Your organization is planning to negotiate on a project comprising remediating footpaths, car parks and line marking around RAAF Base Point Cook and RAAF Williams Laverton. The scope also includes...

CIVIL ENGINEERING
Table of Contents
Introduction    4
Initiating Decision Making Actions    4
Establishing Rule of Procedure    4
Identifying Information Needs of Participants    4
Actively Encouraging Free Exchange of Information    5
Encouraging Realistic Decisions for the Situation    5
Negotiation Plan    5
Procurement    5
Supplier    5
Location and Expected Duration    6
Reasons for Negotiation    6
Probity    6
Procurement Conduct Plan    7
Probity Advisor    7
Negotiation Protocol    7
Government Information Act    7
Reporting    7
Research    7
Interest    8
Our Strengths and Weaknesses    8
Risk    8
Competitive Pressure    8
Alternatives to a Negotiated Agreement    8
Our Objectives    8
Their Objectives    8
Negotiation Points    8
Best Case Scenario    9
Bottom Line    9
Approvals    9
Legislative, Organisation and Site Requirements and Procedures    9
Manufacturer’s Guidelines and Specifications    9
Australian Standards    10
Employment and Workplace Relations Legislation    10
Equal Employment Opportunity and Disability Discrimination Legislation    10
Role Play    10
Conclusion    12
References    13
Introduction
The term “negotiation” is states as the approach of accomplishing the point where parties can settle so that dispute and conflict can be resolved. The present report aims to discuss the key aspects when it comes to negotiation. It will provide the great insight related to negotiation and assessing the outcomes.
Initiating Decision Making Actions
The aspect of decision-making has the powerful impact on the way the negotiators are mandated by their principles. The key focus of this negotiation is on the entailing the modification and refu
ishment of existing facilities in order to meet their new function criteria. According to the criteria, only single person is bound to take the decision however, in negotiation project of remediating footpath and car parking around the RAAF base point cook gives the authority to the committee to take decisions (Lewis et al. 2017). For instance, a committee could take the decision to allow this project in order to provide drivers with an auditory warning in their cross lines. Moreover, they have to be cautious regarding both the parties’ issues and effectiveness.
Establishing Rule of Procedure
Negotiation settlement is based on the three categories where parties want to settle the dispute of making car parking, line marking and footpaths around RAAF base cook point. In first category, both the parties are including the points of settlement such as safety of people. Second category includes synergy of interests where one party tries to work not from partial interest (He et al. 2018).
This means both the parties can work mutually to ensure the government project for people’s safety and their success. Apart from this, the third category includes compensation and compromise, where RAAF base will be the part of compromise for the good treatment of road and maintaining the position. The compensation involves both the parties because giving money for the project will make the base effective and safety would help the next party with the success and faith.
Identifying Information Needs of Participants
This information involves that participants are, in which party’s favour by thinking through the considerations like what they should do, what will be right to do and point of leverage they can have by being for stand for the right party. The need of the participant is for the project of developing such growth such as footpaths, car parking and line marketing around the base cook point. Their main perspective is to look towards the rise in economy and the gigantic potential of the economic point could be argued for the following project (Cao et al. 2018).
Actively Encouraging Free Exchange of Information
The negotiation project should be positive at the end of footpaths, car parking and line marking around RAAF base cook point. This can be supported by the comparative power, which is structural and decisive as well as the power will enforce or weaken the relevant force power. For instance, in the case of this project negotiation about development of footpaths, line walking and car parking aids the RAAF base cook point to ensure the success from agreeing with the project of safety as well as developing the economic condition more effectively (Attarzadeh et al. 2017). They have the support of government of Australia and thus, the project can be build up with the aid of power process and relevant resources. Based on this, only expectations can be fulfilled with the favourable negotiation process as far as the government is concerned with the growth.
Encouraging Realistic Decisions for the Situation
The organisation should be based on the community forms a construction of footpath and the support will be given by the technical team in order to enhance the footpath, line walking and car parking. It particularly overcomes the specific issues along the path. The company requires having the technical support when it becomes to the local te
ain. This collection of stone routes includes sample documents that can be used to draught agreements between communities and the technical assistance team. It is vital for the project to work with the harmony because it needs to enhance the technical assistance from the communities that are been used by the different paths. The community has already recognised an influential, delegate footpath, line walking and parking group with the strong support of the group of people and skill to mobilise the community's required contribution to enhance its track and path.
Negotiation Plan
Procurement
    Bidde
    A joint venture or organisation who is responsible for submitting the work goods and services of non-consulting response to the bid
    Observe
    Contracto
    A firm that provides contract for then...