Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Assignment 1 Due date: 27 May 2013 Weighting: 25% of the total marks for this course Expected length of answers: 2500 words in total Answer all questions. There are 100 marks in total for this TMA....

1 answer below »
Assignment 1 Due date: 27 May 2013 Weighting: 25% of the total marks for this course Expected length of answers: 2500 words in total Answer all questions. There are 100 marks in total for this TMA. Notes to students 1 Please identify the issues in your answer. There are often several issues in one question. 2 State the legal principle applicable to each issue, including relevant case law and legislation, then analyse the facts and apply the principle to them. 3 Your answer may cover matters not discussed in the study units. Question 1 (60 marks) In September 2012, Mr Fok, a professional driver, collided with a motorcycle while attempting to turn right off Castle Peak Road between Yuen Long and Tuen Mun. The rider of the motorcycle, Mr Chan (a dancer), was badly injured. Mr Fok was given a breathalizer test. That test revealed a concentration of 110 mg of alcohol in 100 ml of breath, some five times the prescribed legal limit. Later, in the Tuen Mun Magistrates’ Courts, Mr Fok was convicted of careless driving and of driving a motor vehicle with an alcoholic concentration in his breath exceeding the prescribed limit. Mr Fok, based on a District Court’s decision in 1997, files an appeal against the sentence to the Court of First Instance. Mr Chan intends to sue Mr Fok and the claim is estimated to be about HK$8 million. In relation to the collision in September 2012, please answer all of the following questions: a Advise Mr Fok on whether he can safely rely on a District Court’s decision in his appeal by explaining the principle describing the situation that higher court decisions are binding on lower courts. (10 marks) b The success of Mr Fok’s appeal depends on how the judge will interpret the phrase ‘without due care and attention’ as appearing in section 38(2) of the Road Traffic Ordinance (Cap 374). Mr Fok wants to know how the judge will interpret the legislation. Advise Mr 2 LAW B262 Business Law I Fok on the three common law rules applicable to the interpretation of legislation with illustrations from relevant legal cases. (20 marks) c Advise Mr Chan as to whether he should initiate criminal or civil proceedings by explaining the differences between the two kinds of proceedings. (20 marks) d Advise Mr Chan on which court he should bring his claim to, and briefly describe the function and duties of this court. (10 marks) Question 2 (40 marks) On Monday, Alan inspected Betty’s car at her house and offered to pay HK$10,000 for it. Betty wanted HK$12,000. Later in the day, Betty wrote to Alan and stated that she would take HK$11,000. The letter was received by Alan at his home on Tuesday morning. At 4 pm on Tuesday afternoon, Alan, at his office, wrote a letter to Betty accepting her offer. On his way to post the letter Alan met Betty’s friend, Catherine, who told him, ‘I gather that Betty has finally sold her car.’ Betty had, indeed, sold the car. Alan posted his letter and, upon arriving home, discovered a message on his telephone recording machine from Betty. The message was left at 3 pm; Betty had stated, ‘I withdraw my offer.’ Later, Alan bought a similar car for HK$12,500. Required: Based on the facts given above, analyse in detail and advise as to whether there is a valid contract between Alan and Betty
Answered Same Day Dec 22, 2021

Solution

David answered on Dec 22 2021
116 Votes
Running Head: LAWS 1
Laws
Running Head: LAWS 2

Answer 1
Answer a):
In the context of legal term under the common law, the first principle is that a legal
judgment that is made by a higher court, or made by the same court in a previous legal
assessment, is a binding example that the court should oblige the judgment itself. At the same
time, it is the responsibility of its inferior courts to follow the judgment without any if or but.
The second principle is that the court could not turn over its past precedent except any strong
eason could not force the court to make the change in existing decisions. It also assists by the
inferior courts and lateral court (Hong Kong, 2013). Sometime, the second principle is based on
the advisory process in which the court could accept or ignore the persuasive precedent on the
asis of situation in cases.
Therefore, Mr. Fok could safely rely on the District Court’s decision with the help of his
decision, if the upper court is given the decision in the favor of plaintiff, if the accused had
drunk. The binding on the court could be decided by the help of “Ratio Decidendi”. Under the
legal system of the country, it could be stated that the District Court is bound to follow the
decision of the CFI. But, only the CIF has a right to make the review the decision of lower court
such as criminal court. Hence, the binding on the courts also describes the binding precedent that
describes the liabilities of lower courts under the hierarchy legal system that also forces the
lower level of court to follow the procedures of upper court, if the similar case comes (Jackson,
2003). But it does not form the binding precedent. It means that the lower court of District court
could make the decision on the basis of the situation of the case without obeying the higher
court. On the other hand, the lower court has not right to make the review of the high court’s
decisions for its proceedings.
Running Head: LAWS 3

In the court system of the country, the District Court has some power to make some
decision but its decisions would produce no binding precedents at all because of the legislative
system of the country. At the same time, the decision of District Court in 1997 would not affect
the procedures of CFI because of the reviewing rights of CIF.
Answer b):
The judge will interpret the legislation under the nature of the accident and the injury of
the plaintiff. The judge is bounded by the past legal judgments and rules and regulation that are
described under the section of 38 and it subsection 2 (Jackson, 2003). Mr. Fok was drunk at the
time of accident. So, the judge will interpret the phrase “without due care and attention” against
Mr. Fok. This phrase describes the liability and responsibilities of the drivers related to the
drivers on the road in the indirect method. This phrase also describes that the driver was driving
his or her vehicle without the proper care.
Therefore, he will interpret the legislation to how the plaintiff could get the maximum
claim for the act of Fok. It is because that drink driving is the most life-threatening offense that is
harmful for all drivers and also ca
ies several risks for the other people that drive over the road.
Hence, the judge would also interpret the legislation about the disqualification of Fok’s driving
licenses.
The judge could interpret the legislation with the help of three rules of common laws that
are given below:
Traditional Approach
The traditional approach based on common law for the interpretation of statutory law that
helps the judge to interpret the legislations related to road accident because it consists three
Running Head: LAWS 4

general rules that have the nature to make the interpretation of the phrase such as “Driving
without due care and attention” under legal procedures:
Literal Rule: This rule is generally focused over to find out the real meaning of the rules
and legislations for helping the judge to proceed the legal activities effectively. This rule also
includes the nature and characteristics that help the judge to conduct the legal process.
Mischief Rule: In the interpretation of any law, this rule plays an important role because it
focuses over the "mischief". It helps the judge to find out the loss of plaintiff and also assist to
justify the required remedy from the side of defense.
Golden Rule: In the interpretation of the laws and legislation, the golden rule also plays a
valuable part because it focuses over how the involved parties could avoid incompatibility. It
also used at a time, when there are two situations and both make some confusion.
Rules of Language:
For justifying the above phrase “Driving without due care and attention”, the judge could
use the rules of language for the interpretation of that legislation,...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here