Ru
ic
Formal lab report ru
ic v051420
Formal lab report ru
ic v051420
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle page
2.0 to >0.0 pts
Includes all required information.
0.0 pts
Missing more than two pieces of information.
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAbstract
3.0 to >0.0 pts
Includes objective/purpose, what was done, key results, and conclusions. Is concise (much less than 250 words) and clear.
0.0 pts
Incomplete. Is unclear or long.
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction - relevant background research
6.0 to >0.0 pts
Includes relevant background research from at least two reliable sources outside of a textbook and lab manual.
0.0 pts
Missing. Or does not extend to new knowledge. Or not relevant or reliable.
6.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction - importance and purpose
3.0 to >0.0 pts
Importance of the work and purpose/objective of the experiment are clearly stated.
0.0 pts
Missing. Or only implied.
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction - Gives a
ief preview of the whole report
1.0 to >0.0 pts
Gives a
ief preview of the whole report.
0.0 pts
Missing the purpose or major operations/techniques of the lab.
1.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExperimental Procedure - description
6.0 to >0.0 pts
Gives a succinct, clearly stated, and original description of instrumentation/procedures - in past, impersonal tense.
0.0 pts
Missing. Or may have some tense e
ors, inco
ect information, or be missing key points.
6.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExperimental Procedure - significant outcomes
4.0 to >0.0 pts
Identifies all aspects of observations/equipment/procedure that are significant to the outcome of the experiment.
0.0 pts
Missing multiple key observations and steps. Or e
oneous.
4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExperimental Procedure - raw data only
1.0 to >0.0 pts
Clearly states results (raw data) of the procedure without interpretation.
0.0 pts
Data is explained in procedure section.
1.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion - results and analysis
6.0 to >1.0 pts
All results have an analysis of why they occu
ed.
1.0 to >0 pts
Some interpretation of results, but incomplete or e
oneous.
6.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion - all results
3.0 to >0.0 pts
All results that support conclusions are identified.
0.0 pts
Missing multiple pieces of data that point to the conclusion.
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion - e
o
1.0 to >0.0 pts
Results that do not support conclusions are explained. Analysis of e
or is more than human e
or.
0.0 pts
Missing any e
or discussion.
1.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion - significance
1.0 to >0.0 pts
Significance of results is discussed.
0.0 pts
Missing any discussion of significance.
1.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusions
1.0 to >0.0 pts
The conclusion that follows from the results is clearly stated. No new information is introduced.
0.0 pts
Missing. Or introduces new ideas that were not explained in the body of the report.
1.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences - all sources
3.0 to >0.0 pts
All sources are listed. Sources are reliable.
0.0 pts
Missing references - this could mean an F for plagiarism. Or unreliable references.
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences - co
ect form
3.0 to >0.0 pts
Co
ect form for in-text citations and reference list is used.
0.0 pts
Missing references or in-text citations. Or inco
ect format.
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppendices
3.0 to >0.0 pts
Calculations, raw data (spectra) and notebook pages are included in the appendices. Data are accurate and precise.
0.0 pts
Missing
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProper gramma
eadability
5.0 to >0.0 pts
Proper grammar, ve
tense, and spelling are used. Prose is clear and precise throughout report.
0.0 pts
Proofreading is required. Keep in mind that you can visit the writing center.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrde
1.0 to >0.0 pts
All sections are logical and easy to follow.
0.0 pts
Sections out of order.
1.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScientific writing style
3.0 to >0.0 pts
Scientific writing style is followed.
0.0 pts
Scientific writing is not used. Tense or personal voice e
ors or unit or nomenclature/definition e
ors.
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction - chemical structures
4.0 to >0.0 pts
Includes chemical structures, or a mechanism if a reaction was done.
0.0 pts
Missing or e
oneous.
4.0 pts
Total Points: 60.0
Spectroscopic Identification Dry La
Spectroscopic Identification Dry La
Unknown X
Unknown
Your unknown is one of the structures discussed in this blog: https:
logs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2014/08/27/the_smallest_drugs
You will identify the molecule from the given spectra: IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and MS.
Intro
The introduction for your lab report should give the reader sufficient background information to understand each aspect of the experiment. Consider the following topics:
Small molecule drugs
Infrared spectroscopy
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy
Mass spectrometry
Make sure to use at least two reliable references outside of the textbook.
Procedure
Watch the videos on each technique and make sure to note the sampling method for your procedural description (pretend that you were the experimenter in the video).
You do not have to record each keystroke on the computer for a spectrometer since anyone with that instrument would be able to look that up.
What you do need are the specific directions on how your sample was prepared (as much information as the videos give you) – was it neat (pure liquid, no solvent), in a deuterated solvent, with a reference standard, etc.
Discussion
Make sure that your discussion includes complete information about how you identified you unknown using each spectrometric technique!
See the ru
ic in the formal lab report submission document for more details on each part of the report.
Video Background
IR
https:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDTIJgIh86E
https:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=1h7bfY5E82I
NMR
https:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNM801B9Y84
https:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGz4IttSEFA (through 1:50)
MS
https:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-wao0O0_qM
Unknown X IR Spectrum
Unknown X 1H NMR Spectrum
Unknown X 13C NMR Spectrum
Unknown X Mass Spectrum
Spectroscopic Identification Dry La
Spectroscopic Identification Dry La
Unknown X
Unknown
Your unknown is one of the structures discussed in this blog: https:
logs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2014/08/27/the_smallest_drugs
You will identify the molecule from the given spectra: IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and MS.
Intro
The introduction for your lab report should give the reader sufficient background information to understand each aspect of the experiment. Consider the following topics:
Small molecule drugs
Infrared spectroscopy
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy
Mass spectrometry
Make sure to use at least two reliable references outside of the textbook.
Procedure
Watch the videos on each technique and make sure to note the sampling method for your procedural description (pretend that you were the experimenter in the video).
You do not have to record each keystroke on the computer for a spectrometer since anyone with that instrument would be able to look that up.
What you do need are the specific directions on how your sample was prepared (as much information as the videos give you) – was it neat (pure liquid, no solvent), in a deuterated solvent, with a reference standard, etc.
Discussion
Make sure that your discussion includes complete information about how you identified you unknown using each spectrometric technique!
See the ru
ic in the formal lab report submission document for more details on each part of the report.
Video Background
IR
https:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDTIJgIh86E
https:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=1h7bfY5E82I
NMR
https:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNM801B9Y84
https:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGz4IttSEFA (through 1:50)
MS
https:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-wao0O0_qM
Unknown X IR Spectrum
Unknown X 1H NMR Spectrum
Unknown X 13C NMR Spectrum
Unknown X Mass Spectrum
Ru
ic
Formal lab report ru
ic v051420
Formal lab report ru
ic v051420
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle page
2.0 to >0.0 pts
Includes all required information.
0.0 pts
Missing more than two pieces of information.
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAbstract
3.0 to >0.0 pts
Includes objective/purpose, what was done, key results, and conclusions. Is concise (much less than 250 words) and clear.
0.0 pts
Incomplete. Is unclear or long.
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction - relevant background research
6.0 to >0.0 pts
Includes relevant background research from at least two reliable sources outside of a textbook and lab manual.
0.0 pts
Missing. Or does not extend to new knowledge. Or not relevant or reliable.
6.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction - importance and purpose
3.0 to >0.0 pts
Importance of the work and purpose/objective of the experiment are clearly stated.
0.0 pts
Missing. Or only implied.
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction - Gives a
ief preview of the whole report
1.0 to >0.0 pts
Gives a
ief preview of the whole report.
0.0 pts
Missing the purpose or major operations/techniques of the lab.
1.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExperimental Procedure - description
6.0 to >0.0 pts
Gives a succinct, clearly stated, and original description of instrumentation/procedures - in past, impersonal tense.
0.0 pts
Missing. Or may have some tense e
ors, inco
ect information, or be missing key points.
6.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExperimental Procedure - significant outcomes
4.0 to >0.0 pts
Identifies all aspects of observations/equipment/procedure that are significant to the outcome of the experiment.
0.0 pts
Missing multiple key observations and steps. Or e
oneous.
4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExperimental Procedure - raw data only
1.0 to >0.0 pts
Clearly states results (raw data) of the procedure without interpretation.
0.0 pts
Data is explained in procedure section.
1.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion - results and analysis
6.0 to >1.0 pts
All results have an analysis of why they occu
ed.
1.0 to >0 pts
Some interpretation of results, but incomplete or e
oneous.
6.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion - all results
3.0 to >0.0 pts
All results that support conclusions are identified.
0.0 pts
Missing multiple pieces of data that point to the conclusion.
3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion - e
o
1.0 to >0.0 pts
Results that do not support conclusions are explained. Analysis of e
or is more than human e
or.
0.0 pts
Missing any e
or discussion.
1.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion - significance
1.0 to >0.0 pts
Significance of results is discussed.
0.0 pts
Missing any discussion of significance.
1.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusions
1.0 to >0.0 pts
The conclusion that follows from the results is clearly stated. No new information is introduced.
0.0 pts
Missing. Or introduces new ideas that were not explained in the body of the report.
1.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences - all sources
3.0 to >0.0 pts
All sources are listed. Sources are reliable.
0.0 pts
Missing