"Search and Seizures" Please respond to the following:Go to the Illinois State Bar Association...

Question

"Search and Seizures" Please respond to the following:Go to the Illinois State Bar Association Website and read the article titled, “U.S. Supreme Court Says ‘No’ to Cell-Phone Searches Incident to Arrest” located at http://www.isba.org/ibj/2014/09/ussupremecourtsays%E2%80%98no%E2%80%99cell-phonesea. Examine the court’s decision as it relates to cell phone searches incident to arrest. Based on all available information, agree or disagree with the court’s decision. Provide a rationale for your response.Compare and contrast vehicle searches and inventories and indicate the most important differences between the two (2) as they relate to law enforcement officers. In your own opinion, do you feel that law enforcement officers should be allowed to conduct vehicle inventories without warrants issued by judges? Provide a rationale for your response.

David · Accepted Answer

The decision of Supreme court in both cases Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie seem 
highly justified. There is involvement of intrusion of privacy in checking the data of mobile 
phones. The court does not bar the search but only requires the warrant before making the search. 
The intent of the honorable court in this decision is very clear. The police administration should 
not do the mischief by intruding the privacy of any individual who is suspected to have 
committed a crime.

"Search and Seizures" Please respond to the following: Go to the Illinois State Bar Association Website and read the article titled, “U.S. Supreme Court Says ‘No’ to Cell-Phone Searches Incident to...

Solution

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment