English language ru
ic.docx
Academic and Communication Skills Essay Writing Ru
ic
Task response
Good response
Satisfactory response
Unsatisfactory response
Links
Purpose
Understanding and addressing the task
Appropriate, relevant
Key points covered
Understands the task and the information but not all key points are included or fully developed
Not demonstrated an understanding of the topic
Information often inaccurate or i
elevant
Planning and assignment
Structure
argument
introduction
conclusion
paragraphs
Easy to follow
Clear argument
Context, topic and main ideas
Summing up
One main idea (in a topic sentence); linked to overall idea
Not always easy to follow
Evidence of an overall argument,
does not address the three main areas adequately
Conclusion attempted but does not appropriately sum up the argument presented; main idea not always clea
Difficult to follow
argument attempted but
does not fully address the context, topic and main ideas
no clear conclusion
lacks a main idea
Essay structure
Quicktip
Essay structure
Tutorial
Research
Integrating evidence Paraphrasing/ synthesising
Referencing
citing
Paraphrases and synthesises information in own words; Quotes used sparingly
Information is co
ectly referenced –in-text and in reference list
Some ability to express ideas in own words
Aware of required system and how it should be used
Relies heavily on words and passages copied from texts
Referencing requirements not followed
Paraphrasing
Paraphrasing tutorial
Integrating references
Referencing -
Sentences
Grammar
Vocabulary
Spelling
Range of sentences
Few e
ors
Good use of appropriate words
Co
ect
Some e
ors but do not interfere with meaning
Vocabulary adequate for the task occasional e
ors. Some difficulty with subject-specific words, terms
Generally co
ect, some e
ors
E
ors are frequent, making understanding difficult
Limited vocabulary, words often inco
ect or inco
ectly used
Numerous e
ors, spell check not used
Sentence construction
Spelling
Feedback
Writing communicates meaning clearly and achieves purpose of the task
Writing generally communicates effectively but logic and meaning not always clea
Logic and meaning not clear
AB614- GUIDELINES FOR ORAL PRESENTATION
ONPS2388 - GUIDELINES FOR UNDERGADUATE REPORT
The report forms part of the assessment for the course- it is worth 35% of the final mark.
The report is to be submitted through the Turnitin Assessment task dropbox. Late submission will be penalised at 2 marks per day. Extensions only by Special Consideration application.
As a general indication, the Turnitin % match should be less than 10%. The way to ensure this is to write everything yourself! Do not copy and paste, even if you rea
ange. This is plagiarism. You can submit to Turnitin as often as you like up to the due date. Just overwrite the old submission.
The report should be up to 2000 words in length, excluding references. Put the word count on the Title page. No listed word count, or exceeding the limit, will lose a mark.
Topic:
Discuss the concept of vaccination. What are the various types of vaccinations, and how do they stimulate the various arms of the immune system? Give some examples of various types of vaccines. What are some of the newer types of vaccines in development?
Write one section (several paragraphs) on the various vaccines against Covid-19. Information about this can be found at the WHO website, and in the PubMed literature. What are the advantages/disadvantages of the different Covid vaccines?
The style is relatively flexible, but should contain such divisions as a Title page, table of contents, introductory paragraph, various sections describing your findings, a concluding paragraph and bibliography. Figures are welcome, but if they are not your own, must be referenced.
The report must include references from the primary literature (e.g. PubMed). Do not just cite URL's, lecture notes, Wikipedia etc. References must be cited co
ectly in-text and listed at the end of the report, using any standard referencing style. Example below.
1 Drickamer, K XXXXXXXXXXC-type lectin-like domains. Cu
. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9, 585–590
2 Figdor, C.G., van Kooyk, Y. and Adema, G.J XXXXXXXXXXC-type lectin receptors on dendritic cells and Langerhans cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2, 77–84
3 Gantner, B.N., Simmons, R.M., Canavera, S.J., Akira, S. and Underhill, D.M XXXXXXXXXXCollaborative induction of inflammatory responses by dectin-1 and Toll-like receptor 2. J. Exp. Med. 197, 1107–1117
Assessment
The report will be assessed by the following criteria:
Content: Quality of the vaccine overview and discussion of the examples chosen (Marked out of 15)
You should have an introduction that describes the concept of vaccination, perhaps some of the history, and then describes in some detail the various types of vaccines, both in use and in development, including vaccines targeting Covid-19. A detailed basic summary of the immune system IS NOT required.
Demonstration of Understanding of Immunological Principles and Applications (out of 12)
You need to describe the immune mechanisms in good detail to get high marks. In particular, how is the immune system harnessed by the vaccines to elicit protective immunity?
Quality of writing and communication/ Presentation/Logic/Flow of Report (out of 8)
Grammar should be good, 2 marks off if lots of e
ors / typos. Referencing should be co
ect, and there should be at least eight recent publications (last three years). Total references should be 20-30.