Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

ESSAY ONE Peter owed a small house (the “House”) on Sick-a-more Street in Pineview. On January 15, 2008, Peter sold the house to John. The purchase price for the house was $100,000. John gave Peter...

1 answer below »

ESSAY ONE

Peter owed a small house (the “House”) on Sick-a-more Street in Pineview. On January 15, 2008, Peter sold the house to John. The purchase price for the house was $100,000. John gave Peter $50,000 in cash and executed a promissory note (the “Peter Note”) in the amount of $50,000 payable to Peter. This note was secured by a deed of trust (the “Peter Deed of Trust”). The Peter Note provided that John would pay interest at the rate of 10% a year annually on the 15th of January of each year for ten years and that the principal balance would be due and payable in full on the tenth anniversary of the note, January 15, 2018. Peter did not record his Deed of Trust.

On December 15, 2008, John approached United Bank, the largest local bank in Pineview, which is the County Seat (place of government records) of Boone County, for a loan. He needed money to be able to make the $5000 interest payment on the Peter Note. John told Bill, the loan officer, about the Peter Note and that he wanted to be able to borrow money for a few years to make his interest payments. United Bank agreed to lend up to $30,000 to John (the “United Bank Loan”). The United Bank Loan was set up as a “revolving loan” which meant that John could borrow money from time to time as needed, up to the maximum amount of $30,000. The United Bank Loan was evidenced by a promissory note (the “United Bank Note”) and was secured by a Deed of Trust (the United Bank Deed of Trust) lien against the House The United Bank Loan was payable on demand by the Bank, but if no demand was made, interest only was payable annually. On December 15, 2008, United Bank recorded the United Bank Deed of Trust in the Real Property Records in Boone County. John immediately borrowed $5,000 under this United Bank Loan so he could make the January 2009 interest payment on the Peter Loan.

On December 15, 2009, one of John’s business partners, Larry, obtained a judgment (the “Larry Judgment”) against John for $25,000 in connection with a lawsuit between them. The law suit was originally filed in July of 2008. Larry promptly recorded the Larry Judgment.

On December 18, 2009 Henry, also obtained a judgment against John for $10,000 for lumber he had sold to John in 2008 for a deck on the House. Henry immediately filed the judgment in Bell County because he mistakenly believed that house was located in Bell County. Henry subsequently assigned his judgment to his father in law, Festus. Festus paid Henry $1,000 for the judgment.

Each of the following questions should be answered separately. Do not assume facts from one question apply to other questions. I am positing differing factual scenarios and asking you to respond based upon those scenarios.

Question One: Assume that John defaulted in the payment of the Peter note on January 15, 2017. Peter has sent several demand letters to John, but John has still not cured his default. Peter has come to you. He wants to foreclose on the Peter Deed of Trust. What additional information would you need to know in order to advise him about the proper actions he should take? What steps would you take to foreclose on the Peter Deed of Trust.

Question Two: Assume that Festus comes to you. He wants to get his $10,000 judgment paid. He wants you to get the sheriff of Bell County to sell the House to pay off his judgment. What advice would you give him?

Question Three: Assume that Larry has succeeded in having the House sold for $100,000 at a sheriff’s sale in his attempt to secure payment of his $25,000 judgment. What additional information do you need to determine how the sales proceeds should be distributed? Based upon this information how do you think the $100,000 should be distributed?

ESSAY QUESTION TWO

Bob, a commercial real estate broker and member of the City Council of the town of Salt Flats, approached his friend, Roy, a local personal injury lawyer, with the following business proposition. Bob has found out from a friend at Big Gas Company, that their geologists believe that there is a lot of natural gas under a part of Salt Flats. Bob knows that if the preliminary tests prove correct, Big Gas will start contacting property owners in about 6 months trying to lease the mineral rights. Most of this land is located in the poorer working class neighborhoods in Salt Flats.

Bob proposes to go door to door in these poor neighborhoods, offering to find a buyer to purchase these houses. Bob would be paid his 6% real estate commission on any sales. Roy and Bob would form a partnership to purchase the houses called Salt Lick Partnership.

This new partnership could then enter into the leases with Big Gas for the mineral rights and Bob and Roy could make a lot of money. Roy has just won a large personal injury case and his fee was over $1,000,000 so he is excited about having an investment opportunity like this.

Bob finds 50 homeowners who are willing to sign contracts to sell their homes to Salt Lick Partnership. Roy prepares the Salt Lick Partnership Agreement. He also prepares a standard form purchase contract for the houses. The purchase price for each home is 110% of the tax appraised value (based on the property tax records) and the sales are all in cash and close in 30 days. The average sales price per house is $20,000. The contracts also provide that each seller may lease the house back from the Salt Lick Partnership and most sellers enter into leases. Roy also prepares these standard form leases. Bob tells the sellers that these “standard form documents” were prepared by “Roy, one of the best lawyers in the city.” Roy’s name is well known to many of the sellers because of his aggressive radio and television advertising. None of the buyers hires their own lawyer to look at the purchase contracts or leases.

