Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Jewell-Rung was a Canadian corporation that imported and sold men’s clothing at wholesale. Haddad was a New York corporation that manufactured and sold men’s clothing under the ‘‘Lakeland’’ label. The...

1 answer below »

Jewell-Rung was a Canadian corporation that imported and sold men’s clothing at wholesale. Haddad was a New York corporation that manufactured and sold men’s clothing under the ‘‘Lakeland’’ label. The companies agreed that Haddad would sell 2,325 Lakeland garments to Jewell-Rung, for $250,000. Jewell-Rung began to take orders for the garments from its Canadian customers. Jewell-Rung had orders for about 372 garments when it learned that Haddad planned to allow another company, Olympic, the exclusive Canadian right to manufacture and sell Lakeland garments. Jewell-Rung sued Haddad for its lost profits. Haddad moved for summary judgment, claiming that Jewell-Rung could not recover lost profits because it had not ‘‘covered.’’ Is Haddad right? Why might Jewell-Rung not have covered?

Answered 45 days After May 26, 2022

Solution

Sudipta answered on Jul 10 2022
74 Votes
Answe
The concept of lost profit is quite popular in legal business scenarios. Lost profit is damage that is faced by companies due to disruption in the business operation. The damage could be resultant of a variety of factors such as
each of contract accident, physical damage of business property or equipment,
each of contract, and others. As per the case scenario of “Jewell-Rung vs. Haddad,” it can be said that Jewell-Rung’s sue is not validated as there was no legal...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here