Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Executive Summary: What valuation do the assumptions on the bottom of page 1 and top of page 2 suggest? Use the VC Method, without taking into account the additional investment in year 2. The...

1 answer below »

Executive Summary:
What valuation do the assumptions on the bottom of page 1 and top of page 2 suggest? Use the VC Method, without taking into account the additional investment in year 2.
The valuation assumptions suggest the following:
· Vulture ventures is offering the $4 million for $1/share that would mean they are getting 4 million shares for $1.
· The $1/share valuation suggest that Vulture Ventures is valuing the cu
ent owner’s 5 million shares and the common stock (future employee shares) of 1.5 million shares at $1/share which would equate to $6.5M prefunding valuation ($1/share X 5M shares +$1/share X 1.5M shares) as shown on Exhibit 1
· With the $4M additional Series A funding from Vulture partners, the total valuation after funding according to Vulture partners will be $10.5M postfunding valuation as shown on Exhibit 2. ($6.5M for SpiffyTerm’s portion + $4M for Venture partner’s portion for $1/share) That would be 48% stake for the owners, 14% stake for the common stock owners which are the future employees and 38% stake for Vulture ventures
· Spiffyterm’s IPO valuation of $80 million by year 4 with a 45% discount rate assumes a present value valuation of $18.1M as shown on Exhibit 3 which is $7.6M higher valuation than what Vulture Ventures is valuing the company
· Since Vulture Venture’s PV valuation is $10.5M post funding vs. the $18.1M for Spiffyterm’s valuation, that would assume either they utilized a higher discount rate or a lower valuation at year 4 of the IPO than Spiffyterm. As Exhibit 4 shows, for Vulture Ventures to value the company $10.5M, if they assumed the same valuation of $80 million as Spiffyterm they then used 66% discount rate (solved by goal seek) , which is much higher than the 45% Spiffyterm is assuming.
· As Exhibit 5 shows, if Vulture Ventures used the same discount rate of 45% as Spiffyterm for the $80M year 4 valuation, then they would have to have assumed, that year 4 valuation would have been $46.5million instead of the $80million Spiffyterm is assuming ($33.6M lower year 4 valuation than Spiffyterm)
The founders also wanted to do some sensitivity analysis with their assumptions. What would the valuation be if they used a discount rate of 25% instead of 45%?
As shown below in figure 2, a 25% discount rate would mean the PV valuation of $32.7 million for Spiffyterm with $80M valuation in year 4 which is $14.7M higher than the $18.1M valuation at 45% discount trate
Based on the term sheet in Exhibit 1, what is the total dollar amount of the liquidity preference they would receive at exit in addition to any gains on the value of their stock?
Figure 2 shows the total dollar amount that Vulture Ventures would receive for liquidity preference. They will receive first the original investment for the Series A funding of $4M (1x liquidation preference), plus the accrued dividends which is stated as $0.08 per share of the prefe
ed in this case it assumes 1 year of accrued dividends plus the participating preference amount at the time the liquidation which depends on the valuation at the time of liquidation could range from $4M-$19M. If the valuation is based on the $10.5M post funding amount based on Vulture Ventures then that amount will be 38%(Vulture venture stake) of $10.5M valuation which equates to ~4$M. If the valuation is the capped amount $50M then it will be $19M. This indicates that the total dollar amount of liquidity preference received would be anywhere between $8.3M-$23.3M. Beyond the $50M valuation, the liquidity preference would convert to the same as common stock.
Conclusion:
Exhibit 4
Post funding
Valuation Year 4$80,000,000
Discount Rate66%
Term4 years
PV Valuation10,500,000$
Vulture Ventures
Valuation
Exhibit 5Post funding
Cu
ent Valuation$10,500,000
PV Valuation
Discount rate gross up
(1+0.45)^4
4.42
Valuation at Year 4$46,415,316
difference from Spiffyterm
valution in year 4($33,584,684)
Assuming 45%
discount rate
Vulture Ventures
Figure 1
Valuation Year 4$80,000,000$80,000,000
Discount Rate45%25%
Term4 years 4 years
PV Valuation18,097,475$ XXXXXXXXXX,768,000$
Spiffyterm, Inc Valuation
Sensitivity Analysis
Figure 2
Shares
$/share
Liquidation
total
Prefe
ed Series A funding4,000,000$1$4,000,000
Accrued Dividends (1 yr)4,000,000$0.08$320,000
ValuationStake
$10,500,00038%$3,990,000
$50,000,00038%$19,000,000
$8,310,000
$23,320,000
Participating Prefe
ence
(upto $50M valuation)
Total
Range
Liquidation Prefe
ence
Exhibit 1OwnersCommon StockTotal
Shares5,000, XXXXXXXXXX,500, XXXXXXXXXX,500,000
Valuation
$1/share
$5,000,000$1,500,000$6,500,000
Vulture Ventures - Pre-funding Valuation
Exhibit 2
Owners
Employee
Common Stock
Shares5,000, XXXXXXXXXX,500, XXXXXXXXXX,000, XXXXXXXXXX10,500,000
Valuation
$1/share
$5,000,000$1,500,000$4,000,000$10,500,000
% stake48%14%38%
Vulture Ventures Postfunding Valuation
SpiffyTerm
Vulture VenturesTotal
Exhibit 3
Spiffyterm, Inc
Valuation
Valuation Year 4$80,000,000
Discount Rate45%
Term4 years
PV Valuation18,097,475$
Answered Same Day Sep 20, 2022

Solution

Rochak answered on Sep 20 2022
60 Votes
Executive Summary:
Vulture ventures are the one which was offering a great deal to the founders of SpiffyTerm Inc., this will make sure that the valuation of the company skyrocket before funding and after the funding round. But this valuation of vulture ventures did
ing ring some bells to the founder when they calculated that the IPO valuation for the firm which they were valued at $80 million will mean that the cu
ent valuation should be approximately $18.1 million but that was not the case with the company as vulture ventures were only quoting a valuation of $10.1 million for funding which was less than the calculation of the founder. Above all the founders' knowledge about the firm made them do a couple of sensitivity analyses which can be seen below in the report and in all the scenarios the valuation offered was vulture ventures was way too low than the firm could be valued at in the worst case scenario. Because of the unfair valuation offered by vulture ventures, the founder did try the calculation to back the valuation that they were demanding. Also, because of the risks the venture possessed made the founders use a. higher discount rate than usual, i.e., at 45%.
What valuation do the assumptions on the bottom of page 1 and top of page 2 suggest? Use the VC Method, without taking into account the additional investment in year 2.
The valuation assumptions suggest the following:
· Vulture ventures are offering $4 million for $1/share which would mean they are getting 4 million shares for $1.
· The $1/share valuation suggests that Vulture Ventures is valuing the cu
ent owner’s 5 million shares and the common stock (future employee shares) of 1.5 million shares at $1/share which would equate to a $6.5M prefunding valuation ($1/share X 5M shares +$1/share X 1.5M shares) as shown on Exhibit 1
· With the $4M additional Series A funding from Vulture partners, the total valuation after funding according to Vulture partners will be $10.5M post-funding valuation as shown in Exhibit 2. ($6.5M for SpiffyTerm’s portion + $4M for Venture partner’s portion for $1/share) That would be 48% stake for the owners, 14% stake for the common stock owners which are the future employees and 38% stake for Vulture...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here