Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Business and Corporate Law Written Report of maximum 2,000 words must be in MS Word format, no spacing, 12-pt Arial font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section...

1 answer below »
Business and Corporate Law
Written Report of maximum 2,000 words must be in MS Word format, no spacing, 12-pt Arial font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings and page numbers. • Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (AGLC) style.
Marking criteria
Identification of material facts involved in problem question.
Identification of legal issues / legal question and relevant law.
Thorough yet succinct application of law to material facts.
Citation and referencing.
Professional quality.
Assignment Questions
Part A: Contracts Law Question
• Read the Contracts Law question below.
• In 1,000 words (+/- 10% is allowed), answer your chosen question using the IRAC method.
• Your answer must be supported by relevant law and cases decided by Australian courts (preferably the High Court) and/or scholarly articles. A minimum of 3 genuine and relevant references are required for this part of the report.
• Your references must be listed in a Reference list at the end of the Part A question.
Rhino Distillery, a famous whiskey distillery, placed the following advertisement in the Avid Angler magazine on 25 January:
‘Calling all anglers of all ages and levels! Come one, come all! Fishermen and women of Placid River. We are offering prize money of $75,000 to any angler who reels in Misterjaw, a giant ba
amundi which we have tagged and released into the river.’
The following day was the Australia Day holiday. Placid River was crowded with people fishing from the bank and from boats. At around noon, a rumour spread among the people on the bank that there had been an e
or in the advertisement: that the true amount should have been $7,500 and that Rhino Distiller had announced that the prize would be the lower amount. The rumour was in fact true.
Georgie Lang, known to his friends as “Gorka”, had heard this rumour from the stranger fishing beside him, minutes before catching Misterjaw. A Rhino Distillery representative was present to certify the catch before Misterjaw was released back into the river, but did not say anything about the amount of the prize money.
In the meantime, Tyler Henry, also known as “Hank” among the local angler aficionados, was fishing from his boat and did not hear the rumour. Hank was so sure that he would catch Misterjaw and claim the prize. He returned every weekend until he finally caught Misterjaw on Christmas Eve.
Gorka now claims that Rhino Distillery owes him $75,000. Hank also claims that Rhino Distillery owes him that prize money. Advise Rhino Distillery, explaining applicable legal principles and citing relevant authorities on:
(1) Whether the company is liable to pay Gorka the $75,000 prize.
(2) Whether the company is liable to pay Hank the $75,000 prize.
Part B: Business Structures question
• Read the questions below on Business Structures.
• In 1,000 words (+/- 10% is allowed), answer the chosen given question.
• A minimum of 3 genuine and relevant references are required for this part of the report. Examples of relevant references for this question include the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth); the Australian and Securities and Investment Commission’s (ASIC) website (www.asic.gov.au), the website of the Australian Business Register’s (ABR) website (www.a
.gov.au).
• Your references must be listed in a Reference list at the end of the Part B question.
A music promoter has had an offer to
ing a famous musical group from England to Australia, as part of its world tour to promote its new album. The music promoter has done smaller tours previously, but nothing on the scale proposed by the manager of this famous group, the tour will cost several million dollars, but is likely to have revenue which will result in substantial profits for those involved.
The promoter has some contacts at a national radio station which can promote the tour, and there is at least one financier who is interested in financing the tour in return of course for a share of the revenue from the tour.
The promoter is calling for a meeting of the different interested parties, he is not sure what business organisation would be best to manage and conduct the proposed tour, particularly as it is going to involve various diverse entities, each with their own separate business interests.
Explain:
•The options open to the different parties in what business structure they might use to promote the tour;
• The dangers of each type of business structure; and
• Whether there is any means of limiting risks by each party
Answered Same Day Sep 21, 2021

Solution

Jose answered on Sep 23 2021
124 Votes
The University of Queensland
1
Management
Management
Business Law
Individual
Lecturer:
Student Submitting:
Due Date: 23/09/2020
Part – A
Abstract
As per the Australian constitution, for considering contract as valid, we have to focus on the essential elements for the formation of a contract. For granting contract as a valid we have to give importance to the aspect of the offer. Offer simply means presenting something to be accepted or rejected. While making the offer the companies have to consider different aspects. In this research paper, we are analysing solution for law court by using the IRAC method.
Issue
While analysing the case we can understand that company Rhino Distillery made an offer to the public that one who catches the fish ba
amundi and release the fish to the river. The company done the announcement for attracting more customers and the company was successful in getting more number of people. Due to Australian national holiday, lots of people were gathered near to the river they were engaged in fishing. During the noontime, people heard that the company provide only $7500, there is an e
or in the ad provided by the company. Two people were trying to catch the fish for getting prize money. One is Gorka and minutes before he caught the Misterjaw he heard about the rumour and released the fish to the river. Another one is Hank, he did not get any information about the change in the prize, he also caught the fish. Rumour related with the prize money was true and both Gorka and Hank were claiming for getting prize money and the company is in big trouble. The company representative was also there in the scene when Gorka got the fish, but he did not mention anything about the changes in the prize money. 
Relevant Law
While analysing the case we can understand that the case is related to the application of rules related to the general offer. Offer can be called as presenting something to be accepted or rejected. As per Australian contract law, rules for valid general offer consist of;
Creating a legal relationship
While making an offer it has to create a legal relationship between the parties. The offer which is not supported by the law is not valid 
Certain and Clear Terms
Another important rule related to the offer is that the terms and conditions related to offering should be clear and easy to understand. The people who are creating the offer should develop clear terms and it has to clear to the other parties. 
Communicated 
The offer made by parties has to be communicated by using effective medium and the parties are not allowed to use confusing words or statements in the offer. 
Different from invitation to offe
Invitation to offer is not a valid offer, the parties who create offer has to understand the objective for creating the offer (Helvaci 2017,p.30)
As per the Australian Contract Law, we can understand that they are different types of offer;
1. Express  
2. Implied
3. General
4. Specific
5. Cross 
6. Standing 
While analysing the case we can understand that General offer is applicable in the case of Rhino Distillery case. The company made an offer to the public. The terms and conditions explained in the case
Carlill v Ca
olic Smoke Ball is acceptable here. While analysing the case of Carlill v Ca
olic Smoke Ball Co we can understand that the company made an offer to the public, and Carlill accepted the offer, but the company failed to fulfil the offer and Carlill took the company to the court. 
Facts
From the case study, we can understand that the company made a general offer to all the fishermen and women, and the prize money disclosed in the ad was about $75000. The company representative was there in the scene when Gorka got the fish, but he did not mention anything about...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here