PPMP20010 Assessment 3 (Written Report) - Marking Sheet.xlsx
PPMP20010: Executing and Closing Projects
Assessment 3 - Critical Analysis Report (Total Marks - 30)
Student ID & Name:
Description Marking Criteria
Marks
Allocated
Marks
Awarded
Marker's Comments
1. Project Information: Is the project snapshot
appropriate? 2
2. Introduction: Is the introduction of the chosen failed
project appropriate? 5
3. Major Issues: Are the issues and problems described
about the project failure appropriate?
8
4. Control Systems: Is the explanation of the range of
control systems used for cost, schedule, quality and
scope reasonable?
15
5. Analysis of cost and/or schedule ove
uns: Are the
easons given for the cost and/or time ove
uns
encountered during the project appropriate?
10
6. Analysis of the project execution team: Is the analysis
of the extent to which the project execution team could
e held responsible of the incu
ed time and/or cost
ove
un appropriate?
10
7. Analysis of relationship between ove
uns and the
stakeholders: Is the analysis of the relationship between
the problems you identified in cost and/or time ove
uns
and the stakeholders expectations appropriate?
10
8. Analysis of possible actions for success: Are the
analysis of the project management actions that could
have been taken to better control the project and
stakeholders in order to increase the chance for
successful delivery appropriate?
10
9. Conclusion: Is the conclusion which identifies the key
lessons that project management can learn from the
experience of the project appropriate?
10
Appropriate and well structured,
concise and clear understanding of
project management arguments in
esponse to the assessment task?
(10%)
Does the report contain substantial evidence of the use
of project management concepts, principles, theories
and arguments about the execution phase, particularly
application, analysis and arguments about the type of
control systems that will enable better or worse project
outcomes?
10
Clarity of expression, language,
format, presentation, references?
(10%)
Clarity of expression, language, format and presentation
of the written report, Are the references provided
co
ectly in an academic manner?
10
Total marks 100 0
Scaled marks 30% 0
Familiarity with the failed project
context, issues and applicable
control systems (30%)
Critical evaluation of the
effectiveness of applied control
systems and stakeholders'
management (50%)
Late Penalty 5% (-5 marks) for each calendar day (either full or part day).
Critical Analysis Presentation on chandrayaan -2
Critical Analysis Presentation on chandrayaan -2
Student name XXXXXXXXXXstudent id
Patel vishalkumar dineshklumar XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX
Patel mayankkumar ashokbhai XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX
Patel vishalkumar bharatbhai XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX
Patel maulik vinodkumar XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX
Project information
Mission type : Lunar o
iter lander rove
Operator : Indian space research organisation (ISRO)
Design complete: August 2009
Mission duration : 2011 to XXXXXXXXXXyears)
Manufacturer: ISRO
Project information
Total weight :3850kg
Launch date : 22 July 2019
Rocket : GSLV Mark ||| M1
Launch site : Satish Dhawan space center second Launch Pad
Landing date: 7th September 2019
introduction
The first Indian planetary mission to the moon, chandrayaan 1 launched on 22nd October 2008 with a suite of Indian and international payloads onboard, collected very significant data over its mission duration of close to one year. Chandryaan 2 the success of chandrayaan 1 o
iter mission provided the impetus to implement the second approved Indian mission to the moon, chandrayaan 2 with an o
iter-Lander-rover configuration.
The lander and wanderer were timetables to a
ive on the close to the side of the moon, in the south pole district at a scope of around 70 degrees south on sixth September 2019 and lead logical examination for one lunar day.
introduction
The Lander strayed from its indented direction while going to a
ive on 6 September 2019 which caused a hard a
iving. As indicated by disappointment examination report submitted to ISRO the accident was
ought about by a product glitch.
This project was developed for a detailed study of topography seismography, mineral, identification and distribution, surface chemical composition, thermophysical characteristics of topsoil, and composition of the origin and evolution of the south pole of the moon.
Major issues
Chandrayaan 2 project was lost its radio connection of lander at the last stage of landing.
Before 7 days of launch, the fuel tank was
oken down and the fuel leaked problem occu
ed.
The capacity of the GSLV MARK III rocket was insufficient to ca
y more weight with it, so it took less fuel in the tank.
Control system
1)Project estimation :-
The approx. cost of the project was more than 600
Carore Indian rupees estimated by ISRO
Chairman.
2)Project budget :-
The Indian government passed the budget
for chandrayyan 2 was 425 carore Indian
rupees in 2008.
Control system
3) EVPM
Chandrayaan-2 is an ISRO (Indian Space Research Organization) mission comprising the 'O
iter Craft' and the 'Lander Craft'. The primary objective of Chandrayaan-2 is to demonstrate the ability to soft-land on the lunar surface and operate a robotic rover on the surface.
The scientific goals include studies of lunar topography, mineralogy, elemental abundance, the lunar exosphere, and signatures of hydroxyl and water ice.
Control system
4)Performance measurement:
For this project it everything goes as planned. Like it was launched at 2:43 pm on Monday and ISRO expects its lander and rover on the moon surface on 7th September and it was completed less than 1000 crore Indian rupees.
Analysis of cost
Chandrayaan 2 mission cost was around 978 crore Indian rupees which includes 603 crore Indian rupees for the o
iter, lander, Rover, navigation and ground support network and 375 crore for the heavy GSLV rocket with indigenous cryogenic engine
Analysis of cost
o
iter The scientific goals of the o
iter are: to study lunar topography, mineralogy, elemental abundance, the lunar exosphere, and signatures of hydroxyl and water ice.
lander The primary objectives of the Chandrayaan-2 lander were to demonstrate the ability to soft-land and operate a robotic rover on the lunar surface.
rover Rover will ca
y out experiments to find water on the lunar surface and map for chemicals and topography. Isro has said that extensive mapping of the lunar surface to study variations in surface composition is essential to trace the origin and evolution of the Moon.
Analysis of the project execution team
Project team work
Kailasavadivoo Sivan- ISRO chairmen He was evaluating project cost and providing all details to the government.
Dr. S Somanath ,
Kunhikrishnan,
J Jayaprakash They were making GSLV MARK III rocket.
Analysis of the project execution team
Project team work
Muthayya Vanitha She was the Chandrayaan-2's Project Director, she was worked on data-handling. Manage all forms of data on the spacecraft. Ca
y out commands sent from Earth. Prepare data for transmission to Earth.
Analysis of relationship between ove
uns and the stakeholders
stakeholders ove
uns
Russian federal space agency (RFSA) or Roscosmos The Indian government and ISRO team were want to purchase Lander, rover, and o
iter from Russia but Russia was declined to give it at the end time and India need to manufactured it and it took a long time for production, so due to the time effect project was ove
uns.
India finance department The Indian government and ISRO team were want to purchase Lander, rover, and o
iter from Russia but Russia was declined to give it at the end time and India need to manufactured it and it took a long time for production, so due to the time effect project ove
an.
Analysis of possible action for success
For the success of chandryaan 2 ISRO scientist and Indian government consider the following factors and take possible actions which I describe under like,
India was want to purchase lander, rover, and o
iter from Russia but at the end time Russia was declined for it.
2) IT Software was also weak so scientists were lost their connection with chandryaan 2 at last stage, If India take help from other countries for Software maybe they didn't lose their connection with the project.
Analysis of possible action for success
3) The budget is also concerned for this project because the Indian government provided very law budget for it so scientists were not able to more experiments and it resulted in the failure of the project.
These three points were most important for project and project team take possible action for success
conclusion