| Criteria* | HD – Outstanding Achievement 85% - 100% | DI - High Achievement 75% - 84% | CR - Above Satisfactory Achievement 65% - 74% | PS - Satisfactory Achievement 50% - 64% | FL - Unsatisfactory Achievement XXXXXXXXXX% |
| 1.Identifies and discusses the main argument, and expresses opinion on management ideas(200 words = 2 marks)[meets subject LO2/4] | Identifies, justifies, and analyses main argument comprehensively, coherently, and engagingly in own words. | Identifies, justifies, and discusses main argument coherently in own words. | Identifies and provides a limited discussion of main argument in own words. | Identifies and provides a rudimentary outline of main argument using own words, although some quotations are included and appropriately cited. | Main argument is not accurately or clearly outlined or discussed in own words. |
| 2.Identifies and discusses assumptions and limitations inherent in information about management (200 words = 2 marks) [meets subject LO1] | Provides analytical data and justifies identification and discussion of assumptions and limitations, using suitably selected own words | Provides and justifies identification and discussion of assumptions and limitations, using suitably selected own words. | Provides satisfactory identification of assumptions and limitations, and discussion in own words. | Provides rudimentary identification and discussion of assumptions and limitations, using own words. | Provides poor identification and discussion of assumptions and limitations, expressed poorly or not in own words. |
| 3.Identifies and discusses the main conclusions in research inherent in information about management(150 words = 4 marks) [meets subject LO1] | Provides analytical data and justifies identification and discussion of main findings and/or conclusions, using well considered own words. | Provides and justifies identification and discussion of main findings and/or conclusions, using suitably selected own words. | Provides satisfactory identification and discussion of main findings and/or conclusions, in own words. | Provides rudimentary identification and discussion of main findings and/or conclusions, mainly using own words. | Provides poor identification and discussion of main findings and/or conclusions, expressed poorly or not in own words. |
| 4.Identifies and discusses main ideas in article relevant to MGT XXXXXXXXXXwords = 3 marks) [meets subject LO2] | Provides analytical data and justifies identification and discussion of main ideas in article relevant to MGT100, using well considered own words. | Provides and justifies identification and discussion of main ideas in article relevant to MGT100, using suitably selected own words. | Provides satisfactory identification and discussion of main ideas in article relevant to MGT100, in own words. | Provides rudimentary identification and discussion of main ideas in article relevant to MGT100, using own words. | Provides poor identification and discussion of main ideas in article relevant to MGT100 expressed poorly or not in own words. |
| 5.Discussed an example of a real business and the CSR approach that business followed. (450 words = 6 marks) [meets subject LO5] | Cogently, comprehensively, and coherently analyses relevant dilemmas, problems, practical applications, and recommendations for real life managers. | Discusses and justifies choice of relevant dilemmas, problems, practical applications, and recommendations for real life managers. | Identifies and explains relevant dilemmas, problems, practical applications, and recommendations for real life managers. | Identifies relevant dilemmas, problems, practical applications, and recommendations for real life managers. | Discussion is difficult to understand, inaccurate, irrelevant, or relies heavily on quotations which may not be appropriately cited and acknowledged. |
6.Demonstrates requisite APA6th citation and referencing skills, and discusses relevancy.(up to 150 words = 2 marks)
[meets subject LO1] | 2 highly relevant peer reviewed journal articles presented in perfect APA6th style.Provides analytical discussion on relevancy. | 2 very relevant peer reviewed journal articles presented in near-perfect APA6th style. Provides and justifies discussion on relevancy. | 2 relevant peer reviewed journal articles presented in near-perfect of APA6th referencing style. Provides satisfactory discussion on relevancy. | 2 potentially relevant peer reviewed journal articles presented in near-perfect APA6th referencing style. Provides rudimentary discussion on relevancy. | |
| 7.Demonstrates requisite quotation skills.(up to 100 words = 1 mark)[meets subject LO1] | Quotation, paraphrase, and citations are clear and accurate, and conform exactly to APA 6 referencing conventions. | Quotation, paraphrase, and citations mostly conform to APA 6 referencing conventions, although there may be one or two minor formatting errors or the paraphrase may lack clarity or relevance. | Quotation, paraphrase, and citations mostly conform to APA 6 referencing conventions, although there may be several minor formatting errors or the paraphrase may be unclear or inaccurate. | Quotation, paraphrase, and citations mostly conform to APA 6 referencing conventions, although there may be several minor formatting errors and the paraphrase may be unclear and/or inaccurate. | Unsatisfactory sentences and/or poor attempt at indirect/direct citation techniques.Quotation, paraphrase, and citations do not conform to APA 6 referencing conventions, inaccuracies in referencing techniques impact transparency and/or traceability, or the sentences are incoherent. |
| *Students must use the CSU American Psychological Association (APA6th) referencing style. Penalties may be applied for:10% over word limit / failure to cite sources / referencing errors / omissions / plagiarism (see Handbook - suspected plagiarism will be reported and can be penalised severely) |