Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

GM offered compensation to dealers whose dealerships were closed pursuant to the terms of a government bailout. The dealers started a class action for $750 million in Ontario, claiming that GM had...

1 answer below »

GM offered compensation to dealers whose dealerships were closed pursuant to the terms of a government bailout. The dealers started a class action for $750 million in Ontario, claiming that GM had forced them to sign contracts and that Cassels Brock was negligent in providing legal advice. The key issue here was whether these contracts had been formed in Ontario. If they were, the Ontario courts would have jurisdiction over the lawsuit. GM sent an agreement to each of the dealers for execution. Each dealer had to sign the agreement and return it to GM by a specified date. GM also indicated that the agreements would not be effective “unless and until GM provides written notice to those dealers that the Acceptance Threshold Condition and any other required conditions have been met or have been waived by GM . . . ” Was the contract with a dealer formed when GM signed the executed agreement after it was received from the dealer (i.e., in Ontario), or when the dealer received the written notice from GM (i.e., in the province in which the dealer was located)?

Answered 133 days After May 23, 2022

Solution

Ca Komal answered on Oct 04 2022
51 Votes
BUSINESS LAW - CONTRACTS
Contract
As per the law, a contract would be legally certain when there is a mutual consent of both the parties and all the terms of agreement are met.
Here, in this case one of the terms of agreement was clearly indicated that “GM will sent an agreement to each of the...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here