Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

PRE-REQUISITE: -Your paper MUST be written usingChicago-Turabian Format and citation style. - PAPERS WITH CITATION-FORMATTING ISSUES WILL BE GRADES AS "0" WITH NO OPPORTUNITY FOR A REWRITE. -Write a...

1 answer below »

PRE-REQUISITE:

-Your paper MUST be written usingChicago-Turabian Format and citation style.

-PAPERS WITH CITATION-FORMATTING ISSUES WILL BE GRADES AS "0" WITH NO OPPORTUNITY FOR A REWRITE.

-Write a research essay (at least 1500 words and at least 5ACADEMIC(3 sources are already provided) about one of the issue of Pro-Life vs Pro-Choice.

-You are free to choose the scope and angle of your paper, the only requirement is that ALL 3 SOURCES PROVIDED MUST BE USED. My suggestion is to first read these articles and see what you are inspired to write.

-You MUST choose one of the two positions and defend it using a Logical Argument that is Valid and contains no informal fallacies.

-It is very important that you not let emotions take the better of you, you are writing a logical argument in the form of an essay.

These are 3 sources you must use and you can find two more. The issue of PERSONHOOD is key:

1.Michael Tooley, Abortion and infanticide

Actions

2.On the moral and legal status of abortion

Actions

3.The beginning of personhood a Thomistic bilogical analysis.pdf

Actions

For this assignment you must follow the following format:

I.Thesis Statement.This means that you are to choose a position on the subject and be willing to defend it. This also implies that you need to provide at least 2 arguments to support your position. Be realistic about the level of certainty that your thesis claims.

II.Premises at least 2 (arguments to support your thesis). Make sure that your opening sentence of each section is in the form of a logical proposition (Declarative sentence phrased in such a way that it can be either true or false).

III. Response to at least one potential Counter-argument.Anticipate a potential counterargument to your position and respond why it is not strong enough to prove your position false.

IV. Your conclusion. Any final thoughts you may want to include in support of your thesis or about the relevance or importance of the subject you discussed.

Answered 2 days After Jul 20, 2021

Solution

Anurag answered on Jul 22 2021
150 Votes
Last Name:    1
Name:
Professor:
Course:
Date:
Title: Pro-Life vs Pro-Choice
Contents
Introduction    3
Thesis Statement    3
Discussion    4
Conclusion    6
Work Cited    8
Introduction
Depending on the point of view on abortion, different organizations have different definitions. Abortion is defined by most countries across the globe as an illegal act of ending the life of an unborn child that is punished by law. Similarly, the church considers abortion to be a sin because it denies the unborn child the right to life. This notion is founded on the idea that life begins at conception and should be valued and safeguarded as such. However, the widely recognized definition of abortion is the act of terminating a pregnancy with the primary goal of preventing the development of either an em
yo or a fetus in the body. The topic of abortion has sparked a national discussion in the United States, dividing the country into two camps, each holding a different stance on the matter: pro-life and pro-choice. The pro-life movement opposes the concept that pregnant women may choose whether to abort or retain their kids, whereas the pro-choice movement supports abortion and believes that it is a woman's decision whether or not to keep her pregnancy. As a result, this assignment will provide an argumentative essay contrasting pro-choice and pro-life perspectives on abortion.
Thesis Statement
Both the pro-life and pro-choice movements have expanded their discussion and politics on the subject of abortion. Each of the two movements is adamant about its choices, and none is prepared to give up and put an end to the discussion. The topic of abortion is a core of the conflict between a woman's autonomy for pro-choice and the worth of the unborn child for pro-life, according to a critical study of both the ongoing discussion and abortion politics. Those who favor abortion believe that a pregnant woman is the major decider of her pregnancy, which she should make in her own best interests. The organization thinks that a mother's life is more important than that of her child and that it should be prioritized. As a result, a woman should be free to terminate her pregnancy if she believes it is in her best interests. The anti-abortion camp, on the other hand, believes that the unborn child's life is more important than the mother's and that any choice made must put the child's interests above the mother's. This emphasizes the need of finding common ground on the subject of abortion to halt the growing tension between the two parties.
Discussion
Abortion is ethically evil, according to Lanigan, and any culture that advocates it does not safeguard reproductive rights but instead fosters the murder of innocent human life (Goodwin and Chemerinsky). This argument is frequently supported by pro-life advocates, who claim that life begins at conception and, as such, should be safeguarded like any other. It has been difficult to spare childhood separation (the crime of murdering infants) and abortion on the basis that em
yology...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here