Bachelor of Community Mental Health, Alcohol and Other Drugs
Subject: XXXXXXXXXXAssessment: XXXXXXXXXXLecturer:
Student Name: XXXXXXXXXXStudent #:
There is no exact fit between the criteria and marks, for example perceived comprehension of your work may be weakened by poor
expression. Alternatively, a well-written, creative assignment that does not answer the specific question will be considered a fail.
High Distinction
(80-100%)
Distinction
(70-79%)
Credit Pass
(60-69%)
Pass
(50-59%)
Not satisfactory
(0-49%)
Comprehension and
Argument
25%
An excellent understanding of
concepts throughout. Clear,
logical argument. Excellent
comprehension of the
assignment topic.
A clear understanding of
concepts throughout. Very
good comprehension of the
assignment topic.
An understanding of relevant
concepts is apparent. Shows
comprehension of the
assignment topic.
Average understanding of
elevant concepts throughout.
Shows some comprehension
of the assignment topic.
Poor understanding of
elevant concepts throughout.
Poor comprehension of the
assignment topic.
Content and Critical
Thinking
30%
All content is relevant. High
level of critical thinking. Well
esearched with reference to
and comprehension of
several peer-reviewed
papers.
Content is relevant. Good
level of critical thinking. Well
esearched with reference to
and comprehension of peer-
eviewed papers.
Content is relevant.
Reasonable level of critical
thinking. There is reference
to and comprehension of
peer-reviewed papers.
Content is relevant in some
places. Some evidence of
critical thinking. Research
papers have been used but
only average comprehension
is apparent.
Content is not relevant. No
evidence of critical thinking.
Research is lacking and
comprehension is poor.
Structure and
Organisation/Logic
20%
Structure of the information
presented is excellent.
Information is organised and
detailed.
Structure of information is
very good and information
presented in a logical
manner.
Structure of information is
mostly clear and presented in
a logical manner.
Information structure is
average and is unclear in
parts.
Structure of argument is
lacking. Logical argument is
poor.
Expression and
Grammar
15%
English expression is very
clear and concise throughout
and terminology compliments
the argument. Grammar is
co
ect throughout.
English expression is clear
and concise throughout.
Terminology is appropriate
and complements the
argument. Very few
grammatical e
ors.
English expression is clear
throughout. Terminology is
appropriate in most instances.
Some grammatical e
ors.
There are some problems
with expression and
terminology. There are
grammatical e
ors.
Poor expression and use of
grammar throughout.
Formatting and
Referencing
10%
Times new roman, size 12
and lines double-spaced.
Appropriate title and student
information. APA referencing
is co
ect and all references in
text match those in the
eference list.
Times new roman, size 12
and lines double-spaced.
Appropriate title and student
information. APA referencing
is mostly co
ect and all
eferences in text match
those in the reference list.
Formatting is generally
co
ect. Some formatting
e
ors. APA referencing is
generally co
ect with
occasional e
ors.
Formatting is generally
co
ect but there are e
ors.
APA referencing needs work.
Document formatting and
APA referencing style are
inco
ect.