The objective of this week’s topic is to make sure you have an appreciation of the fundamentals of the philosophical basis and methods of negotiation.
Try to ask yourself the questions that were in the slides in this week’s lecture:
1. Does the ‘Theory’ outlined in the Alfredson T., & Cungu A.,2008 paper match the concept of negotiation in this unit?
2. In the more serious YouTube videos do you find that they support or contradict the concept of “commercial negotiation” as outlined in the first two weeks of the unit?
3. Is the “Art of Negotiation” applicable to the Chunnel Project?
In Alfredson T., & Cungu A.2008.NegotiationTheory and Practice paper they raise a number of points, in reflection:
4. Is negotiation really part of policy making? In what way is it so?
5. Is negotiating something that is related to a tangible outcome, such as the Chunnel, the same as negotiating something that is intangible, such as the end of a war?
Kerzner XXXXXXXXXXSection 25.5Managing Troubled Projects also raises interesting points. So how many of the can be used as trigger points that negotiation should be employed to avoid a troubled project:
1. What bullet point in this section apply to negotiation?
2. Are there any similarities between Alfredson T., & Cungu A.2008 paper and this section?
Could Kerzner’s Recovery Life-Cycle Phases be applied in the Theory outlined in Alfredson & Cungu?
Making an overall reflection of PPMP20011:
1. Does Commercial Negotiation require soft skills, and interpersonal skills or is it about contracts and procedures without any emotion being involved?
2. What are the drivers that motivate the parties involved in a negotiation process?