Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Case Study Project: Business Law Instructions: This project brings together everything you have learned, with particular attention to the law of Contracts and Agency, in one project. · You have been...

1 answer below »
Case Study Project: Business Law
Instructions: This project
ings together everything you have learned, with particular attention to the law of Contracts and Agency, in one project.
· You have been provided a separate file with a copy of a written contract and addenda related to the fact pattern.
· Using the case study description and materials provided, provide detailed responses to the six questions below. Answers should be submitted in essay form.
· Each answer needs to be at least two pages, double-spaced per question.
This case study and its materials are so absurdly fictitious that there is no way that this could happen in “real life,” this Case Study is based upon a case that went to the Utah Supreme Court, with some fictitious elements added to test your knowledge and understanding of additional concepts than were at issue in the original case. This kind of thing can and does happen. Please note that there are discrepancies, inconsistencies and other problems in the case description and other materials. This is intentional. Nearly all real cases have internal inconsistencies and other factual problems. Your job is to decide whether those problems are material to the legal questions raised and, if so, how they impact your decision-making. You may decide that if the facts are resolved one way over another, then the legal conclusions may be different. In your answers, you will want to explore and detail out these alternative possibilities. In presenting your answers, you should be as thorough and detailed as possible, “showing your work,” as it were, in how you a
ived at your conclusions.
Case Study Questions:
1. Is there a contract between any of the parties? If there is a contract(s), describe and detail the operative legal principles, how you a
ived at that conclusion, and identify the parties to that contract and the contract’s terms.
2. There were several purportedly contractual negotiations or transitions in the case description. If you decided that some of those transactions do not qualify as a contract, detail and describe why.
3. Identify any defenses to enforcement that any of the parties may have and against whom they would be asserted, and whether those defenses would be successful and why.
4. Identify the available remedies that any party could request of a court, and whether a court is able or likely to provide that remedy and why.
5. Describe how the concept of agency effected the parties’ legal positions in the case study. Did the agents help or harm their clients? Why?
6. If you were the judge on this case and all the parties named in the case description were party to the lawsuit, how would you resolve the case and why? Who would end up with the property and on what terms? Who would get nothing and why?
CASE STUDY: Jon D'Man grew up in a small town in eastern Oregon. Jon played sports and was good enough to earn a scholarship in baseball to his favorite university in Utah. Marsha Mello grew up in New York City, as a Manhattenite. Although growing up in New York had its advantages, she longed to see the wide open spaces of the western United States, and she applied to the same university in Utah that Jon was attending. Marsha was a big fan of baseball and loved attending games to support her school. She fell in love with the star player, Jon. One fateful game Jon was sliding into third and caught a spike and tore the ligaments in his knee and ankle. This accident ended his professional dreams at the young age of 17. Jon and Marsha decided they would get ma
ied in four (4) years when they graduated. Jon had a settlement from his injury and a good-paying, part-time job. Marsha had a large inheritance from her grandmother, to be used only for educational related expenses. They decided to buy a home together even though Jon was only 17 and Marsha was 21. But they wondered what they needed to do to buy a home. Jon and Marsha were both accounting students and were taking a wonderful Business Law class together from a wonderful professor-the same one you now have. They had a limited knowledge of contracts, but they knew they should employ a Real Estate Agent to facilitate their purchase. They called a local hot-shot realtor to help them find the perfect property to start their life together. After much searching, they found a 3 bedroom 2 bath home on a nice cul-de-s8c in a quiet, newer neighborhood on the outskirts of town. They sat down with their Agent to fill out their offer to purchase on a Utah Real Estate Purchase Contract (REPC). They discussed the home and its amenities. They loved the fact that the home had an outdoor, portable hot tub under the stars. It could be easily moved under cover into the carport in bad weather. They also loved the appliances that were in the kitchen. They particularly loved the 6-burner, Maytag gas range. They decided to ask for them to be included in the purchase price. The home was listed on the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) for which seemed to be a little high for the neighborhood. Jon and Marsha decided to offer $207,000 with the seller paying 3% towards closing costs and for title insurance and for property taxes and for needed repairs. Jon signed the REPC on the line for the Buyer (see Page. 6). In paragraph 25 of the REPC, Jon put the time for acceptance as 12 PM, 25 Fe
uary 2011. The REPC said on P.l that the BUYER had included a post-dated check for $5,000. The
oker marked the box “delivered” even though Marsha did not have her check book with her. She promised the agent that she would
ing it to him ASAP. Buyer’s Broker delivered the REPC to Seller's Broker, through a sales agent on the day after the REPC was completed by Jon and Marsha.
