Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

About Dracca: Dracca, Inc. (“Dracca”) is a publicly-traded U.S. corporation that manufactures and distributes baby equipment in seven countries. It is based in St. Louis, MO, but has manufacturing...

1 answer below »
About Dracca:
Dracca, Inc. (“Dracca”) is a publicly-traded U.S. corporation that manufactures and distributes baby equipment in seven countries. It is based in St. Louis, MO, but has manufacturing facilities in Philadelphia, Sacramento, and Indonesia. Key products include:
  • Strollers
  • High Chairs
  • Cribs
  • Pack-n-Play Playpens
  • Toys
  • Baby/toddler feeding equipment (bottles, cups, utensils)
Dracca employs nine hundred employees and has projected earnings of $50 million U.S. dollars for the coming year.
Scenario
Dracca uses a standard-form contract to sell directly to consumers in the United States. About one-third of direct sales occur in Spanish-speaking communities within the United States. The contract is in English and is 16 pages in length. A binding arbitration clause on page 5 requires all disputes arising from the contract to be settled by arbitration.
Recently, two consumers from the Spanish-speaking community sued Dracca in state court. The state court dismissed the claims pursuant to the arbitration clause. The consumers then brought a claim challenging the validity of the arbitration clause, claiming they were not properly informed that they were waiving a right to trial when entering the contract.
Over the past three years, Dracca has had 23 additional claims brought to the arbitration process because of this form contract. Twenty of the 23 claims were arbitrated by the same dispute resolution agency, as selected by Dracca.
Recently, a new dispute arose regarding product safety of the Dracca Pack-n-Play Beach Model. Because retailers made the claims, they were not subject to the binding arbitration clause contained in consumer contracts. The court claim involved faulty clasps that did not lock the pack-n-play in place As a result of the faulty clasps, four infants in three countries suffered life-threatening injuries. One of those infants was from the U.S. and had to be placed on life support for two weeks before recovering from a respiratory injury sustained after being trapped in the pack-n-play for nearly a half hour.
During the discovery process, Dracca sent 600 boxes of documents to the attorneys for the retailer in an attempt to hide relevant information. Within the boxes were several documents properly labeled in response to the attorneys’ request for production. After combing through the documents and conducting other discovery, parties surmised that an employee of Dracca, Sue Hennings, tampered with the faulty clasps. Hennings worked in accounting, but she was overlooked for a promotion to oversee the new pack-n-play line. Hennings deliberately tampered with the safety of the clasps in retaliation, an action that could carry criminal charges.
Instructions: In light of these facts, please respond to the following questions using course material and credible outside research to support your findings. Please submit findings in a three- page paper using APA format (introduction, conclusion, references, citations).
Course book: Bagley, C. (2012). Managers and the Legal Environment: Strategies for the 21st Century (7th ed). Cengage Learning.
  • What is the legal effect of the arbitration clause on consumers? Must consumers abide by the decision of the arbitrator? Use caselaw to support your position.
  • Will the two Spanish-speaking consumers prevail in invalidating the arbitration clause? Why or why not? Discuss the legal considerations the court will entertain in reaching its decision.
  • Identify the ethical concerns regarding the implementation of the arbitration clause and the arbitration process. Recommend actions Dracca could take to remedy these ethical concerns. (The Ethical Business Leader’s Decision Tree in chapter 2 of the text may be a useful tool for your analysis).
  • Identify the ethical concerns regarding Dracca’s approach to the litigation process. Recommend actions Dracca could take to remedy these ethical concerns. (The Ethical Business Leader’s Decision Tree in chapter 2 of the text may be a useful tool for your analysis).
  • Is Dracca responsible for the actions of Hennings? Why or why not? Use legal principles discussed in the readings to support your conclusion.
  • What actions (internal and external) do you recommend to Dracca to resolve the dispute regarding the Pack-n-Play clasps? Be specific and detailed, and be sure to base recommendations on relevant legal and ethical principles.
Substantively responded to each legal and ethical scenario presented, exhibiting analysis of issues in light of course topics.
In addition to information found in the textbook, supported research and findings with at least two scholarly sources, which may include cases, laws, articles and similar materials.
Crafted in-depth internal and external recommendations for Dracca to remedy legal and ethical situations presented.
Answered Same Day Dec 23, 2021

Solution

David answered on Dec 23 2021
124 Votes
A
itration Clause
Running Head: ARBITRATION CLAUSE
A
itration Clause
Legal & Ethical Aspects
abc
8/8/2013
ARBITRATION CLAUSE
Abstract
This paper deals with the legal and ethical aspects of the binding a
itration clause. The main
focus lies on the clause from the consumer’s point of view. Dracca Inc. has been taken as an
example for understanding how this clause works and how people view it.
The paper begins with an understanding of what and how Dracca has used its a
itration clause.
Further it explains the clause and, shows how it affects the consumer legally. The paper moves
on to understand the ethical considerations to maintain the stakeholders. Finally, the paper
concludes with an understanding of how Dracca should control the situation in hand.
ARBITRATION CLAUSE
Introduction
Dracca Inc., a publicly traded company is being targeted by consumers for its binding a
itration
clause that does not see the involvement or best interests of the consumers. The company is
ound by the U.S. State laws which consider a
itration legal. In this present case, Dracca has
een held responsible for the negligence in its latest product Pack-n-Play which has caused
severe injuries in the kids who used it.
The A
itration Clause & its Effects
Most companies prefer to use the binding a
itration as a clause in their contract. In case, of a
inding a
itration clause, the a
itration and everything related to the clause favors the company
in consideration. As per this clause, the disputes that occur between the company and the
consumer would have to be effectively solved with the help of an a
itrator. The a
itrator would
e chosen by the company (Roger, 2009). The company sets rules for a
itration in a way that
would favor the company’s best interest. The a
itrator also seeks personal interest for being
hired by the company for a long while hence; he would look at the company’s best interests
(Bagley, 2012)
This is an issue for the consumers. In a binding contract, the...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here