Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

(a) Carol Cameron was an actress who was best known for playing dramatic roles. She had appeared in several successful movie dramas. In 2000 she was nominated for a Best Supporting Actress OscarĀ®. On...

1 answer below Ā»
(a) Carol Cameron was an actress who was best known for playing dramatic roles. She had appeared in several successful movie dramas. In 2000 she was nominated for a Best Supporting Actress OscarĀ®. On 1 January 2001 she signed a contract with Colossus Studios to play one of the leads in Days of Passion, a film which was to be based on an award-winning literary novel. The movie was to be directed by a director who had won an Oscar for another film based on such a novel. The film was scheduled to be made in London and other English locations during the period between 15 May and 25 September 2002. The contract provided that Cameron would be paid a salary of $5 million. On 10 February 2002 Colossus informed Cameron that they had decided to cancel the Days of Passion project. Colossus informed Cameron that they were offering her the ā€œleading female roleā€ in a new R-rated action movie starring Sylvester Stallone and Vin Diesel to be made during the period between May and September 2002 on Colossus Studios soundstages and on outdoor locations in southern California. Colossus offered Cameron a salary of $5 million to appear in this action movie. Cameron declined to appear in the action movie. Cameron filed suit against Colossus for breach of contract. Will this suit be successful? If so, what amount of damages will the court award to Cameron? Explain.

(b) In August 2004 Mariana Martinez, an actress who played one of the lead roles in The Force (a hit TV series produced by Colossus and broadcast on the XYZ Network) announced that she was leaving Hollywood and that she would no longer work on episodes of the TV series for the 2004 season. (Martinez was under contract with Colossus to appear in the series during the XXXXXXXXXXand XXXXXXXXXXseasons. The contract was in writing.). Colossus filed suit against Martinez for breach of contract, asking the court to issue a decree of specific performance. Will the court grant this remedy to Colossus? If not, what remedies might the court grant? Explain.

(c) Martin Mogul, the CEO of Colossus Studios, entered into a contract with Bozo Construction Co. providing that Bozo would build a guest house on part of a large property that Mogul owned in Bel-Air. The contract provided that Mogul would pay $30,000 to Bozo before construction began. An additional payment of $30,000 would be paid when the project was half-completed. A final payment of $40,000 was required to be paid 2 weeks after the construction project was completed. Bozo was required to build the house in accordance with plans provided by Mogul. Mogul made the down payment and Bozo began construction. When the project was half-completed Mogul paid another $30,000 to Bozo. The plans required Bozo to install in the guesthouse kitchen a specified model of dishwasher manufactured by Maytag. In fact Bozo installed a similar model of dishwasher manufactured by General Electric. The contract required that all of the interior walls be painted with specified shades of paint manufactured by Sherwin-Williams Paint Co.; Bozo used instead similar shades of paint manufactured by Vista Paint Co. Bozo finished the construction of the guest house. Mogul, claiming that the terms of the contract had not been complied with, refused to make the final payment of $40,000 to Bozo. Is Mogul obligated to make this final payment to Bozo? Explain.

(d) Mogul arranged with Penelope Yang, a contemporary artist, to paint a portrait of Mogul. The written contract provided that the artist would be paid a fee of $500,000. The contract also said: ā€œthe artist (Yang) hereby agrees that Mogul’s personal satisfaction with the portrait painted by the artist is guaranteedā€. When the portrait was completed Mogul said ā€œI hate that picture – it makes me look like Rodney Dangerfieldā€. (Mogul liked to imagine that he looked like Brad Pitt.) A reproduction of the portrait appeared in a magazine. Many distinguished artists and museum directors saw it and said that the painting was ā€œmagnificentā€ and ā€œa wonderful work of artā€. Suzy Starlet (Mogul’s wife) said to Mogul: ā€œThat is a wonderful picture – it captures the real you – if you divorce me I want to get that painting as part of my property settlementā€. Mogul refused to pay Yang the fee agreed upon in the contract. Yang filed suit for breach of contract. What will the result of this suit be? Explain.
Answered Same Day Dec 21, 2021

Solution

Robert answered on Dec 21 2021
122 Votes
Breach of Contract
Running Head: BREACH OF CONTRACT
1
PAGE
6
BREACH OF CONTRACT
Breach of Contract
Name
Institution
Breach of Contract
Cameron’s Suit against Colossus
Failing to perform any term specified in a contract, oral or written, without a legal excuse, is a
each of contract. In that case, any person who terminates a contract without following the right procedures is liable for damages (Edgar, 2008, p. 45). When one enters into a contract with another party, they do so with an expectation that both parties will live up to the contract. However, a
each of contract occurs in case one of the parties fails to perform as agreed.
In this case, Carol Cameron entered into a contract with Colossus Studios to play in the ā€˜Days of Passion’ only for the project to be later cancelled. Therefore, Colossus Studios was guilty of
eaching a contract, thus, ought to pay for damages caused. In order for the suit to be successful, Cameron will have to prove beyond reasonable doubt that a
each occu
ed. In order to establish a link between claimant’s loss and
each, legal and factual causation ought to be shown. Factual causation requires a plaintiff to show that, were it not for a
each of contract, he or she would not have suffered the loss. Additionally, legal causation requires a
each of contract to be a direct cause of the loss incu
ed. Additionally, to prove a case of
each, a claimant must show clearly the damages caused, and contract formation (Edgar, 2008, p. 45). For instance, in the case of Williams vs. Gold circle, the judge held out that Gold circle films were guilty of
eaching a contract because of terminating William’s contract. In that case, the judge ordered Gold Circle to pay $ 6 million (Finn & Baker, 2010).
Therefore, Cameron must prove to the court that the
each caused damages, due to expectations that she had on acting in that particular film. Additionally, though the director gave her an opportunity to play a role in another project, still, Colossus
eached the contract, as the contract was specifically for ā€˜the days of passion’ and not any other film. Therefore, if Cameron proves that indeed Colossus was guilty of
eaching their contract, the court may award her with expectation or nominal damages. Nominal damages are awarded by a court in case of a legal wrong, when there is no actual financial loss as in this scenario (Meiners, Ringleb & Edwards, 2011, p. 70). On the other hand, she can be awarded with expectation damages for loss of what she was anticipating from playing in the film ā€˜Days of Passion’. Additionally, the court can award her for damages incu
ed, as far as time wasted, for instance, preparing and rehearsing in vain.
References
Edgar, T. (2008). The Pearson Guide to the Llb Entrance Examinations. India: Pearson Education India. Retrieved from ooks.google.co.ke
ooks?id=0lcj-iREzvcC&dq=penalties+for+
each+of+contract+by+a+director+to+a+film+actor&source=gbs_navlinks_s
Finn, N. & Baker, K. (2010). Rob William’s Cop out Case Closed. Retrieved from fr.eonline.com/news/64538
obin-williams-cop-out-case-closed
Meiners, R., Ringleb, A & Edwards, F. (2011). The Legal Environment of Business. Kentucky:...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions Ā»

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here