Criteria Poor Needs improvement Satisfactory Good Very good Excellent Discipline specific knowledge and skills (GLO1): topic selection; literature coverage; research methods, (4 marks). Topics is...

Criteria Poor
Needs
improvement
Satisfactory Good Very good Excellent
Discipline specific
knowledge and
skills (GLO1):
topic selection;
literature
coverage;
esearch methods,
(4 marks).
Topics is poorly if
at all, related to
cu
ent issues of
International
Finance.
The research lacks
information from
key sources
(Academic and
Professional
Journals and
periodicals as well
as valid databases).
(0-1.1 marks)
Topics is
somewhat related
to cu
ent issues of
International
Finance but the
esearch somewhat
lacks information
from key sources
(Academic and
Professional
Journals and
periodicals as well
as valid databases).
Research methods
have no relevance
to the topics
chosen.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
Topics is
sufficiently related
to cu
ent issues of
International
Finance.
The research uses
satisfactory
information from
key sources
(Academic and
Professional
Journals and
periodicals as well
as valid databases).
Used satisfactory
esearch methods
elevant to the
topics chosen.
(2-2.3 marks)
Topics is nicely
elated to cu
ent
issues of
International
Finance.
The research uses
good quality
information from
key (Academic and
Professional
Journals and
periodicals as well
as valid databases).
Used good
esearch methods
for the topics
chosen.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
Topics is
interesting and
very much related
to cu
ent issues of
International
Finance.
The research uses
very good quality
information from
key sources
(Academic and
Professional
Journals and
periodicals as well
as valid databases).
Used very good
esearch methods
elevant to the
topics chosen.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
Topic is very
interesting and
elated to the most
cu
ent issues of
International
Finance.
The research uses
very high quality
information from
key sources
(Academic and
Professional
Journals and
periodicals as well
as valid databases).
Used advanced
esearch methods
elevant to the
topics chosen.
(3.2-4 marks)
Communication
(GLO2): Report
structure and
presentation, (4
marks).
Report lacked key
elements and was
poorly presented.
Writing did not
flow at all and the
template was not
used.
Referencing was
not in accordance
with the reference
style provided.
Basic English was
used with many
spelling and
grammatical e
ors
present.
(0-1.1 marks)
Report lacked
some elements and
was not
adequately
presented.
Writing often did
not flow clearly.
Referencing was
not entirely in
accordance with
the reference style
provided.
Basic English was
used with quite a
few spelling and
grammatical e
ors
present.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
Report included
most elements and
was adequately
presented.
Writing at times
did not flow
clearly.
Referencing was
somewhat in
accordance with
the reference style
provided.
Basic English was
used with some
spelling and
grammatical e
ors
present.
(2-2.3 marks)
Report included all
elements and was
presented
appropriately.
Writing mostly
flowed well and
sections were
linked.
Template was
effectively used.
Referencing was in
accordance with
the reference style
provided.
English was used
effectively with
few spelling and
grammatical e
ors
present.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
Report included all
elements and was
well presented.
Writing flowed
clearly and
sections were
linked effectively.
Referencing was
very consistent
oth in text and
within Reference
list.
English was used
effectively with
very few spelling
and grammatical
e
ors present.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
Comprehensive
and succinct
eporting of all
elements noted in
the Assignment
Template.
Writing flowed
clearly and
sections were
linked very
effectively.
Referencing was
exemplary.
English was used
very effectively
and was e
or-free.
(3.2-4 marks)
Communication
(GLO2): Using
oral and
interpersonal
communication to
inform, motivate
and effect change.
Time limit: 5
minutes, (10
marks).
Failed to
demonstrate orally
the significance
and the
contribution of the
esearch conducted
to the field of
International
Finance.
Delivery
techniques
(posture, gesture,
eye contact, visual
aids and vocal
expressiveness)
make oral
presentation
Hardly
demonstrates the
significance and
the contribution of
the research
conducted to the
field of
International
Finance orally.
Delivery
techniques
(posture, gesture,
eye contact, visual
aids and vocal
expressiveness)
make oral
presentation
Satisfactorily
demonstrate he
significance and
the contribution of
the research
conducted to the
field of
International
Finance orally.
Delivery
techniques
(posture, gesture,
eye contact, visual
aids and vocal
expressiveness)
make oral
presentation
mostly interesting,
Provided good
demonstration of
the significance
and the
contribution of the
esearch conducted
to the field of
International
Finance orally.
Delivery
techniques
(posture, gesture,
eye contact, visual
aids and vocal
expressiveness)
make oral
presentation
always interesting,
Provided very
good
demonstration of
the significance
and the
contribution of the
esearch conducted
to the field of
International
Finance orally.
Delivery
techniques
(posture, gesture,
eye contact, visual
aids and vocal
expressiveness)
make oral
presentation
credible,
Provided excellent
demonstration of
the significance
and the
contribution of the
esearch conducted
to the field of
International
Finance orally.
Delivery
techniques
(posture, gesture,
eye contact, visual
aids and vocal
expressiveness)
make oral
presentation
credible, eloquent,
compelling,
always difficult to
follow.
(0-2.9 marks)
generally difficult
to follow.
(3-4.9 marks)
engaging and
credible.
(5-5.9 marks)
engaging and
credible.
(6-6.9 marks)
compelling and
engaging.
(7-7.9 marks)
polished and
engaging.
(8-10 marks)
Problem Solving
(GLO5):
Demonstrates
ability to
independently
construct a clear,
succinct and
insightful
statement about a
complex problem
with evidence of
contextual factors
in writing, (8
marks).
Failed to
demonstrate
analysis of the
problems/issues
and/or lack
interpretation of
esults from the
analysis.
Also failed to link
the research
findings with the
existing literature.
Data/figures are
exactly copied (not
eproduced) from
the internet sources
without providing
any references.
(0-2.3 marks)
Included a
ief
analysis of the
problems/issues
ut lacking
interpretation of
esults from the
analysis.
Also failed to link
the research
findings with the
existing literature.
Data/figures are
exactly copied (not
eproduced) from
the internet sources
without providing
any references.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
Included a
satisfactory
analysis of the
problems/issues
and interpreted
esults from the
analysis.
Research is
somewhat linked to
existing literature.
Some data and
figures are exactly
copied from the
internet sources
without providing
any references.
(4-4.7 marks)
Included some
good analysis of
the problems/issues
and adequately
interpreted results
from the analysis.
Also succeeded to
link the research
findings with the
existing literature.
Data and figures
are created from
different sources
with many
eferences
completed
co
ectly.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
Included very
good analysis of
the problems/issues
and adequately
interpreted results
from the analysis.
Also succeeded to
link the research
findings well with
the existing
literature.
Data and figures
are created from
different sources
with most
eferences
completed
co
ectly.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
Included an
excellent analysis
of the
problems/issues
and excellently
interpreted results
from the analysis.
Also succeeded to
consistently link
the research
findings very well
with the existing
literature.
Data and figures
are created
professionally by
applying relevant
analytical tools to
the data and
information from
different sources.
Sources for data
consistently
eferenced
co
ectly.
(6.4-8 marks)
Global citizenship
(GLO8):
Relevance of the
study to finance
profession and
wider community,
(4 marks).
The ethical, social
or economic
significance of the
esearch findings
have no relevance
to the Finance
profession or wider
community.
(0-1.1 marks)
The ethical, social
or economic
significance of the
esearch findings
are reported
without indicating
any relevance to
the Finance
profession or wider
community.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
The ethical, social
or economic
significance of the
esearch findings
have satisfactory
level of relevance
to the Finance
profession or wider
community.
(2-2.3 marks)
The ethical, social
or economic
significance of the
esearch findings
have good
elevance to the
Finance profession
or wider
community
including investors
and academics.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
The ethical, social
or economic
significance of the
esearch findings
are very largely
elevant to the
Finance profession
or wider
community
including investors
and academics.
XXXXXXXXXXmarks)
The ethical, social
or economic
significance of the
esearch findings
are highly
elevant and
valuable to the
Finance profession
or wider
community
including investors
and academics.
(3.2-4 marks)
Overall Score N N P C D HD