Weight: 40%
Assignment due date: Friday 3 August 2018
Length: 2000 words (inclusive of Parts A and B)
Feedback mode:
Feedback will be provided using ru
ic below and general comments.
Learning Objectives Assessed:
· identify future trends in the nature of work and the implications of these for career development/management
· identify what is needed to know to make informed choices about work life
· state their values, interests and abilities in relation to their career expectations
· develop a personal development plan that enhances employability
· undertake effective research and networking in relation to the job search process
Graduate Outcomes supported:
· Work ready
· Culturally and socially aware
· Active and life long learners
Details:
One of the most challenging things facing an undergraduate student is gaining a true insight into the occupation and the field for which he/she is training. This reflective report provides you with the opportunity to talk to an individual in your field to find out what is happening in your industry and the skills needed to survive in the field, in order to assist you to develop a relevant and meaningful career plan.
PART A. You are required to conduct an "Information Interview" with an individual who is working in an occupation and/or field you would like to work in when you complete your degree. You must then write up your findings. Do not simply provide questions and answers. (For verification purposes, you must include the name, job title and organisation details of your interviewee. Wherever possible attach their business card).
The Information Interview must cover the following aspects:
What has your career path been so far?
What is a typical day in that occupation like?
The positive and negative aspects of the job;
The skills needed to work in the industry;
Future trends/changes in the field;
Opportunities and major employers in the field;
What do employers look for when they recruit graduates?
Strategies for finding a job in the field;
What advice can be given to a new graduate regarding building networks in this field?
You could interview an individual working in the field, a Human Resource Manager or a staff member in a relevant Professional Association e.g. Engineers Australia, (Engineers), CPA (Accountants), AASW (Social Work).
PART B. Evaluate the information you have gathered in the "Information Interview" in relation to what you have learned about yourself during the semester. Using the material from class, evaluate your skills/abilities/values/personality in relation to this field. For example:
In what ways do your interests, values, skills, etc., match this field?
Reflect on one or two theories of career development in relation to yourself and the interviewee.
What skills, abilities and experiences will you need to further develop/acquire to be able to enter and futher develop in your field?
Does this career fit in with your other lifestyle goals?
What is your future career goal?
What actions will you need to take in the next 12 months - 3 years to help each of you reach your career goals?
What do the findings of your interview suggest about the management of your career?
N.B. The above questions are to guide you; however, they should not form the subheadings of your report.
Ru
ic:
SOCU 2089 Industry report ru
ic.pdf
I declare that in submitting all work for this assessment I have read, understood and agree to the content and expectations of the Assessment declarationLinks to an external site..
Ru
ic
Industry Report
Industry Report
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoverage of aspects in interview findings (Part A)
5.0 to >4.0 pts
High Distinction
Coverage of all aspects with evidence of wider discussion with interviewee and asking of own questions.
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Distinction
Coverage of all aspects with evidence of wider discussion with interviewee.
3.0 to >2.5 pts
Credit
Coverage of all aspects.
2.5 to >1.0 pts
Pass
Coverage of the majority of aspects.
1.0 to >0 pts
Fail
Limited coverage of aspects.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThemes covered in report (Part B)
5.0 to >4.0 pts
High Distinction
Coverage of all themes demonstrating in depth thinking behind decisions about own career.
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Distinction
Coverage of all themes demonstrating thinking behind decisions about own career.
3.0 to >2.5 pts
Credit
Coverage of all themes.
2.5 to >1.0 pts
Pass
Coverage of the majority of themes.
1.0 to >0 pts
Fail
Coverage of some themes.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegration of course content (Part B)
5.0 to >4.0 pts
High Distinction
Course content well integrated to indicate how it has and will influence thinking.
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Distinction
Reflective use of course content to inform thinking in one or more themes.
3.0 to >2.5 pts
Credit
Use of course content to inform thinking about two themes or of two theories in a theme.
2.5 to >1.0 pts
Pass
Use of one aspect of course content to inform thinking in one theme.
1.0 to >0 pts
Fail
No mention of course content.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of career plan. (Part B)
5.0 to >4.0 pts
High Distinction
Plan has specific goals (SMART) with well-defined strategies related to goals and the development of skills, abilities and experiences related to goal achievement including resources and timeline.
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Distinction
Plan has a
oad career objective, specific goals (SMART) with defined strategies related to goals and the development of skills, abilities and experiences related to goal achievement.
3.0 to >2.5 pts
Credit
Plan has a
oad career objective with defined strategies related to
oadly written goals. Timeframe clearly identified for goal achievement and strategy completion.
2.5 to >1.0 pts
Pass
Plan has future goals and limited strategies for next 1-3 years. Timeframe clearly identified for goal achievement.
1.0 to >0 pts
Fail
Plan has vague goals and no strategies for achievement.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection on interview findings (Part B)
5.0 to >4.0 pts
High Distinction
Evidence of use of career interview findings in reflection about suitability for chosen industry and further development. Use of interview findings in career plan and the longer term.
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Distinction
Evidence of use of career interview findings in reflection about suitability for chosen industry and further development.Use of interview findings to inform career plan.
3.0 to >2.5 pts
Credit
Evidence of use of career interview findings in reflection about suitability for chosen industry and further development.
2.5 to >1.0 pts
Pass
Evidence of use of career interview findings in reflection about suitability for chosen industry.
1.0 to >0 pts
Fail
No evidence of use of career interview findings in Part B.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence of further reading
esearch (Part B)
5.0 to >4.0 pts
High Distinction
Evidence of further reading about more than one career theory introduced and used to explain own career. Includes theory not introduced in class. Includes co
ect referencing in text and reference list.
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Distinction
Evidence of further reading about more than one career theory introduced and used to explain own career. Includes referencing in text and reference list.
3.0 to >2.5 pts
Credit
Evidence of further reading about more than one career theory introduced in class. Some ability to express in own words. Includes reference list and in text referencing.
2.5 to >1.0 pts
Pass
Evidence of further reading about a career theory introduced in class. Relies on words and passages copied from text. Attempts referencing.
1.0 to >0 pts
Fail
No evidence of further reading or research.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganisation & structure (Part A&B)
5.0 to >4.0 pts
High Distinction
Creative presentation of information that is sound throughout and supports logical exposition. Interview findings presented in paragraphs.
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Distinction
Structure is sound throughout and supports logical exposition. Interview findings presented as paragraphs.
3.0 to >2.5 pts
Credit
Content is generally organised logically with some sections needing more attention. Interview findings presented as paragraphs.
2.5 to >1.0 pts
Pass
Structure is just sufficient to present the content. Ideas often presented in disorganised manner. Interview findings presented as Q&A.
1.0 to >0 pts
Fail
Report lacks coherent structure, interview findings presented as Q&A.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting mechanics: Spelling, grammar punctuation (A & B)
5.0 to >4.0 pts
High Distinction
Accurate punctuation, grammar and spelling throughout the report.
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Distinction
No e
ors in spelling, with some grammar and/or punctuation e
ors.
3.0 to >2.5 pts
Credit
Few e
ors in spelling, punctuation and grammar.
2.5 to >1.0 pts
Pass
Grammar, spelling and punctuation acceptable.
1.0 to >0 pts
Fail
Poor use of spelling, grammar and punctuation.
5.0 pts
Total Points: 40.0
Microsoft Word - Document2
SOCU
2089
Assessment
Ru
ics-‐
Industry
Report
40%
SCORE:
N Fail (0-1) P Pass (1-2) CR Credit (2-3) DI Distinction (3-4) HD High Distinction (4-5) Score
Coverage of aspects in
interview findings (Part
A)
Limited coverage of aspects. Coverage of the majority of
aspects.
Coverage of all aspects. Coverage of all aspects with
evidence of wider discussion
with interviewee.
Coverage of all aspects with
evidence of wider discussion
with interviewee and asking of
own questions.
Themes covered in report
(Part B)
Coverage of some themes. Coverage of the majority of
themes.
Coverage of all themes. Coverage of all themes
demonstrating thinking behind
decisions.
Coverage of all themes
demonstrating in depth thinking
ehind decisions.
Integration of course
content (Part B)
No mention of course content. Use of one aspect of course
content to inform thinking in one
theme.
Use of course content to inform
thinking about two themes or of
two theories in a theme.
Reflective use of course content
to inform thinking in one or
more themes.
Course content well integrated
to indicate how it has and will
influence thinking about career
management.
Quality of career plan.
(Part B)
Plan has vague goals and no
strategies for achievement.
Plan has future goals and
limited strategies for next 1-3
years. Timeframe clearly
identified for goal achievement.
Plan has a
oad career
objective with defined strategies
elated to
oadly written goals.
Timeframe clearly identified for
goal achievement and strategy
completion.
Plan has a
oad career
objective, specific goals
(SMART) with defined
strategies related to goals and
the development of skills,
abilities and experiences related
to goal achievement.
Plan has specific goals
(SMART) with well-defined
strategies related to goals and
the development of skills,
abilities and experiences related
to goal achievement including
esources and timeline.
Reflection on interview
findings (Part B)
No evidence of