1. Suppose that, instead of a spring gun, the Brineys had unleashed on the premises a vicious...

Question

1. Suppose that, instead of a spring gun, the Brineys had unleashed on the premises a vicious watchdog that severely injured Katko’s leg? Would the result have been different? What if the watchdog had been properly chained?
2. When may one set a spring gun and not be subject to liability? What can one legally do to protect property or life?
3. What do you think the consequences would have been if the dissenting judge’s suggestions had become law?
4. A case involving breaking and entering and shooting a gun might appear to be a criminal matter. What factors make this a civil lawsuit?

Moore, Chief Justice
The primary issue presented here is whether an owner may protect personal property in an unoccupied boarded-up farmhouse against trespassers and thieves by a spring gun capable of inflicting death or serious injury.
We are not here concerned with a man’s right to protect his home and members of his family. Defendants’ home was several miles from the scene of the incident to which we refer infra.

David · Accepted Answer

Suppose that, instead of a spring gun, the Brineys had unleashed on the premises a vicious watchdog 
that severely injured Katko’s leg? Would the result have been different? What if the watchdog had been 
properly chained? 
 This inquiry is intended to represent how the lawful procedure makes utilization of closely 
resembling circumstances. Prosser and Keeton, Law of Torts (fifth ed., 1984, § 21), proposes that a 
horrible pooch would be grouped with a spring weapon and that the proprietor would be at risk if the 
puppy were left on the loose.

1. Suppose that, instead of a spring gun, the Brineys had unleashed on the premises a vicious watchdog that severely injured Katko’s leg? Would the result have been different? What if the watchdog had...

Solution

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment