Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

LA TROBE UNIVERSITY 27 Practical Exercises: In the first two practical classes, you will study the release of antigens into faeces during natural fluke infections in cattle as well as the serum...

1 answer below »
LA TROBE UNIVERSITY
27
Practical Exercises:
In the first two practical classes, you will study the release of antigens into faeces during natural
fluke infections in cattle as well as the serum antibody responses of cattle to liver fluke antigens
esulting from the infection. Antigen and antibody responses will be evaluated using the following
two techniques:
1. Coproantigen Sandwich ELISA (Practical 1)
2. Serology ELISA (Practical 2)
Both these tests rely on the specificity of an antibody to react with its target antigen. These
techniques can be used as experimental tools to quantitate the release of antigen in faeces as well
as antibody responses to antigens following infection.
Practical 1
Coproantigen Sandwich ELISA

The BIO-X Bovine Fasciola hepatica coproantigen ELISA kit allows the detection of coproantigens
present in faecal material of cattle infected with F. hepatica. These coproantigens can be found in
the faeces even outside the fluke’s egg-laying period. The previously mentioned serology ELISA
assays allow detection of specific antiparasite circulating antibodies but tests of this type are of
limited diagnostic value in endemic areas because antibody titers remain at high levels even when
animals have been successfully treated (eg see Figure 4 in Brockwell et al XXXXXXXXXXThus, the
advantage of using a coproantigen sandwich ELISA assay compared to a serology indirect ELISA
assay is that the samples will test positive only if adult flukes are present in the bile ducts of sheep
and cattle and antigens are passed out in the faeces of infected animals.

The coproantigen ELISA technique is ca
ied out as follows: detailed methods are provided below:
The coproantigen sandwich ELISA is an indirect assay using faeces as the source of the parasite
antigen. Alternate rows of the 96-well microplate have been sensitised with a specific polyclonal
antibody against F. hepatica antigens that are shed in the infected animal faeces. This antibody
thus captures the antigens in the faecal material, known as ‘coproantigens’. The remaining rows
in the microplate have been sensitised with a polyclonal antibody that is not specific for the
parasite antigens (see Fig 3). These control rows allow differentiation between a specific
immunological reaction and non-specific binding to eliminate false positives.
Faecal material is diluted in dilution buffer, added in duplicate to the wells of the microplate and
incubated. A specific monoclonal antibody (coupled to biotin) produced against an antigenic
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
Fig 3. In the strip, rows A, C, E and
G have been coated with specific
polyclonal antibody against F.
hepatica and rows B, D, F and H
have been coated with a control
antibody (polyclonal antibody not
specific for parasite).
28
determinant of F. hepatica is added to the wells. A second conjugate, a peroxidase-coupled avidine
specific to biotin is added and the plate is incubated. At the end of the incubation period the
chromogen solution, tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), is added. If F. hepatica coproantigens are
present and the two conjugates have bound in the F. hepatica-specific antibody-coated wells, the
enzyme catalyses the transformation of the colourless chromogen into a pigmented compound
(blue). The intensity of the resulting blue colour is proportionate to the amount of coproantigen
ound in the well. The enzymatic reaction is stopped by acidification, which turns the compound
yellow and the resulting optical density at 450 nm can be read using a spectrophotometer.
The signals recorded for the negative control wells are subtracted from the co
esponding
positive wells. A control positive antigen is provided with the kit so we can validate that the
experimental materials are functioning co
ectly i.e. validates the results. This control antigen is
composed of lyophilised ground flukes and will elicit a strong positive result when used in the
ELISA.

1. Add the diluted faecal samples to the plate coated with capturing antibodies specific for
the F. hepatica faecal antigen (shown in red) and incubate for 1 hour to allow antibody
inding.
















Capture antibody

2. Wash any unbound antigen from the plate.

3. Incubate the plate with the biotin-linked detection antibody (it will bind to the antigen that
is already bound to the capturing antibody).










Bound antigen
Biotin-linked detection antibody
Biotin
29


4. Wash the unbound biotin-linked detection antibody from the plate.

5. Incubate with avidine-peroxidase conjugate.
















6. Wash the unbound avidine-peroxidase conjugate from the plate.

7. Incubate with the substrate (TMB) of the enzyme (peroxidase) linked to avidine.

8. Add the stop solution and read the result on a microplate reader.























Biotin-linked detection antibody
Biotin
Avidine
Peroxidase
30
Practical 1 Exercise

History:

A farmer has a mob of cattle and is concerned that they may be suffering from a parasitic infection.
The mob consists of 300 dairy cattle aged 12-15 months with an average bodyweight of 320kg.
Animals have been grazing on i
igated pasture for the previous six months consisting mainly of
perennial ryegrass and clover. A few animals appear to be losing condition and have a “bottle jaw”
plus at least half of the mob have coats that are rough and dull in appearance. In the last month
they received a pour-on roundworm drench (Cydectin) and had a booster vaccine of 5 in 1
administered. The owner does not think the animals have improved since the pour-on treatment
and is wo
ied that the herd may be infected with liver fluke as he has heard that this parasite can
e a problem in his area of Maffra, Victoria.

The farmer has sent 24 faecal samples from his herd for fluke analysis. Each team will receive 2
cattle faecal samples for evaluation and the data from the practical class you are in will be used to
assess the fluke status in the herd (e.g. if you are in Group A, use only Group A results).

Aims: To determine the relative prevalence and intensity of infection in the herd and to advise the
farmer whether it is economical to drench his herd for liver fluke.


