Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Assessment 2 - Court Visit & Report Length: 2000 words Due Date: End of Week 9 (Sunday 19th May 11.59pm) Weighting: 30% Aim The aim of the court report is to get you out of the classroom and into the...

1 answer below »
Assessment 2 - Court Visit & Report
Length: 2000 words
Due Date: End of Week 9 (Sunday 19th May 11.59pm)
Weighting: 30%
Aim
The aim of the court report is to get you out of the classroom and into the courtroom to see how the law works in practice! We would like you to visit a court to observe proceedings for a couple of hours and then write a report on your visit.
Planning your court visit
It is important to have an understanding of the court system before you embark on your visit. Therefore, please complete the required reading for Week 1 and 2 before visiting a court.
Your best chance of seeing a court case from beginning to end will be in the Local Court or District Court. Please be aware that there is no certainty that the magistrate or judge will reach a decision while you are in court and we do not expect you to stay until a decision is reached. A couple of hours observing proceedings should be sufficient to gain enough understanding of the matter to write your Report.
If you find yourself in the middle of a lengthy trial, you may find it more interesting to visit another court. Also, if you find yourself in a list court where matters are quickly mentioned, it may be more useful to move to another court as you may not gather sufficient information to complete the required Report.
Although you may wish to visit court with other students, you must submit your own written work.
For locations of Local Courts, please refer to the following link:
http://www.localcourt.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/localcourts/court_locations.html
District Court: Sydney
Downing Centre XXXXXXXXXXLiverpool Street
(corner of Liverpool and Elizabeth Streets, above Museum Station)
The District Court also sits at 225 Macquarie Street and in Parramatta, Liverpool and Penrith.
Supreme Court
Law Courts Building, Queens Square (Phillip Street, near University of Sydney Law School). You may be interested in hearing Bail Applications in the Supreme Court (ask the front desk of the Supreme Court for directions)
Visiting the Court
There is no need to dress formally when you attend court, but you should dress neatly and you should remember that smoking, drinking and eating are not permitted in court. Nor is it permissible to take any type of electronic recording device into a courtroom.
When you arrive at the court you may wish to introduce yourself to a court officer. Explain that you are a student and that you have the task of observing and reporting on a court case. You should ask the Court Officer whether the taking of notes is permitted. The Court Officer may also be helpful in providing information concerning the case being heard.
As you enter and leave the courtroom while the court is in session, you should stop, face the bench and bow. When the magistrate or judge enters and leaves the courtroom, you should stand up. The magistrate or judge will then bow to those present in the courtroom. It is a mark of respect by those present to bow back.
The structure of your report
A) Background details
State precisely:
• name of the court visited
• date of the visit
• name of the case
• name of presiding judge or magistrate
• subject matter of the case, and whether it was a civil or criminal matter
• whether the parties were represented and by whom- private solicitors or barristers, the DPP or Legal Aid.
These facts can be stated in point form. These background details are necessary so that the reader of your report can build up an accurate picture of the setting about which you are reporting. Your reader will be able to understand the rest of your report better if they begin with a clear picture of the setting. Some details about the cases being heard will be posted on a notice board in the court foyer or, as stated previously, you can often find out such information from the Court Officer.
B) The court proceedings
This section is to be the body of the Report. We ask that you discuss your interpretation of the roles that participants were playing in the courtroom, the kinds of interactions between them, the evidence and the way in which it was presented. It is important to discuss the role of the judge or magistrate, lawyers and parties to the proceedings and any others worth commenting on in some detail. These details can include the extent the presiding officer played an active part, the degree of formality or informality in the proceedings, the degree of hostility or otherwise between the participants, some details of the evidence and the way in which evidence was presented.
If a final decision was reached in the case, then explain the outcome and any reasons given for the decision. As previously explained, not all cases will come to a conclusion in the time you have available to observe proceedings. In these cases, from what you have observed, what do you think will be the likely conclusion of the case? In discussing the outcome or likely outcome of the case, comment on whether you agree with the decision or what you think may be the decision. Give reasons why you agree or disagree.
Comment on the court process and how it was similar or different from your expectations. Does the court process you observed and the outcome of the case (if you were present when the case came to a conclusion) accord with your notions of “justice”? Explain your views.
Other questions you should answer are as follows:
• What was the most interesting part of your visit? Why?
• Is there anything about what you observed that would cause you to want to settle a case or to pursue it fully to trial? What and why?
• What was your overall impression of your Court visit and what did you learn from your visit?
C) The Law
Parties bringing cases to court argue that there has been a breach of the law. In the case you observed, name a statute or case that was relied on or relates to your case. Cite the case or statute and give brief details about how it relates to your case. If you were unable to pick up any mention of a case or statute when you were observing proceedings, state this and attempt to find a case or statue that you think is relevant to your case. Justify why you think the case or statue is relevant.
Answered Same Day Dec 22, 2021

Solution

David answered on Dec 22 2021
121 Votes
Court report
Student Name
Course/Number
Date
Instructor Name
1
A) Background details
Name of court visited
High Court Of Australia, Courtroom, Level 23
Law Courts Building, Queen’s Square, Sydney
Date of visit
Friday, 10 may 2013
Name of the case
Clark v Macourt [2013]
Name of presiding judge or magistrate
Kenneth Hayne, AC
Representation
Both sides were represented by private solicitors, being:
For David Macourt: MR D.F. JACKSON, QC from Norton Rose Australia.
For Anne Clark: MR C.M. HARRIS, SC from Redmond Hale Simpson.
Subject matter of the case
This case was a civil matter. A previous case had set a level of damages, and the
appellant was arguing that the level of this ruling was inappropriate (leave for appeal against
detail of lower court ruling). Specifically, the case was one where a number of vials of sperm
were sourced from an American company and proved to be defective in some manner, and
were thrown away. As a result, the purchaser sued and was awarded damages of the
eplacement sperm, listed at 2003 levels from a single existing quote. However, this is 8
2
times what the sperm could legally be sold for, and so the appellant claims that the value to
the claimant could at most have been a fraction of the total sought and awarded. This
particular case was for leave to appeal at a later date, based on particular required procedures.
The case has reached this stage of appeals because several important facets of it seem to rely
on differing interpretations of very basic legal terms, such as ‘goods’, and existed within a
gray regulatory environment at the time the actions occu
ed. It was complicated by the lack
of any records of the vials that were disposed of.
B) The court proceedings
This matter was clearly one that had gone on for some significant time, with both
parties being strongly vested in the outcome, and both capable of following legal procedures
to their utmost. This was clear from the fact that each side of the dispute was represented by
two or three lawyers from a private firm, rather than the defendant and appellant. The judge
seemed relatively relaxed, and both extremely well informed and confused in a very specific
technical sense - he knew exactly what he was confused about, and what needed to be
clarified in order for the overall case to move forwards, to the point that he highlighted
several parts of the previous judgement that had not been thoroughly explored previously and
made note of them. Although the lawyers were extremely professional, they were not in any
manner aggressive; rather, it seemed like all three parties simply wanted to get the matter
cleared away as soon as possible, since this was simply an appeal for more time before the
formal appeal process began.
As a result of being the parties in a long running dispute for which there is no clear
precedent, with even the judge not being particularly sure of what the facts and relevant lawas
of the case were, the interactions were professional, to the point, and extremely clipped. Each
side cited very specific parts of the previous judgement and court proceedings, and all three
parties clearly had a firm understanding of the technicalities of the material before them.
3
The evidence was presented in a very administrative manner. The appellant lawyer
first gave the specific references...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here