MGT600_Assessment 3_Part B_Peer Review.Docx XXXXXXXXXXPage 1 of 6
ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF - PART B
Subject Code and Title MGT600 Management, People and Teams
Assessment Part B: Peer Review
Individual/Group Individual
Length Part B Peer Review – up to 1250 words
Learning Outcomes Part B
a) Critically assess the key principles and theories
underlying strategic people management and explain
how their application enhances organisational and
individual performance.
) Critically evaluate the effectiveness of different
approaches and the relationships between effective
people management and organisational performance.
Submission Part B: By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday Module 6.1 (week
11)
Weighting Part B 25%
Total Marks 25 marks
Context:
This assessment is designed for you to experience the challenges that managers face in
thinking strategically, conceptually and analytically to create effective organisations and
productive work environments. You will need to clearly communicate your ideas and critique
the ideas of others. Assessment 3 is in two parts and this is Part B.
In Part A, the thinking focused on strategic issues from modules five and six in relation to
management, people and teams, whilst forcing you to integrate the underlying principles
discussed in earlier modules.
Part B requires you to critique the Part A video of another student. Though challenging, this
process requires you to consolidate your own understanding of relevant concepts and
principles, as well as drawing on your communication skills to provide effective feedback.
MGT600_Assessment 3_Part B_Peer Review.Docx XXXXXXXXXXPage 2 of 6
Instructions:
Part B
You will be required to review the Part A video presentation of another student.
Your facilitator will pair you with another student and you will be provided with a link to
view the relevant presentation. You are not required to meet, hold discussions with or
provide any feedback to the other student. Your review is submitted to the facilitator only.
This review will be a written response of no more than 1250 words and whilst you will have
limited information and understanding of the other student’s context and challenges, you
are to provide feedback in the following:
ï‚· Consideration of relevant theory and concepts and their application to the issues
aised.
ï‚· Integration of concepts and appreciation of their implications
ï‚· Communication style and effectiveness
ï‚· Strengths of the presentation
ï‚· Areas for development or further consideration
Your response should take into consideration the key principles discussed in relation to
communication and performance management.
A constructive review will require you to have a solid understanding of all topics covered in
this subject.
Your review may take a variety of forms but must be within the word limit and include:
ï‚· Cover page
ï‚· A short introduction
ï‚· A review of the presentation including the points mentioned above
ï‚· A short conclusion
ï‚· Reference list
Your review will be assessed against the learning ru
ic below taking into consideration the
above requirements.
Referencing:
You must recognise all sources of information; including images that you can include in your
work. Reference your work according to the APA 6th edition guidelines. Please see more
information on referencing here http:
li
ary.laureate.net.au
esearch_skills
eferencing
http:
li
ary.laureate.net.au
esearch_skills
eferencing
MGT600_Assessment 3_Part B_Peer Review.Docx XXXXXXXXXXPage 3 of 6
Submission Instructions:
Submit your Peer Review analysis in Assessment 3 Part B Peer Analysis submission link in
the Assessment section found in the main navigation menu of the subject Blackboard site. A
u
ic will be attached to the assessment. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via
the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
Marking Ru
ic:
Your reports will be marked against the ru
ic which is show on the next pages. Please
ensure that your submission addresses all four of the Assessment Attributes in the ru
ic.
MGT600_Assessment 3_Part B_ Peer Review Page 4 of 6
Learning Ru
ic: Assessment 3 (Part B) Peer Review
Assessment Attributes
Fail (Unacceptable)
0-49%
Pass
(Functional)
50-64%
Credit
(Proficient)
65-74%
Distinction
(Advanced)
75 -84%
High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
Knowledge and
understanding
(technical and
theoretical knowledge)
Understands theoretical
models and concepts
Percentage for this
criterion
30%
Limited understanding
of required concepts
and knowledge
Key components of the
assignment are not
addressed.
Knowledge or
understanding of the
field or discipline.
