Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Student Name: ……………………………………………… (Block letters) Student Number: …………………………………………… HA3021 Company Law Assessment 2 Assessment Value: 20% Due: Week 10 in Class Assignment Topic: Andrew, Brian, Colin,...

1 answer below »

Student Name: ………………………………………………
(Block letters)
Student Number: ……………………………………………


HA3021 Company Law
Assessment 2
Assessment Value: 20%
Due: Week 10 in Class
Assignment Topic:
Andrew, Brian, Colin, Diana and Elizabeth were the directors of Gemsales Pty Ltd, a company engaged in the business of importing and supplying jewellery as wholesalers to the local market.
The company decided that as the market was becoming more competitive it needed to expand its business as it felt with increased volumes of sales it would be able to lower its prices and be more competitive. In order to do so it obtained a $4 million dollar loan from the Friendly Bank Ltd. $3 million was used to buy more stock and $1 million was used to buy a large new warehouse and showrooms from Traders Pty Ltd.
Colin was not at the meeting that had made these decisions as he was in hospital recovering from a serious accident. Elizabeth, as was her usual custom, had not attended the meeting but signed the requisite documentation agreeing to the expansion of the business and the getting of the loan. Diana who attended, said she did not know if she agreed and abstained from voting. Andrew and Brian both voted to go ahead with the expansion and the getting of the loan.
At about this time Brian has established contact with Victor, who was setting up a new business as a retailer of jewellery. Victor was looking for reliable suppliers, but said he would not deal with Gemsales Pty Ltd as he did not like Andrew, the Managing Director. Not wishing to miss out on such a lucrative business opportunity, Brian arranged to set up his own business as a jewellery wholesaler and a contract was entered into between Victor and Brian for the supply of jewellery.
Six months later, Brian resigned as a director. At the same time it was clear the company had over-extended itself and was insolvent and could not pay the interest on its loans.
It also became clear that Brian was a major shareholder in Traders Pty Ltd and the other directors were unaware of this at the time of the purchase of the warehouse and showrooms. Furthermore, Brian had been approaching other established customers of Gemsales Pty Ltd and had secured orders for his own business.
Advise as to the liability of ALL the parties both under common law and the Corporations Law. In your answer you should address all the issues relating to each of the directors and their duties to the corporation.
PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS:
References must be cited in Harvard referencing style (eg Smith XXXXXXXXXXThe assignment must include a bibliography (list of references used in the assignment). The Internet may be used for authoritative reference material provided the source, author, date of access, and site address is clearly shown in footnote format.
In addition to sources from the Internet, at least three hard-copy sources must also be used. These can be either books or articles or both. Materials from any common law jurisdiction may be used.

Answered Same Day Dec 23, 2021

Solution

Robert answered on Dec 23 2021
123 Votes
Running Head: Corporate Fault 1
Corporate Fault
Liability for Corporate Fault 2
Corporate fault
Abstract
This paper discusses the nature of liability on the directors of a corporation under United States
of American law. The liability to be discussed is on the basis of the misconduct by the directors,
illegal actions taken by them which are not as per the law. The liability is not just applied to the
directors rather it is for any personnel inside the corporation. Any actions taken by the internal
personnel will be evaluated from the ethical point of view. The simple reason for this is that in
the present scenario, the businesses are evaluated on many fronts including ethical point of view
and corporate governance. There are many businesses that failed simply due to bad corporate
governance. It is very important for the directors that they understand the impact of the decisions
that they take inside the company. Normally, it is very rare to hear about the liability faced by the
company‟s directors but stating law is very important since it is a part of corporate governance.
Normally
oad laws are not stated by the law making agency.
Liability for Corporate Fault 3

Corporate Fault
Introduction
US federal law is very different than that of the peer laws in other countries. The law
does not held liable all the directors for any type of misconduct by the directors in a company.
US federal laws state that the “potential director liability” for any corporate fault and misconduct
will flow along four na
ow channels that are legally defined:
According to Hu and West
ook, the first channel is regarding to the violations relating
to the mechanical state corporation statutes. The directors can be held liable under this channel.
This channel is specially formed for the creditors‟ protection. This can be named as creditors
protection act. These violations include many liabilities like liability for obligations of an entity
that has been incorporated defectively. Policies also define the dividend policy by a company. It
estricts the company to pay huge dividends to the shareholders in cash directly. This is
applicable in scenario when the capital, a company has, is not sufficient as per the rules. A
company does this when the directors‟ wants to get their money back that...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here