Criteria | HIGH DISTINCTION 85%-100% | DISTINCTION 75%-84% | CREDIT 65%-74% | PASS 50%-64% | FAIL |
Work applies principles of economics correctly to realistic situations. | Applies correct economic principles, analysis is substantiated with workings, and calculations in order to arrive at the right answer. There are negligible errors/no errors in calculations. | Applies correct economic principles, description is substantiated with workings, and calculations in order to arrive at the right answer. There are negligible errors/no errors in calculations. | Applies correct economic principles, description is substantiated with workings, and calculations in order to arrive at the right answer. There are minor errors in calculations. | Applies correct economic principles, shows workings and calculations but contains some errors. | Applies limited or no understanding of relevant principles. Working and calculations are either not shown or contain major errors. |
Use diagrams in your answers to provide a more comprehensive response. | Diagrams created by students are correctly and precisely labelled, relevant to the specific question, and used appropriately to demonstrate their high-level understanding of all key economic concepts and principles. | Diagrams created by students are correctly and clearly labelled, relate to the specific questions and demonstrate a clear understanding of all key economic concepts and principles. | Diagrams created by students are correct with an attempt at labelling that maybe unclear/incorrect, and demonstrate an understanding of most of the key economic concepts and principles required in this task. | Diagrams created by students are mostly correct with an attempt at labelling, are relevant to the specific question, and demonstrate some understanding of basic economic concepts and principles. | No diagrams provided or they are incorrect, poorly labelled or irrelevant to the specific question. The diagram fails to demonstrate the students understanding of economic concepts and principles. |
Work applies principles of economics correctly in discussing results, conclusions, and/or recommendations. | Principles are applied in the appropriate manner to arrive at the correct answer. Written work shows analysis in order to interpret and make highly complex recommendations relating to economic principles covered in this subject. | Principles are applied in the appropriate manner to arrive at the correct answer. Written work attempts to analyse, and shows the ability to interpret and make recommendations to economic principles covered in this subject. | Principles are applied in the appropriate manner to arrive at the correct answer. Written work shows the ability to interpret and make some key recommendations to economic principles covered in this subject. | Discussion reflects basic understanding of relevant principles. Some inclusion of relevant recommendations. | Principles are not applied appropriately; correct answer is not provided. Written work does not make suitable/relevant recommendations to economic principles covered in this subject. |
Information, spelling, grammar and written expression is set out in a coherent manner, with professional presentation. Appropriate use of font, formatting, diagrams etc., where relevant. | Pass Sustained, consistent and logical presentation of work. Accurate spelling and grammar, excellent written expression and syntax. Appropriate referencing of articles and web-sites. | Structure of work does not demonstrate a consistent and logical presentation format. Inaccurate spelling and use of grammar, inconsistent written expression. Incomplete or inaccurate referencing. |
| | | | | | |