Prince I
st
& II
nd

A S Bell SC & A Munro III
d
to 11
th

G K Rich 14
th
& 15
th

T W Marskell 12
th
& 13
th
and 16
th
& 17
th

J D Steedman & M D Howard SC 18
th
& 20
th

Court Visit 4
well as views to the judge for having their favor. In counter, the cross lawyer posed some
questions to the participants throughout the court proceeding. Apart from this, I also initiate that
all the parties such as: all the parties, magistrate, judge & lawyers etc. were critical for hearing in
the court in any case. In addition, in court proceeding, the judge play a vital role to enhance the
efficacy of whole the system, to handle evidentiary hearings, to make the clear causes of
attesting judicial status & to elevate the power of magistrate judges in an appropriate manner
(Ford, 2010).
In the same manner, the judge also has control over the court system and also furnishes
full choices to all the parties to justify their views as well as evidences in a significant way. The
judge also gives a decision according to the rules, regulations & laws associated to the case after
hearing of all the sights, evidences and spectators of all the parties. Apart from this, the lawyers
also play a significant role in the court proceeding because of they make all the endeavors in
e
and of his party. For instance, these efforts necessitate protecting his/her client via presenting
all the witnesses as well as evidences in the attendance of the court. The lawyers also track all
the legal rules & procedures in order to present the evidences and also allowance the
authorization of the judge to present in the court. It is very crucial for the lawyers that they
should authorize from the court to fetch any proof before starting the court proceeding (Seymour
& Seymour, 2011).
At the same time, the judge also seizes decisions on the base of parties & dupes in the
proceeding in...