Jon and Marsha had specifically marked the applicable boxes on page #1, Paragraph 1.2 for the washer; the dryer; the frig; the water softener; and the security system. They also marked the required boxes throughout the REPC.
NOTE #1
You will want to read the REPC and the two addenda and ask questions as the different sections of the REPC are covered in the related chapters of the text book.
Seller received the offer on the 21 Fe
uary 2011.
Seller marked, I accept with the following conditions. Buyers' will have one (2) day to accept terms contained in Addendum #1.
See ADDENDUM #1:
Seller returned REPC with Addendum #1 to Buyer's Broker.
Jon marked, I accept on Addendum #1 with the following conditions.
See ADDENDUM #2
Jon had his acceptance notarized the next day and gave it to his Broker, who gave it to the Seller's Broker. Seller's Broker got busy and distracted, and he forgot to give it to the Seller until 10 AM. Broker reminded Seller that she only had until 12AM to respond. Seller said that was ok, because she would put it in the mail by 11 PM, and that would be the time of acceptance. (She knew the mailbox rule) She mailed the acceptance at 10:15 PM. She immediately had seller's remorse and changed her mind. She called the Buyer at 12:30 AM and said on her answering machine, “I reject your offer. The deal is off. I will not sell my home at any price.” The BUYERS had not yet received SELLER'S acceptance. Right after Buyers had mailed their last offer to Seller, but before seller had mailed an acceptance (see addendum #2), UB Flash announced it was building just down the road from Seller's house. Because of this announcement, the value of the Seller's house jumped $100 K. Marsha heard about UB Flash's plans and quickly called Seiler's Broker on the phone and told him that she would like to accepted seller's offer on seller's terms (see Addendum #1). She told Seller's Broker she could close by 15 April 2011. Seller's Broker was way excited to make a sale. And without contacting seller, Seller's Broker told Buyer, “I accept your offer. You have just bought yourselves a house.” Marsha said, “Fantastic. I’ve got all the money for the house in a trust.” That same day, Buyer #2 who is an undisclosed agent for UB Flash, offers the Seiler over the phone $300K cash with no conditions, as is, close in 10 days. Buyer #2 promises a $20,000 non-refundable earnest money with the oral offer. Seller does not know of her Agents actions with Marsha; therefore, she, the Seller, promises to sign the REPC as soon as buyer #2 mails it to her. She tells buyer #2, “I accept with no reservations or conditions.” Jon learns of seller's intent to sell to Buyer #2 and sues to enforce his rights under his REPC.

REAL ESTATE PURCHASE CONTRACT
This is a legally binding Real Estate Purchase Contract ("REPC"). Utah law requires real estate licensees to use this form. Buyer and Seller,
however, may agree to alter or delete its provisions or to use a different form. If you desire legal or tax advice, consult your attorney or tax
advisor.
OFFER TO PURCHASE AND EARNEST MONEY DEPOSIT
On this ^O day of rtfP^ 20 \l ("Offer Reference Date") JOO £ M A^-^-HA ("Buyer")
offers to purchase from ^^teJEKJ T* ~^>E¥XL— ("Seller") the Property described below and
[ ] delivers to the Buyer's Brokerage with this offer, or [ ] agrees to deliver no later than four (4) calendar days
after Acceptance (as defined in Section 23), Earnest Money in the amount of S'SQQO"" in the form
of PgRL After Acceptance of the REPC by Buyer and Seller, and receipt of the
Earnest Money by the Brokerage, the Brokerage shall have four (4) calendar days in which to deposit the Earnest Money
into the Brokerage Real Estate Trust Account.
Buyer's Brokerage SOK. (£ S> UQOT&Q Phone:
ature above acknowledges receipt
Received by: Wf ^A^l on Q 3i£> \ f (Date)
(Signature above acknowledges receipt of Earnest Money)
i^ ^ a ^ OTHER PROVISIONS
1. PROPERTY: IZ3A COL^E^AC LAkfe
also described as:
City of (CJ^£V\ ,County of UT ,State of Utah, Zipffifrft?*? (the "Property").
Any reference below to the term"Property" shall include the Property describedabove, togetherwith the Included Itemsand
water rights/water shares, if any, referenced in Sections 1.1,1.2 and 1.4.
1.1 Included Items. Unless excluded herein, this sale includes the following items if presently owned and in place
on the Property: plumbing, heating, air conditioning fixtures and equipment; ovens, ranges and hoods; cook tops;
dishwashers; ceiling fans; water heaters; light fixtures and bulbs; bathroom fixtures and bathroom mi
ors; curtains,
Answered Same Day Aug 07, 2021

Solution

Swati answered on Aug 08 2021
157 Votes
Case Study Questions
1. Is there a contract between any of the parties? If there is a contract(s), describe and detail the operative legal principles, how you a
ived at that conclusion, and identify the parties to that contract and the contract’s terms.
Contract is a promise that is enforced legally; it is a legal obligation resulting due to agreement of parties as affected by the Act and other law rules which are applicable to situation. Yes, there is contract between buying and selling parties in this case. There is filling of REPC which is Real Estate Purchase contract between the two parties- Buyer party Jon D’Man & Marsha Mello and seller party Boren T. Deal. Jon and Marsha wanted to start their life in a new house, so to buy a perfectly fit house for them, they met with a Utah real estate agent and with his help they found a suitable house after much search that suited their future needs. First addendum sent by Buyer to seller offering $2,07,000 with seller paying 3% of closing costs, title insurance, needed repairs and property taxes. In line with REPC, Jon put the acceptance time as 25th Fe
uary, 12 PM. This offer was received by seller on 21st Fe
uary wherein seller marked it as accepted with the condition for buyer to accept it within 24 hours. Acceptance was mailed by seller at 10:45 pm. Within the acceptance time, seller has mailed it after accepting making this contract is valid. Also, after the UB newsflash, Marsha offered to accept the seller’s terms realizing possible price shoot and called seller’s agent to give counteroffer with raised price and no terms and conditions. Now, as there is acceptance from the agent of seller within the acceptance time stated in Addendum 2, this would be considered as valid contract. Also, as per section 23 of REPC act, when following have occu
ed, there is clear “Acceptance”- (i) Buyer or seller has signed offer or counteroffer indicating acceptance of contract (ii) There has been communication by seller or buyer or seller’s agent or buyer’s agent that the offer or counteroffer has been signed as per requirement. Both of these requirements were fulfilled before the seller communicated with buyer 2 and sent a counteroffer (addendum 2). It was indicated by the seller that she would sell home if requirements mentioned in addendum 1 are fulfilled by the buyer. On behalf of seller, agent of seller has accepted the offer making it a valid contract. The seller must now sell her house to Buyers at price of $2,00,000 with listed terms incorporated as a part of REPC which are security systems being rented, water softener, inclusion of a range, mandatory mediation along with payment of concession maximum be $3000 and selling house as it is without any wa
anties. Though, second offer made by Marsha was not authorized by seller, the agent of seller had authority to accept or reject it and he accepted the offer without informing the seller. The buyer being student of business law was all aware about the authority of seller’s agent as well as his acceptance authority. Thus, acceptance of Marsha’s offer by seller’s agent put them in a contract. The contract here is between the buyer Jon & Marsha and the seller.
2. There were several purportedly contractual negotiations or transitions in the case description. If you decided that some of those transactions do not qualify as a contract, detail and describe why.
Purportedly contractual negotiations in this case study includes original offer made by buyers for $2,07,000 wherein seller will be responsible for paying 3% closing costs, property taxes, repairing costs, title insurance. This offer did not qualify as contract even after being agreed upon as accepted and dropped in the mailbox. This is because, in the stipulated timelines, Marsha (buyer) called up the seller’s agent with a counteroffer of $2,20,000 along with accepting terms and conditions of the seller. This made the original offer not qualified as contract.
Another contractual negotiation was revocation by seller towards acceptance of addendum 2. As per the mailbox rule, it is clearly stated that acceptance of offer is elective as soon as it is sent. Once the letter is placed in the mailbox, there may be no more revoking of the addendum as acceptance is already being made. But there is one contractual stipulation to this ruling which is in Addendum 1. It states that there is 24 hours time with the buyer to respond by either accepting or countering. Addendum 1 could have been possibly voided out by this. Also, an argument could be made regarding addendum 1 being void as seller agreed on the addendum 2 and clearly counteroffers overpowers the previous or original offer as per law.
Also, the negotiations made by the seller to the buyer 2 without closing the deal legally with the buyers 1 does not qualify as contract reason being the mandatory requirement as per addendum 1 of having a mediator was missed out first of all making it void. Also, as per contract law, REPC cannot open two deals at one time. Being already in the valid contact with the buyers 1 and sellers, there is no chance of getting into contract with another buyer which is buyer 2 in this case. Though the offer made by buyer 2 was more considerable and potentially profitable against a huge amount, the seller had already gone in contract with buyers1 because of acceptance of Marsha’ s counteroffer by seller’s agent making them entering contract. These are the purportedly contractual negotiations in the case descriptive which do not reflect as valid contract. Also, transition of negotiations started from $2, 07,000 in original offer followed by telephonic counter offer from buyer side at $2,20,000 where as buyer 2 has made offer of $3,00,00. Observing this transition, it may look that seller must choose the highest negotiated value but as...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here