Samples: Each team will receive 2 faecal samples sent by the farmer for liver fluke testing; the
class will analyse 24 samples altogether and share the data

Test: Samples will be tested using the Bio-X liver fluke Coproantigen ELISA kit

Bio-X liver fluke Coproantigen ELISA Materials and Method

Materials:

Please wear a pair of gloves before handling any of the below mentioned materials!


✓ 200 μl Micro Pipette
✓ 200 μl Micro Pipette tips (Yellow)
✓ 1x 8 well ELISA strip (BIO-X Bovine Fasciola hepatica coproantigen ELISA
kit)
✓ 2 x tubes of Cattle faecal sample extracts
✓ 1 x tube of negative control
✓ 1 x tube of Positive antigen reference solution (this is available to only 1
team per class)
✓ 1 x bottle of washing solution
✓ 1 x tube of diluted Biotin-linked anti-Fasciola hepatica conjugate
✓ 1x tube of diluted avidine peroxidase conjugate
XXXXXXXXXXChromogen (TMB) solution
✓ 1x tube of Stop solution (1M H3PO4 acid – handle with care)
✓ 1x piece of cling film
✓ 1 x piece of Aluminium foil
✓ Paper towel
31
Method:

Steps 1 – 4 have already been completed for you. Your exercise begins from step 5 onwards;

1. Dilute the 5 x concentrated dilution buffer 5 fold by taking 25 ml of 5 x concentrated
dilution buffer and adding 100 ml of distilled water (dH2O).

2. Dilute the given cattle faecal samples in the dilution buffer (2 g of faeces + 2 ml of
dilution buffer).

3. Centrifuge at 1,000 g for 10 minutes.

4. Collect the supernatants into labelled centrifuge tubes.


Complete steps 5 – 20 during your practical class

5. Pipette 100 μl aliquots of the diluted samples to the wells of your strip (e.g. sample 1 in
wells A1 and B1; sample 2 in wells C1 and D1). Proceed in the same manner for the positive
eference (G1 and H1). Samples 1 and 2 are unknown samples sent by the farmer to be
tested for liver fluke infection (please see table below).
6.















7. Cover strip with cling film and incubate at room temperature for 1 hour.

8. Empty the wells of their contents by flipping the strip over a sink and then tap the strip
upside down against a piece of clean abso
ent paper to remove all the liquid.

9. Wash strip by adding washing solution. Fill all the used wells to the top with the washing
solution using a squirt bottle.

10. Empty the wells completely once more by turning the strip over sharply over a sink and
then tap as described in step 7.

11. Repeat steps 8 and 9, twice more (in total the strip must be washed 3 times), taking care
to avoid the formation of bu
les in the microwells.
Team Number
A Sample 1
B Sample 1
C Sample 2
D Sample 2
E Negative control
F Negative control
G Positive
Reference
H Positive
Reference
Samples 1
Answered Same Day Apr 22, 2021 AGR3AH La Trobe University

Solution

Anju Lata answered on Apr 27 2021
156 Votes
2
Title: Evaluation of Antigen and Antibody Response using Coproantigen Sandwich ELISA and Serology ELISA
PRACTICAL REPORT
    Introduction
The study was conducted to report the appearance of coproantigens in the faeces during the natural infections of F.hepatica in cattle and the serum antibody responses of cattle to liver fluke antigens resulting from the infection. The study evaluates the antigen and antibody response using corpoantigen ELISA and serology ELISA.
Liver fluke or Fasciola hepatica is a trematode parasite, causing liver fluke disease. The disease occurs from the migration of multiple immature flukes through the liver, or their presence in bile ducts. It mainly affects the cattles and sheep. Lifecycle of the trematode involves an intermediate host snail Galba truncatula, in which the parasite can multiple upto 500 times or more in 3-4 months. The disease causes considerable impact over the economy of livestock industry. The most important hazards include loss of production because of reduction in meat, wool production and meat production. Other losses include cost of anthelmintics, labor, drenches, condemnation of liver during the meat inspection, reduction in fertility, growth rate and draught power. There is delayed growth of animals, reduced production of milk, low feed efficiency and loss due to mo
idity and mortality of animals.
The two ELISA methods chosen in this study are corpoantigen ELISA and serology ELISA. Coproantigen ELISA test reflects the presence of fluke in the fecal samples of the cattle. It needs no complex equipment and is easier to conduct. It can process large number of specimens quickly. The test may be used at field conditions and is proved as safer means to monitor the cattles.
Serology ELISA measures the antibodies in the blood and is helpful in determining if the antibodies are present for certain infectious agents.
Aims
Practical1: To find out the relative prevalence and intensity of fluke infection in the herd of cattle
Practical 2: To measure the antibodies in the blood of cattle against the fluke infection
Materials and Methods
200 μl Micro Pipette, 200 μl Micro Pipette tips (Yellow) , 1x 8 well ELISA strip (BIO-X Bovine Fasciola hepatica coproantigen ELISA kit), 2 x tubes of Cattle faecal sample extracts, 1 x tube of negative control , 1 x tube of Positive antigen reference solution (this is available to only 1 team per class), 1 x bottle of washing solution , 1 x tube of diluted Biotin-linked anti-Fasciola hepatica conjugate, 1x tube of diluted avidine peroxidase conjugate Chromogen (TMB) solution, 1x tube of Stop solution (1M H3PO4 acid – handle with care) , 1x piece of cling film , 1 x piece of Aluminium foil and Paper towel
Method of the experiment was followed as per the instructions given in practical manual, p.36.
Results
Part A-(Coproantigen...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here