Please pick a prior court case dealing with a healthcare issue that interests you, a current...

Question

Please pick a prior court case dealing with a healthcare issue that interests you, a current healthcare event/issue that is pending or that has been in the news, or any like healthcare issue that is worthy of writing about and would be of interest to you or others. Whatever the topic/issue, you should be able to write about it using the criteria outlined below. If the topic does not lend itself to these criteria, it is probably not a good topic to consider. please i would like refrences on this assingment and in an apa format. this is a final research project

David · Accepted Answer

HEALTH CARE LAW
HEALTH CARE LAW 1
LAW
STUDENT’ NAME 
COURSE, YEAR 
UNIVERSITY NAME
PROFESSOR’S NAME
HEALTH CARE LAW 2
ABSTRACT 
Contract is defined as an agreement enforceable by commandment. Agreement is 
an indispensable constituent of a valid contract. Congregation of minds on a 
fastidious issue is an imperative element of a valid contract. Let us refer to the case 
analysis of Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. [1893] Q.B. 256 (C.A.).
HEALTH CARE LAW 3
FACTS 
Carbolic Smoke Ball co. is a renowned patent medicine company in Healthcare 
Industry. The Carbolic Smoke Ball Co created the 'Carbolic Smoke Ball' 
premeditated to avert users contracting influenza or analogous infections. The 
company advertised that it would endow with a reward of 100 pounds to anyone 
who contracted influenza subsequent to employing the smoke balls of the company 
for a definite interlude according to the printed guidelines. Mrs. Carlill procured 
the advertised smoke ball and contracted influenza in spite of employing the smoke 
ball according to the printed guidelines. She alleged the reward of 100 pounds. 
Carbolic Smoke Ball repudiated to reimburse and Carlill litigated for damages 
cropping up from breach of contract. Verdict for 100 pounds was entered for 
Carlill and Carbolic Smoke Ball petitioned (Robert W. Emerson J.D., 2009).     
HELD 
On the concern of whether there was a legitimate offer: The Company disagreed 
that the ‘promise’ was not formulated to anybody in fastidious. The Court, 
conversely, detained that this was not a contract with the humanity but was merely 
an offer to the world competent of developing into a contract with anybody 
performing the stipulated state of affairs. The Court moreover discarded the 
HEALTH CARE LAW 4
Company's allege that their advertisement comprised of a mere 'puff' and was not 
projected to be promissory.

Please pick a prior court case dealing with a healthcare issue that interests you, a current healthcare event/issue that is pending or that has been in the news, or any like healthcare issue that is...

Solution

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment