Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

For an analysis of growth within or across countries the Augmented Solow model developed by Mankiw et al (1992), is capable of incorporatingfactors such as trade, FDI, inequality, and a measure of...

1 answer below »

For an analysis of growth within or across countries the Augmented Solow model developed by Mankiw et al (1992), is capable of incorporatingfactors such as trade, FDI, inequality, and a measure of institutional quality in addition to the core variables of capital and labour, etc.

A: Select one additional non-core variable and a country (or countries) of your choice and set up your empirical model for investigating potential impact that the variable may have on growth for the country/countries you have selected. Provide a theoretical and empirical justification for the inclusion of the selected variable. 10%

B: Using the World Bank World Development Indicators (WDI) download relevant time series data for your model; make use of other internationally reputable sources to complement your dataset if data are not available in the WDI. Conduct a preliminary analysis of your data using relevant descriptive statistics techniques. 10%

C: Run relevant regressions using Microfit. Present the output of your regression, comment on the regression results generated and discuss their theoretical and empirical validity. 20%

D: Discuss the main problems that you may face conducting regression analysis (other than non-stationarity), and by reference to your regression results, discuss whether they suffer from any of these problems. Make use of relevant diagnostic tests whenever appropriate. 20%

E: Identify whether the variables in your model suffer from non-stationarity. Discuss the possible implication of non-stationarity for your model and how this problem could be addressed. 20%

F: In the light of your findings under D and E above, make any necessary changes to your model to correct for any of the problems that you have identified. Compare and contrast results generated here with those under C. To what extent are you confident about the reliability of your result? What are the policy implications from this analysis?
Answered Same Day Dec 21, 2021

Solution

David answered on Dec 21 2021
116 Votes
Analysis of effect of FDI on Growth on India 1
Analysis of effect of FDI on Growth in India
Analysis of effect of FDI on Growth on India 2
Introduction:
Empirical model for investigating potential impact of Foreign Direct Investment on the
growth for the country:
We design a structural MRW-style, following Newhaus, 2005, and the method followed by
Bassanini, Scarpella and Hemnnings(2001), where-in, we try to find the impact of FDI on
economic growth, by substituting it in place of Human Capital. The reasons of ommitting Human
Capital measure, used by MRW or Ba
ow and Lee‟s works, arises from two key observations:
a. The incompleteness of the metrics used, i.e. the quality factor is missing more graduates
in a country doesn‟t mean more employable graduates.
. The strong Linear Co
elation between the endogenous measures of tfp at time A, A(0)
and MRW‟s estimates of H, which could be one reason ascribed to the „wrong signs‟ of H.
In this part we will see that how FDI affects growth.
FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) can be said as the foreign capital holdings in the economy (thus
abstracting from qualitative issues that differentiate different kinds of FDI).
So the production function, has two kinds of Capital, domestic and foreign with two
different multipliers and the same Augmented Labor function.
,
Taking log on both sides, and first differencing we have:
( ( )) ( ( )) ( ) ( ) ( )

Plugging in steady state conditions from standard MRW framework, we have
( ( )) ( ( )) ( ( )) ( )


( )
+



( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Analysis of effect of FDI on Growth on India 3
So, our regression model becomes:
,
which is in Autoregressive, Distributed Lag 1 form. We choose India to illustrate this
analysis.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Choosing a particular Nation:
The advantage of this is computational simplicity. We do away with a host of issues that separate
the history of similar countries. We do not bother ourselves with controls, choice of optimal
instruments, heterogeneity and outliers. As a disadvantage, we cannot abstract, by identifying
characteristics of countries that na
ow down on the tight fit of estimates.
World Bank Development Indicators:
Using World Bank World development Indicators, we download data on GDP in constant LCU,
which is available for all 3 countries, population growth. We use UNCTAD‟s data on FDI
inflows, since figures on the same are not available in WDI. To see the distributed lag structure,
we use plots.
India
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
diff(lnGDP)
ln(vi)
ln(sd)
lnVi
ln FDI
Analysis of effect of FDI on Growth on India 4
Facts:
Talking of trends, we note two interesting facts:
a. Seasonality in all of the “exogenous” variables: Since the variables, are not
exogenous, we would need to re-check for a state-space model.
. High Co
elation between fluctuations in domestic savings, FDI and Vi‟s. This
could be spurious, but suggests a deeper policy analysis, suspecting simultaneity bias,
with additional proxies like Grant in Aid, for “reforms”, which is accordance with
eliefs for at least India and China, but we will withhold this discussing till question,
where-in we‟ll make concluding remarks.
MRW
MRW, is a structural model of empirical Analysis. By “structural”, we mean, we have a model
through which we try to explain the relationship between the variables. Thus, we have already
taken time lags, in A. Nevertheless, keeping the spirit of the questions, we do the following:
a. Run an ols on a simple log-log model. [This would provide a useful
enchmark].
lnY(i)=a*ln(FDI)+b*ln(sd)+c*ln(Vi)+ei
. Run our regression based on the model we have considered check for the
obustness.
Analysis of effect of FDI on Growth on India 5
Run an OLS on a simple log-log model.
INDIA
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 1
R Square 1
Adjusted R Square
0.9655
17
Standard E
or 0
Observations 32
ANOVA
df SS MS F
Signific
ance F
Regression 3
2.55491
1
0.851
637
#N
U
M! #NUM!
Residual 29 0 0
Total 32
2.55491
1
Coeffi
cients
Standa
d E
or t Stat
Lower
95%
Upper
95%
Lower
95.0%
Upper
95.0%
Intercept 0 0 65535 0 0 0 0
ln FDI 0 0 65535 0 0 0 0
ln(vi) 1...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here