You are required to write a descriptive critical review of the following academic article:Mulcahy, S., and Seear, K XXXXXXXXXXOn tables, doors and listening spaces: Parliamentary human rights scrutiny processes and engagement of others.Australian Journal of Human Rights,28(2), XXXXXXXXXX.The descriptive critical review will need to include: An introduction and conclusion. These should be short and sharp. The introduction should identify the fact that you are doing a review of the article, and mention both the author and the article you are reviewing. Also identify here (with a sentence) the significance of the article; A summary of the author’s argument; Identification of the significance of the argument. To answer this, try to answer the following questions: Why is this argument important? How does it contribute to wider debates about human rights in Australia? Use of scholarly sources. A minimum of 5 scholarly sources need to be used. This does NOT include the review article, which must also be cited in the references list; A reference list/bibliography; APA7 (in-text) referencing. The in-text referencing is counted in the word count. The references list is not included in the word count.

You are required to write a descriptive critical review of the following academic article:Mulcahy, S., and Seear, K XXXXXXXXXXOn tables, doors and listening spaces: Parliamentary human rights scrutiny...

1 answer below »

You are required to write a descriptive critical review of the following academic article:

Mulcahy, S., and Seear, K XXXXXXXXXXOn tables, doors and listening spaces: Parliamentary human rights scrutiny processes and engagement of others.Australian Journal of Human Rights,28(2), XXXXXXXXXX.

The descriptive critical review will need to include:

An introduction and conclusion. These should be short and sharp. The introduction should identify the fact that you are doing a review of the article, and mention both the author and the article you are reviewing. Also identify here (with a sentence) the significance of the article;

A summary of the author’s argument;

Identification of the significance of the argument. To answer this, try to answer the following questions:

Why is this argument important?

How does it contribute to wider debates about human rights in Australia?

Use of scholarly sources. A minimum of 5 scholarly sources need to be used. This does NOT include the review article, which must also be cited in the references list;

A reference list/bibliography;

APA7 (in-text) referencing. The in-text referencing is counted in the word count. The references list is not included in the word count.

on-tables-doors-and-listening-spaces-parliamentary-human-rights-scrutiny-processes-and-engagement-of-others-1-ugs3wrkc-djwkmaj4.pdf

Answered Same Day Aug 07, 2023

Solution

Bidusha answered on Aug 08 2023

27 Votes

SOLUTION.PDF

You are required to write a descriptive critical review of the following academic article:Mulcahy, S., and Seear, K XXXXXXXXXXOn tables, doors and listening spaces: Parliamentary human rights scrutiny...

Solution

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment