Content HD+
10 points
HD
8 points
D
7 points
C
6 points
P
5 points
N
2.5 points
N-LOW
0 points
Cover Page With
Automatic Table Of
Contents, Cover Letter,
Executive Summary and
Background of the
Business Case
Outstanding cover page and
automatic table of Contents.
Outstanding Cover Letter and
Executive Summary of the
usiness case.
Outstanding Introduction and
ackground of the business case.
Excellent cover page and
automatic table of Contents.
Excellent cover letter and
executive Summary of the
usiness case.
Excellent introduction and
ackground of the business case.
Very good cover page and
automatic table of Contents.
Very good cover letter and
executive Summary of the
usiness case.
Very good introduction and
ackground of the business case.
Good cover page and
automatic table of Contents.
Good cover letter and
executive summary of the
usiness case.
Good introduction and
ackground of the business
case.
Satisfactory cover page and
automatic table of
Contents.
Satisfactory cover letter
and executive summary of
the business case.
Satisfactory introduction
and background of the
usiness case.
Poor cover page and
automatic table
of Contents.
Poor cover letter and
executive summary of
the business case.
Poor introduction and
ackground of the
usiness case.
No cover page and
automatic table of
contents.
No cover letter
and executive
summary of the
usiness case is
submitted.
Superficial/or no
introduction and
ackground of the
usiness case.
Distinct CSR element,
Evidence of International
Business Initiative with
an Asian Focus, Business
Case Definition and
Business Case SWOT,
PESTEL & Stakeholder
Analysis
Outstanding attempt to show the
element of CSR with the evidence
of international business initiative
and Asian focus.
Outstanding identification and
description of the internal, micro
and macro environmental factors
that could influence the project
outcome.
Outstanding Stakeholder Analysis.
Excellent attempt to show the
element of CSR with the evidence
of international business initiative
and Asian focus.
Excellent identification and
description of the internal, micro
and macro environmental factors
that could influence the project
outcome.
Excellent Stakeholder Analysis.
Very good attempt to show the
element of CSR with the evidence
of international business initiative
and Asian focus.
Very good identification and
description of the internal, micro
and macro environmental factors
that could influence the project
outcome.
Very good Stakeholder Analysis.
Good attempt to show the
element of CSR with
the evidence of international
usiness initiative and Asian
focus.
Good identification and
description of the internal,
micro and macro
environmental factors that
could influence the project
outcome.
Good Stakeholder Analysis.
Satisfactory attempt to
show the element of CSR
with the evidence of
international business
initiative and Asian focus.
Satisfactory identification
and description of the
internal, micro and macro
environmental factors that
could influence the project
outcome.
Poor attempt to show
the element of CSR with
the evidence of
international business
initiative and Asian
focus.
Poor identification and
description of the
internal, micro and
macro environmental
factors that could
influence the project
outcome.
No attempt to
show the element
of CSR with
the evidence of
international
usiness initiative
and Asian focus.
Identification and
description of the
internal, micro and
macro
environmental
factors that could
influence the
project outcome
was not provided.
Feasibility Analysis-
Industry, Market,
Competitors, Suppliers,
Customers, Logistics and
Operations
Outstanding feasibility analysis. Excellent feasibility analysis. Very good feasibility analysis. Good feasibility analysis. Satisfactory
quality feasibility analysis.
Poor feasibility analysis. Feasibility analysis
not provide
Comprehensive Program
Logic Model, Listing all
SMART Objectives,
Relevant activities,
Outputs and Outcomes,
Gantt Chart
Outstanding Program Logic Model
with SMART Objectives, Relevant
Activities, Outputs and Outcomes.
Outstanding Gantt Chart
Excellent Program Logic Model
with SMART Objectives, Relevant
Activities, Outputs and Outcomes.
Excellent Gantt Chart
Very Good Program Logic Model
with SMART Objectives, Relevant
Activities, Outputs and Outcomes.
Very good Gantt Chart.
Good Program Logic Model
with SMART objectives,
Relevant Activities, Outputs
and Outcomes.
Good Gantt Chart.
Satisfactory Program Logic
Model with SMART
Objectives, Relevant
Activities, Outputs and
Outcomes.
Satisfactory Gantt Chart.
Poor Program Logic
Model with SMART
Objectives, Relevant
Activities, Outputs and
Outcomes.
Poor Gantt Chart.
Program Logic
Model not
provided.
Gantt Chart not
provided.
Comprehensive/Relevant
Human & Physical
Resources, Budget
Credible and Based on
Human and Physical
Resources, Including
Immediate/Once Off,
Month by Month and 3
Years Summary with
Evidence of Research
Outstanding Human and Physical
Resources Provided.
Outstanding budget.
All figures
are appropriately referenced and
explained
Excellent Quality of the Human
and Physical Resources.
Excellent quality of the budget.
All budget figures are based on
the provided human and physical
esources.
Very Good Quality of the Human
and Physical Resources.
Good Quality of the Human and
Physical Resources.
Very detailed budget.
Most budget figures are based on
the provided human and physical
esources.
Good Quality of the Human
and Physical Resources.
Good quality of the budget.
Some budget figures are not
ased on the provided human
and physical resources.
Satisfactory Quality of the
Human and Physical
Resources.
Satisfactory quality of the
udget.
Most figures are not based
on the provided human
and physical resources.
Poor Quality of the
Human and Physical
Resources.
Poor Quality of the
Budget.
Budget is Not Based on
the Provided Human and
Physical Resources.
Human and
Physical Resources
not provided
Budget not
Provided.
No evidence of
esearch and
explanation.
All figures
are appropriately referenced and
explained
Most figures
are appropriately referenced and
explained
Some figures are
not appropriately referenced
and/ or explained.
Evidence of Research is
somewhat satisfactory.
Evidence of research is
very poor.
Appendix: Business Case
Project Team, Project
Management
Methodology and Other
Relevant Appendices
Outstanding business case project
team.
Outstanding business case project
team and project management
methodology.
Excellent business case project
team.
Excellent Business Case project
team and Project Management
Methodology.
Very good business case project
team.
Very good business case project
team and project management
methodology.
Good business case project
team.
Good business case project
team and project
management methodology.
Satisfactory business case
project team.
Satisfactory business case
project team and project
management
methodology.
Poor quality of Business
Case Team.
Poor quality of business
case project team and
project management
methodology.
Business Case
Project Team not
Provided.
Business case
project team and
project
management
methodology not
provided.
Writing, Style &
Submission
HD+
10 points
HD
8 points
D
7 points
C
6 points
P
5 points
N
2.5 points
N-LOW
0 points
Professional Standard of
Writing, Spelling,
Grammar, Punctuation
and Template
Requirements: 2cm
Margin, 12 Point Arial for
Body, Spacing, Consistent
Heading Style
Outstanding standard of writing,
spelling, grammar and
punctuation and template
equirements
Outstanding clarity and structure.
Excellent standard of writing,
spelling, grammar and
punctuation and template
equirements
Excellent clarity and structure.
Very Good standard of writing,
spelling, grammar and
punctuation and template
equirements
Very Good clarity and structure.
Good standard of writing,
spelling, grammar and
punctuation and template
equirements
Good clarity and structure.
Satisfactory standard of
writing, spelling, grammar
and punctuation and
template requirements
Satisfactory clarity and
structure.
Poor standard of writing,
spelling, grammar and
punctuation and
template requirements
Poor clarity and
structure.
Very poor
standard of
writing, spelling,
grammar and
punctuation and
template
equirements
No Clarity and no
structure.
Timely Submission - All
Submission Requirements
are Satisfied as Stated in
the Unit Guide
Outstanding and timely
submission.
Excellent and timely submission. Very Good and timely submission. Good and timely submission. Satisfactory and timely
submission.
Only some submission
equirements are
followed as stated in the
unit guide and or late
submission.
Submission
equirements
were not followed
as stated in the
unit guide and late
submission.
Referencing HD+
10 points
HD
8 points
D
7 points
C
6 points
P
5 points
N
2.5 points
N-LOW
0 points
In text References and
End References According
to Harvard Style.
Outstanding use of Harvard Style
Referencing.
Excellent use of Harvard Style
Referencing.
Very Good use of Harvard Style
Referencing.
Good use of Harvard Style
Referencing. You have some
minor inconsistencies with
the Harvard Style use.
Satisfactory use of Harvard
Style Referencing. You
have followed the Harvard
Style Referencing but have
some inconsistencies.
Minimal attempt to use
Harvard Style
Referencing. Harvard
style referencing has not
een followed
consistently. Major
deficiency in use of
Harvard Style
Referencing.
No attempt to use
Harvard Style
Referencing.
Quality and the