ABC was formed in 1996 and hired employees that year. At a meeting in 1997, they expressed concern...

Question

ABC was formed in 1996 and hired employees that year. At a meeting in 1997, they expressed concern to an executive that the company was not likely to survive as they used outdated equipment and worked long hours. The executive told the employees that they should stay with the company because it was likely the firm would merge with another company and, if it did, the original eight employees would be rewarded with five percent of the value of the sale or merger of ABC. In 2001, ABC was bought by another company. Seven of the eight original employees were still with the firm and requested their five percent of the sale price. The company refused to pay, contending that the employees were at-will and there was no enforceable contract, the alleged agreement was illusory and, in any case, it violated the statute of frauds because it took more than one year to come into effect. The employees sued for breach of contract.
You be the judge. Who wins? Why? Make sure you address all the issues.

David · Accepted Answer

Unilateral Contract
Running Head: UNILATERAL CONTRACT
1
PAGE  
2
UNILATERAL CONTRACT
Unilateral Contract
The employees win because the company breached the unilateral contract that they promised. A unilateral contract is a contract where the offeror promises benefits or payments and in turn, the offeree performs the expected actions. In this case, ABC Company binds itself in a unilateral contract while employees remain at work as expected. The unilateral contract does not necessarily require the offeree to liaise with the offeror or accept to perform the actions expected.

ABC was formed in 1996 and hired employees that year. At a meeting in 1997, they expressed concern to an executive that the company was not likely to survive as they used outdated equipment and worked...

Solution

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment