SIV
ief policy.docx
Hikmat Babak
Policy
ief outline
Professor: Jennifer Shea, Ph.D.
November 15, 2018
Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs)
SIV stands for Special Immigrant Visa. While there are many categories of SIVs, I will like to discuss only SIVs for eligible Iraqi and Afghan translators/interpreters and employees who have worked directly with the U.S. Armed Forces or under Chief of Mission (COM) authority at U.S. Embassy Baghdad or U.S. Embassy Kabul.
On June 15, 2007 U.S. president J.W Bush signed into a law Section 1059 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, authorizes the issuance of up to 50 Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs) annually to Iraqi and Afghan translators and interpreters working for the U.S. military and who meet certain requirements. An amendment to Section 1059 expanded the total number of visas to 500 per year for FY 2007 and FY 2008 only. In FY 2009, the number of visas available for this category reverted to 50 annually. As amended, the Act provides for SIV status for eligible Iraqi or Afghan translators and interpreters, who have worked directly with the U.S. Armed Forces or under Chief of Mission (COM) authority at the U.S. Embassies in Baghdad Kabul.
Law:
Information about the Law:
1
Section 1059 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law XXXXXXXXXX)
This law allowed up to 50 Iraqi and Afghan translators/interpreters who worked for the U.S. Armed Forces to receive special immigrant visas (SIVs) each fiscal year (FY). This law was later amended and now provides SIV status for eligible Iraqi and Afghan translators/interpreters who have worked either directly with the U.S. Armed Forces or under Chief of Mission (COM) authority at U.S. Embassy Baghdad or U.S. Embassy Kabul.
2
Public Law 110-36
This law, which then-President Bush signed on June 15, 2007, amended the law above by expanding the total number of SIVs issued to Iraqi and Afghan translators/interpreters working for the U.S. military to 500 a year for FY 2007 and FY 2008 only.
3
Public Law XXXXXXXXXX
A provision of this law applies only to cases in which petitions for SIV status as Iraqi or Afghan translators/interpreters who worked directly with the U. S. Armed Forces or under Chief of Mission authority for at least 12 months were filed before October 1, 2008. It authorized the continued processing and adjudication of these applications even though the annual limit of 500 visas had already been reached.
4
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (Public Law XXXXXXXXXXof December 26, 2007)
This law initially made Afghan and Iraqi SIV holders eligible for the same resettlement assistance, entitlement programs, and other benefits as refugees admitted under the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program for up to six (6) months from their date of admission or date of adjustment if applying domestically. The period of eligibility was later extended under subsequent legislation. See these two laws below.
5
The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law XXXXXXXXXXof January 28, 2008)
This law extended the period of eligibility of Iraqi SIV holders for resettlement assistance, entitlement programs, and other benefits to up to eight (8) months from their date of admission or date of adjustment if applying domestically.
6
The Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111-8 of March 10, 2009)
This law extended the period of eligibility of Afghan SIV holders for resettlement assistance, entitlement programs, and other benefits to up to eight (8) months from their date of admission or date of adjustment if applying domestically. For Afghan SIV holders already in the U.S. to be eligible for uninte
upted benefits for an additional two (2) months beyond the original six months (6) allowed under previous law, you must have been admitted to the U.S. on or after September 10, 2008, or if applying domestically, have a date of adjustment of September 10, 2008 or later.
Stakeholders:
· Department of State
· Department of Health
· Department of Human Services
· Federal Government
· Congress
· Nonprofits
Policy Stage: Implemented
Policy Theory: Political Perspective of new administration visa policies, and restrictions affected SIV.
https:
travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/immigrate/siv-iraqi-afghan-translators-interpreters.html
Hi Hikmat,
This is a very
ief reply as I was about to log off of the forum after having commenting on all others. I urge you to read my general comments to the class, which I'll post momentarily, as well as read through comments I made on others' posts for additional insights.
In short:
· You seemed to have sufficiently na
owed your topic and specific policy area
· Don't forget to explicitly identify the policy problem 1059 and its amendments were meant to address
· Further specify stakeholders in
oad categories like Fed govt, Congress, and Nonprofits.
· Identify the 'client' you are writing this policy
ief to, and identify its purpose (beyond an academic one)
· Disentangle specific policy theories from the political perspective and be sure to apply those in your analysis
Good luck with it.
Let me know if you have questions,
Jennife
PA715 Policy
ief stakeholder analysis F18-converted.docx
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM
PA 715: POLICY PROCESS AND CIVIC ENGAGEMENT FALL 2018
Policy Brief Stakeholder Analysis Assignment Description
Primary Assignment
Due: November 30th, 6pm,
Medium & Length:
· Written analysis of 2-3 pages, typed with a 12-point font, double-spaced, with 1 inch margins on all sides.
· Note: If you are working with a classmate on the policy
ief, you should also work with that person on this assignment, so that you would submit just one stakeholder analysis for the two of you.
Percent of Final Grade: 10%
Overview
A key step in the political analysis of a public policy issue is the identification and assessment of key actors (stakeholders) in the process. Now that you have experience conducting stakeholder analysis for the previous assignment, you will apply the course’s literature to assess the interests, actions, and policy influences of stakeholders for the policy issue you are researching for the final policy
ief assignment for this course. You will include some of this stakeholder analysis in that final policy
ief.
Instructions
You may organization your analysis as you wish (e.g., by stakeholder, by level of influence, by policy stage), but it should include at least the information that follows. You may also use tables or diagrams to complement your written analysis, so long as you to integrate those into the na
ative discussion.
1. Policy problem: A
ief description of the policy problem and where it is in the policy cycle. Include, if applicable, any competing policy solutions being debated.
2. Descriptions of the stakeholders
· Identification: Who are the key actors for this policy issue? Which one(s) will be the ‘client’ you write your policy
ief paper for?
· Preferences: What do each of these actors want (e.g., a specific policy solution, policy expansion, evaluation)? Why?
· Leverages: What leverages could each wield in the policy process? Is there evidence that they wield such powers? How, or why not? Has any stakeholder dominated a particular stage of the policy process?
3. Analysis of the stakeholders
· Conflicts: What are the main conflicts among the key actors? Are there conflicting goals,
(
Page
1
of
2
)
or conflicting powers? Are there checks onpowers?
· Existing and potential common ground: Are there coalitions of key actors? Why or why not? Is there the potential (or need) for coalitions to be formed?
· Influence: Who are the most influential actors in this policy issue? What makes them so influential?
· Diagnosis: Given the above analysis, what options does your ‘client’ have in order to get what they want for this policy?
As you answer the above questions, draw upon our course literature on policy actors to analyze the stakeholders’ actions and their influences. You should cite at least 5 relevant sources from our readings (including books reviewed by classmates).
Keep in mind that you will have to do substantial research to conduct a thorough stakeholder analysis. Much of that research may not fit into this paper (or into the final policy
ief); be judicious in identifying key actors and explaining why they are important and influential (or how they can gain influence if that is what is needed).
Info about assignment.docx
My topic is for policy
ief is Special immigration visa SIV https:
travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/immigrate/siv-iraqi-afghan-translators-interpreters.html
Sources:
https:
www.humanrightsfirst.org
esource/afghan-special-immigrant-visa-program
https:
www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/special-immigrants
http:
www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/12/11/afghans-who-worked-for-u-s-government-make-up-growing-share-of-special-immigrant-visa-recipients
https:
www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/07/trump-immigration-crackdown-visas/565949
http:
nooneleft.org
Paper-Policy Brief Stakeholder ass.docx
Hikmat Babak
PA XXXXXXXXXXPolicy Process and Civic Engagement
November 30, 2018
Policy Brief Stakeholder Analysis Assignment Description
1. Policy problem:
The U.S government has been offering Special Immigrant Visa (SIV). While there are many categories of SIVs; this policy paper will focus on 50 SIVs for eligible Iraqi and Afghan translators/interpreters and employees who have worked directly with the U.S. Armed Forces or under Chief of Mission (COM) authority at U.S. Embassy Baghdad or U.S. Embassy Kabul. In the 2007/2008 fiscal year, the federal government increased the number of SIVs available for Iraqis and Afghans to 500. In 2009 the federal government reverted the number of SIVs available for the two nations to 50. The 50 slots are not enough to accommodate thousands of the Afghans and Iraqis whom their lives are treating for supporting the U.S. operations in their countries. Human Rights First XXXXXXXXXXobserved that by March 31, 2018, 11,640 Afghan principal applicants and 12,067 of their family members were still waiting at some point in the application phase with less than 4,000 visas available. With the high demand of SIVs from the U.S wartime allies, the federal government should consider increasing the number of SIVs to 500 or higher to benefit more members from these two countries with resettlement and entitlement programs.
2. Descriptions of the stakeholders:
In the key stakeholders for SIV programs available for the Iraqis and Afghans are the federal government and Congress. The federal government through the Congress can pass the law to increase the number SIVs. The U.S. military operations Afghanistan have been ongoing. The federal government cannot complete its mission there without involving soldiers, cultural advisors, logisticians, embassy clerks, security guards, engineers, and Afghan translator. Many of the U.S. allies and their families face death threats for associating with the U.S. military and government It is the duty of the federal government the American friends, a promise that it made in 2009.
The Afghan Special Immigrant Visa program represents a promise that the federal government made to the American wartime friends. Based on that promise is not only vital to maintaining support of the Afghan people, it is important to completing the U.S mission in Afghanistan and other future wars in which the U.S. may be engaged. Likewise, as the