Resembles a recall or
summary of key ideas.
Often confuses assertion
of personal opinion with
information
substantiated by
evidence from the
esearch/course
materials.
Thorough knowledge or
understanding of the
field or discipline/s.
Supports personal
opinion and information
substantiated by
evidence from the
esearch/course
materials.
Demonstrates a capacity
to explain and apply
elevant concepts.
Highly developed
understanding of the
field or discipline/s.
Discriminates between
assertion of personal
opinion and information
substantiated by robust
evidence from the
esearch/course
materials and extended
eading.
Well demonstrated
capacity to explain and
apply relevant concepts.
A sophisticated
understanding of the
field or discipline/s.
Systematically and
critically discriminates
etween assertion of
personal opinion and
information
substantiated by robust
evidence from the
esearch/course
materials and extended
eading.
Mastery of concepts and
application to new
situations/further
learning.
Application of
knowledge to practise
Evaluation and critique
Show a clear
understanding of the
practical application and
Limited understanding
of the internal and
external business
environment.
Understands the internal
and external business
environment including
commercial context and
market forces.
Accesses relevant
information.
Understands the impact
of financial, social,
political, environmental
issues on the business.
Understands the
usiness.
Identify logical flaws.
Evaluates the impact of
financial, social, political,
environmental issues on
the business; and where
elevant, as they relate to
different countries where
the business may
operate.
Analyses the impact of
financial, social, political,
environmental issues on
the business; and where
elevant, as they relate to
different countries where
the business may
operate.
MGT600_Assessment 3_Part B_ Peer Review Page 5 of 6
implications of key
concepts and principles
Percentage for this
criterion
30%
Uses a limited range of
information as the basis
of critique and feedback.
Confuses logic and
emotion. Information
taken from reliable
sources but without a
coherent analysis or
synthesis.
Viewpoints of experts
are taken as fact with
little questioning.
Adequately utilises
information from a
variety of sources.
Gathers/utilises
competitor knowledge.
Analysis and evaluation
do not reflect expert
judgement, intellectual
independence, rigor and
adaptability.
Questions viewpoints of
experts.
Understands the
usiness and its risks.
Viewpoint of experts are
subject to questioning.
Analysis and evaluation
eflect growing
judgement, intellectual
independence, rigor and
adaptability.
Holistic understanding of
usiness and its risks.
Information is taken
from sources with a high
level of
interpretation/evaluatio
n to develop a
comprehensive critical
analysis or synthesis.
Identifies gaps in
knowledge.
Exhibits intellectual
independence, rigor,
good judgement and
adaptability.
Effective
Communication
Well-structured report
with clear flow of ideas
Percentage for this
criterion
30%
Difficult to understand
for audience, no
logical/clear structure,
poor flow of ideas,
argument lacks
supporting evidence.
Audience cannot follow
the line of reasoning.
Information, arguments
and evidence are
presented in a way that
is not always clear and
logical.
Line of reasoning is
often difficult to follow.
Information, arguments
and evidence are well
presented, mostly clear
flow of ideas and
arguments.
Line of reasoning is easy
to follow.
Information, arguments
and evidence are very
well presented; the
presentation is logical,
clear and well supported
y evidence.
Demonstrates cultural
sensitivity.
Expertly presented; the
presentation is logical,
persuasive, and well
supported by evidence,
demonstrating a clear
flow of ideas and
arguments.
Engages and sustains
audience’s interest in
the topic, demonstrates
high levels of cultural
sensitivity.
MGT600_Assessment 3_Part B_ Peer Review Page 6 of 6
Co
ect citation of key
esources and evidence
Professional
presentation, well
written and meeting
APA guidelines for
eferencing
Percentage for this
criterion
10%
Demonstrates
inconsistent use of good
quality, credible and
elevant resources to
support and develop
ideas.
Demonstrates use of
credible and relevant
esources to support
and develop ideas, but
these