1- Throughout the text I believe I saw several public administration concepts from the different phases of the policy-making process potentially at play, and my first question is: Do you see any of the following public administration concepts in application throughout the text and, if so, can you help me understand which concepts are most applicable to the content of the book and why? I've listed the concepts and phases I've identified as possible starting points.
Problem Definition Phase:
· Constructivism: "stands in contradistinction to empiricism (rational theory) because rather than 'mi
or' reality, journalists present a socially constructed conception of realityÂ
· Policy Na
ative:
· Policy Frame:Â
· Causal Story:
· Target Population:Â
· Policy Instrument:
· Steering A
angement:
· Unintended Consequences
Agenda Setting Phase:
1. Agenda Universe:
2. Societal Agenda
3. Political Agenda
4. Decision Making Agenda
5. Policy Agenda
· Referential Framework
· Path Dependency
· Bounded Rationality
Policy Actors Phase:
· Advocacy Coalitions
· Policy Networks etc.
2- Second question stems from a direct quote from our textbook. Matthew Cahn, in Institutional and Non-institutional Actors in the Policy Process, notes that television news "to a great extent, defines which problems the public considers most serious. [...] Priming refers to the selective coverage of only certain events and the selective way in which those events are covered. Since there is no way to cover all events, or cover any event completely, selective decisions must be made. But, there are consequences. (Theodoulou, Cahn, pp. 203)"Â
Is there a specific example in the book of the policy consequences, both intended and unintended, of the use of such framing and selection techniques in a present-day context, where the success--or failure--of a policy program depended on the use of these 'priming' techniques on Western televised media? Can you think of any others?