Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Curtin University Curtin Law School Semester 1, 2017 Take Home Test 2 Unit Name: Fundamentals of Business and Corporations Law Unit Number & Version: BLAW5016 Duration: You are required to attempt a...

1 answer below »

Curtin University

Curtin Law School

Semester 1, 2017

Take Home Test 2

Unit Name: Fundamentals of Business and Corporations Law

Unit Number & Version: BLAW5016

Duration: You are required to attempt a take home test from 5pm on Friday 19 May to 9am on Monday 22 May. The take home test requires you to write an answer to a problem question dealing with materials from Lectures 7, 8, and 9 of the semester program. The test must be submitted through Turnitin in Blackboard before 9am on Monday 22 May WST. Marks will be deducted for late submission.

You will not be awarded marks for copying directly from any textbook or legislation.

The take home test has a word limit of 2000words and it must be typed/word processed unless prior agreement has been obtained from your tutor. The take home test will not be assessed if it exceeds 2000words. Please ensure that you have checked the document for spelling and grammar before submission.

The take home test MUST be submitted ELECTRONICALLY.

Please observe the following requirements:

Font: - Times or similar font - no smaller than 12 point in size

Spacing: - 1.5 line spacing, and appropriate paragraph spacing

Margin: - at least 2.5cm on the top, left, right & bottom

Pages: - Numbered in top or bottom margin

Paper: - A4 size paper

The take home test must be accompanied with the cover sheet provided with the test and must be received by 9am WST on Monday 22 May.

Once you are satisfied that your take home test is ready for submission, you should save it with a filename as below:

Student ID_FirstnameLastname.doc

For example: 12345678_JohnSmith.doc or 12345678TakehometestJohnSmith.doc

It is important that you don’t include characters other than your student number, underscores and your student name. This means do not include characters such as * or / or ANY SPACES IN THE FILE NAME.

Please ensure that you click on the submit buttonto upload your take home test.

Failure to submit the take home test by the due date may result in a zero mark for that part of the assessment.

Total Marks: 25 Marks comprising 25% of the final subject grade.

QUESTION

Josh, a qualified motor vehicle mechanic, operated a sole trading business in West Perth. His business mainly involved repairing and servicing prestigious motor vehicles from Luke’s car yard located next to his mechanic shop. Five years ago, Josh and Luke decided to go into business together and registered a company Josh Luke Pty Ltd, with the intention that Josh would look after the repair and mechanics of motor vehicles and Luke would look after the sale of used prestigious motor vehicles. The company issued 300,000 $1 shares to Luke and 200,000 $1 shares to Josh. Both Josh and Luke transferred their businesses to the company in exchange for the shares. Josh and Luke were appointed as the directors of Josh Luke Pty Ltd.

The company’s business became very successful and required more capital, so two years ago they decided to convert their company into a public company, Josh Luke Ltd with the following constitution:

“The provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) shall apply to this company except for the following:

1. The company shall only operate a used car dealership business of prestigious cars.”

2. Henry Hall shall be appointed as the managing director of the company for a term of five years.

3. The company’s business can only be changed with the approval of all the directors.

Josh Luke Ltd now has a large number of shareholders through the issue of 1million $2 shares to the public. The directors of the company are Josh, Luke and Henry.

Six months ago, Henry placed an order to import ten new electric cars from Korea as he felt confident of the demand for electric cars. Josh and Luke are most displeased with Henry as they feel that without charging stations, electric cars will not be as successful as used prestigious cars. Josh and Luke would like to cancel the Korean electric car order on the following basis:

1. It is beyond Josh Luke Ltd’s capacity to enter into such a contract and the Korean company should have known this; and

2. Henry Hall did not have the authority to enter into such a contract without the approval of all the directors of Josh Luke Ltd.

REQUIRED:

1. Advise Josh and Luke of the advantages and disadvantages of operating their business:

(i) separately;

(ii) as Josh Luke Pty Ltd; and

(iii) as Josh Luke Ltd.

[4 Marks]

2. Discuss the procedure and the legal requirements that need to be satisfied to convert the company from Josh Luke Pty Ltd to Josh Luke Ltd. Also include in your answer whether a new company is created after the conversion.

[3 Marks]

3. Discuss whether Josh and Luke are likely to be successful in cancelling the Korean electric car order on the basis that it is beyond Josh Luke Ltd’s capacity to enter into such a contract and the Korean company should have known this.

[5 Marks]

4. Discuss whether Josh and Luke are likely to be successful in cancelling the Korean electric car order on the basis that Henry Hall did not have the authority to enter into such a contract without the approval of all the directors of Josh Luke Ltd.

[6 Marks]

5. Can Henry Hall enforce the clause in the company’s constitution and remain a managing director for five years.

[4 Marks]

4 step process, writing style and referencing [3 Marks]

TOTAL 25 MARKS

Note:

1. Reference your answers to cases and the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) where possible.

2. In answering some parts of the questions, a formal 4 step process may not be required. However, if application is required, please write the law before applying to solve the problem.

