Comprehensive Change Management Process (130 points)
The final project for this course requires students to create a comprehensive Change Management
Process, including its origination and implementation. To complete this project, address the
following:
ï‚· Choose a Middle Eastern organization in which you are cu
ently working or with which
you are familiar. Provide a
ief description of the organization, including its history,
number of employees, products/services, mission/vision, strategies, etc.
ï‚· Discuss the problem or issue confronting the organization. Why is there a need to change
(e.g., falling profits, low morale, challenges recruiting talented employees, etc.)?
 Assess the principle reasons for the organization’s problem or issue. What is the root cause
and what are other causes of the problem/issue?
ï‚· Identify the intended change you propose for the organization. Detail the reasons for the
change, including any research you conducted that led you to this recommendation (for
instance, similar organizations in a similar situation followed this strategy, or studies
indicated this was the prefe
ed solution for other organizations in a similar situation).
ï‚· Identify a plan to implement the change. Be clear about the steps or processes that you
propose to implement this change, including any resources which may be needed
throughout the process.
ï‚· Identify the measurement/control mechanisms you would utilize to determine if the change
management process is working effectively. Also include any contingency plans you would
propose if/when the plan is not implemented as intended.
ï‚· Finally, offer a
ief statement about what you learned from completing this project and
how your research in this course has affected your perspective/perception of change.
Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:
 Be 8 pages in length, which does not include the title page, abstract or required reference
page, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements.
 Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines.
 Support your submission with course material concepts, principles and theories from the
textbook and at least four scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.
 Review the grading ru
ic to see how you will be graded for this assignment.
SEU_MGT521
Critical Thinking Writing Ru
ic - Module 14
Exceeds
Expectation
Meets Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence
Content, Research, and Analysis
25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points
Requirements Includes all of the
equired
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
Includes most of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
Includes some of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
Includes few of the
equired
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
29-35 Points 22-28 Points 15-21 Points 8-14 Points
Content Demonstrates
substantial and
extensive
knowledge of the
materials, with no
e
ors or major
omissions.
Demonstrates
adequate
knowledge of the
materials; may
include some
minor e
ors or
omissions.
Demonstrates fair
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes some
major e
ors or
omissions.
Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes many
major e
ors or
omissions.
37-45 Points 28-36 Points 19-27 Points 10-18 Points
Analysis Provides strong
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Provides adequate
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Provides poor
though, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Provides little or no
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points
Sources Sources meet
equired criteria
and include four or
more scholarly,
peer-reviewed
journal articles
chosen to provide
effective
substance and
perspectives on
the issue under
examination.
Sources meet
equired criteria
and include three
scholarly, peer-
eviewed journal
articles chosen to
provide effective
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
Sources meet
equired criteria
and include two
scholarly, peer-
eviewed journal
articles chosen to
provide effective
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
Source selection
and integration of
knowledge from
the course is
clearly deficient.
Sources do not
meet required
criteria and
includes only one
scholarly, peer-
eviewed journal
article chosen to
provide effective
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
SEU_MGT521
Critical Thinking Writing Ru
ic - Module 14
Mechanics and Writing
5 Points 4 Points 3 Points 1-2 Points
Demonstrates
college-level
proficiency in
organization,
grammar and
style.
Project is clearly
organized, well
written, and in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.
Strong sentence
and paragraph
structure, contains
no e
ors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
eferences.
Project is fairly well
organized and
written and is in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.
Reasonably good
sentence and
paragraph
structure, may
include a few
minor e
ors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
eferences.
Project is poorly
organized and
written and may
not follow proper
format as outlined
in the assignment.
Inconsistent to
inadequate
sentence and
paragraph
development,
and/or includes
numerous or major
e
ors in grammar,
spelling, APA style
or APA citations
and references.
Project is not
organized or well
written and is not
in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Poor
quality work;
unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
spelling, APA style,
and APA citations
and references.
Total points possible = 130
Comprehensive Change Management Process
SEU_MGT521_CTWritingRu
ic_Mod14