All of the closings of the house purchases take place at Peoples Title Company, which issues the title insurance policies in favor of Salt Lick Partnership in the amounts of the purchases prices. Lawyers representing Peoples Title Company prepare the general warranty deeds and other closing documents. Roy’s law firm sends a lot of business to Peoples Title Company. Prior to the first of the closings, Donna, the employee who is handling the closings and Roy’s personal friend asks Roy, “Why are you buying so many rent houses? Are you planning to become a slum lord?” Roy brags and tells Donna, that “Just between you and me, Donna, Bob and I are going to make a fortune off of these investments” He then explains to Donna about the potential Big Gas Company leases.

A few months later, Big Gas Company starts contacting homeowners offering to pay each a signing bonus of $15,000 if they lease their minerals to Big Gas. Under the terms of the mineral leases that Big Gas Company is offering, each home owner could make a lot more money from royalties. The Salt Lick Partnership signs mineral leases with Big Gas for all 50 houses that the partnership had purchased from homeowners.

Questions:

1) Several of the people who sold their homes to Salt Lick Partnership have heard about these large signing bonuses and lucrative mineral leases that their neighbors are receiving and signing. They come to you and ask you to represent them. What advice do you have? What rights, remedies and causes of action do they have?

2) Bob comes to you. He has just received a demand letter from an attorney representing several of the people who sold houses to the Salt Lick Partnership. The attorney is threatening to sue Bob. What advice would you give Bob about his potential liabilities, if any? What causes of action, if any, does Bob have and against whom for what?

3) Roy comes to you. He too has received a demand letter from the same attorney as the one who wrote Bob, also threatening to sue. What advice would you give Roy about his potential liabilities, if any? What causes of action, if any, does Roy have, and against whom?

Answered Same Day Dec 26, 2021

Solution

David answered on Dec 26 2021
121 Votes
1

Running Header: Contractual terms and obligations:
Title: Contractual terms and obligations
Presented By:
Presented To:
Date: 15/6/2017

























2

Preface:
The total cost of the house which is sold to John by peter is about $100,000 in cost on January 15, 2008.
The amount paid by John to peter is $50,000. The balance amount is bound by promissory note and with
the deed of trust. The mutually agreed interest rate is 10% per year for ten year and the principal
alance will be paid in full on the tenth anniversary of the note on January 15, 2018.

PART I

Case: 1
Assuming that the John has defaulted the payment of the peter note on January 15, 2017. Peter has sent
several demand letters to john and did not get his default cured. In such case the peter’s deed of trust
and subsequent rights the trustee (Peter) possess will become the guiding principles to decide the
course of action of Peter. According to the rule there should be foreclosure to safeguard the interests of
the Peter. Hence there is chance for selling the property (the house) and securing the balance debt
which John is owned to Peter and the balance can be paid back to John. However there are few issues in
this scenario which need to be paid attention for. Firstly the foreclosure in this case cannot be enacted
y judicial foreclosure as there it is deed of trust. This should be done in accordance with the rules of
performance of a power of sale clause. This should also be informed to the peter about the risks
associated with the deed of trust based property selling procedures, the purchaser may face legal
complications if there are unfortunate incidents surfaced after the completion of the sale, since the
judicial intervention is minimum in this case, there is scope for the purchaser to face legal complications
in case of any discrepancy. Another important issue is that the Peter has not actually recorded his deed
of trust, which is a serious blunder. An unrecorded deed of trust will let him loose his legal priorities in
securing his loan back. If there are any challengers for the legal rights of the peter in securing the
property sold, and if their deed of trusts are recorded, then their priorities will be higher than peters. In
any case as it is deed of trust peter should follow the procedures pursuant to the law in selling the
property, all the interested parties must be given notice of the sale. This intimation need to be published
in all the local newspapers as well as in the public notice columns for certain period of time as required
y the statute. Also the sale should be open to the public and this in turn will ensure that the property
will be sold at the fair market price (Council, 1997).

Case: 2
At the outset Festus credentials to get the credit paid off are to be validated. He claims that he need to
get $10,000 judgment to be paid. Actually the judgment in that case is not actually filed in the right
county. The bell county is the not the right location to file the judgment. The house is located in pine
view and Festus need to take immediate action to file the judgment in the pine view county so that the
concerned sheriff will take immediate actions to let him get his $10,000 judgment paid back. According
to the statute I will be advising Festus to forego his attempts of recovery through the sheriff of Bell
County, as he will not be the authorized person to take up the appropriate actions. However the
judgment is already made and as he has all the valid evidence to support his stand and judicial rights to
get his money back, he should immediately take an action to file the judgment with the sheriff of the
pine view county. Subsequently he can even take up the help of the...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here