Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

The government is considering on whether or not to test visitors from outside the US for the Zika virus. To put this on a financial basis, lets assume that each visitor which enters the country with...

1 answer below »
The government is considering on whether or not to test visitors from outside the US for the Zika virus. To put this on a financial basis, lets assume that each visitor which enters the country with the disease costs the economy 20,000 in increased medical expenses. A visitor who enters without the disease contributes 5,000 to the national economy. Assume that 5% of all visitors have the disease.
a. If faced only with admitting or not admitting the visitors, what should the government do if it has no other information?
b. We can test the visitors (cost $100, mostly delay costs because it is slow) for the disease. If the test is 100% reliable what policy should the government adopt? c. Suppose that by using infrared temperature screening at the airport, 10% of the visitors with the disease test negative (not yet developed a detectably high temperature), and 20% of the visitors without the disease test positive (South American's are hot blooded). What is the value of this test? What policy should the government adopt? d. Finally suppose that those with normal temperatures are admitted and the visitors with high temperatures are given the more expensive test. Is this a useful strategy? e. We all fear of disease, especially exotic disease. How does the public's general risk aversion fit into the decisionmaking?
2 (35 points) A Tongan community with a population of 20,000 operates a small blood bank. On a typical day they will get 5 units of whole blood donated (don't worry about blood type, all Tongans are 0-). These donations occur randomly with a Poisson distribution being a reasonable first candidate to capture the randomness. On a typical day, 3 units of blood are required. Again, these are randomly distributed with a Poisson distribution providing a reasonable first candidate for capturing the randomness.
a.
b.
A Peace Corps volunteer suggests that they set up the problem as a simple M/M/1/../co queueing model. Lay out an implementation of the method for this problem. Compute P[0] and Lq for this situation. What does these measures mean in the context of the problem? c. Do your results suggest any problems with this implementation (assumptions that don't really fit)? Hint, it should.
Answered Same Day Dec 26, 2021

Solution

Robert answered on Dec 26 2021
122 Votes
Probability that visitor has disease = P (Visitor has disease) = .05
Probability that visitor does not has disease = P (Visitor does not has disease) = .95
(A) If faced only with admitting or not admitting visitors, what should the government do if it
has no other information?
Therefore, Expected value = .95*5000 - .05*20,000 = 3750
As there is total positive increase in the economy based on the given information, government
should admit visitors.
(B) We can test the visitors (Cost $100, mostly delay costs) for the disease. If the test is
100% reliable, what policy should the government adopt?
In this case, Expected value = .95*5000 – 100 = 4650 {Note that diseased visitors are not
allowed and hence no negative impact}
Since in this case also, as there is total positive increase in the economy based on the given
information, government should admit visitors.
(C) Suppose that by using infrared temperate screening at the airport, 10% of the visitors with
the disease test negative and 20% without disease test...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here