3. You do not need to consider whether the directors have breached their duties when answering this question.

4. You do not have to discuss or apply Contract Law.

See Guidelines for Test 2 on the next page.

GUIDELINES FOR TEST 2

Where the question requires you to use the 4 step process, the 4 steps are:

- Step 1: Introduce the area of the law

- Step 2: Discuss the applicable law to solve and quote relevant cases and the sections of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) where applicable.

- Step3: Apply the law to the facts to resolve the problem.

- Step 4: Come to a conclusion

When writing your answers for Test 2, you cannot copy word for word from another source. You can paraphrase or summarise ideas or data obtained from another source, so long as you reference the source of your information using the AGLC footnote referencing style. More information can be found on this style from blackboard or the Curtin library web site:www.library.curtin.edu.au. A Bibliography is NOT required under the AGLC footnote referencing system.

Please note that plagiarism occurs when work of another person is presented as one’s own, without appropriate acknowledgement or referencing. Plagiarism is a serious offence. This unit is ascribed to Turnitin, an electronic plagiarism detection service. Students should be aware that their work will be required to be submitted to this service to check for unacknowledged use of others’ work. Please read Test 2 submission process carefully to determine how to submit your test through Turnitin.

The research for legal principles and cases can be restricted to that referred in the prescribed text book, lectures and case studies. You will not be awarded marks for referring to cases or legislation outside these sources.

You should not exceed the word limit stated in the questions. The marks for each part should give an indication of the words that should be allocated for that part. You should check the rubric to ascertain how marks are allocated and the criteria that will be used to assess your level of achievement. Marks will be deducted for exceeding the word limit.

Answered Same Day Dec 26, 2021

Solution

David answered on Dec 26 2021
130 Votes
Company Formation and Business Law Case Analysis
Introduction
The report aims to provide information about the different types of organizational
establishment under the law and their benefits and shortcomings. It also discusses the
importance of contract law.
Advise Josh and Luke of the advantages and disadvantages of operating their business:
(i) Separately;
(ii) As Josh Luke Pty Ltd; and
(iii) As Josh Luke Ltd.
Answer
1. Separately
The advantage of sole proprietorship are explained below
The advantages of the sole proprietorship are the low start up cost because it does not require
a business structure and there are minimum people requirement for the company registration.
It enjoys greater freedom from regulations. The corporation has to pay the initial formation
fee, filing fee and other annual state fees but these fees are not applicable over the sole
proprietorship. Corporation can be created by the state and legal documents and it must
adhere with the formality that considers the holding director and a
angement of shareholder
meeting, recording of corporate minutes and creating a board of directors but the sole
proprietorship does not require such a
angements and compliance with regulations. It does
not require even a handwritten agreement. The sole proprietorship is not responsible for the
unemployment insurance. The shareholders and employees of company have to pay
unemployment insurance but in sole proprietorship this is not required. The owner can have
the direct control over the decision making. Total control in decision making can be enjoyed
y the organization but in partnership firms and corporations this is not possible. there is a
minimum capital requirement
The tax advantage is offered to owner because there are not much regulations placed over the
sole proprietorship. The benefits will be accrued by the owner only.
But there are various disadvantages as well attached with the sole proprietorship. Owner has
to take unlimited liability. The owner has to be responsible but this is not the case of
partnership and company because the liability and risk factors are distributed and shared.
Lack of continuity is also possible in case of owner is absent. All the important meeting as
well as signature over the important documents may be pending. The capital raising is also a
difficult task. There is not pr4otection of the name as the name does not have any legal entity
Considering the advantages and disadvantages for the future expansion and exploitation of
opportunities it is not feasible for the Josh and Luke to run their business separately.
Advantage and disadvantage of a private company
The advantage of having a private company is mentioned here. The private limited company
can be formed by only 2 people. The minimum directors can be 2 in the private limited
company. the statutory meeting is optional. The issue of prospectus is not required. For the
quorum 2 members must present. There are less legal restrictions as well But the
disadvantage is that public subscription is not allowed. The transfer of shares is also
estricted.
Therefore as the three directors in company josh, Luke and Henry where the two directors
josh and Luke have conflict with the Henry, it is recommended that they should form a Josh
Luke pty ltd. The reason is that the scope of pty ltd company is far more than the sole
proprietorship. Later when they find a suitable partner, they can go for josh Luke public ltd.
But cu
ently as they do not have at least seven members to make a public limited company
and they do not have sufficient funds as well to establish a public ltd company it is
ecommended that they should go with the option two.
As the company can have the continuous operation and specialised knowledge it is
ecommended that Josh and Luke should consider this option.
The major difference between the private limited company and public limited company is
aising the public capital and indefinite members but Josh and Luke has converted from
company from pty limited to public company and had conflict with Henry they may have to
seek more people to create a desirable structure for public company.
The analysis of three options reveals that the most prefe
ed option is public limited company
ut due to the conflict with Henry, they may chose to go with option two. There is a clause
that mentions that Henry would by the managing director of company for five years
otherwise the public limited status of company will be dissolved therefore in the cu
ent
scenario, opting for public ltd company may be a difficult option for...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here