Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

The project i choose is adelaide O-Bahn Busway Pls follow this doc carefully (and the feedback doc. )! The assessment result should be looks like the examples I give. Assessment #2 - Project Analysis...

1 answer below »
The project i choose is adelaide O-Bahn Busway
Pls follow this doc carefully (and the feedback doc. )!
The assessment result should be looks like the examples I give.
Assessment #2 - Project Analysis Report
Value: 35% Length: 1500 words
Assessment Description
The main objective of this project analysis report is to reinforce the importance of project definition and needs identification in the initial phase of the project life cycle. The success of a project is affected by the way a project’s objective(s) is defined, planned and managed. Unfortunately, successful project managers do fail; the key difference in strategic project management is that they learn from their mistakes. Project managers also learn from their successes and are constantly searching for new strategies to further improve their projects. In highly successful projects you are likely to find an excellent and valuable project team, a motivated project manager and a very efficient project structure.
This assessment is designed to lead you through the systematic analysis and evaluation of a project. Your role is to critically analyse one real project. It is important that you do not summarise what happened in the project but instead systematically analyse and offer critical comments and insights based on your understanding of project management.
The Project Search for a real project. You can choose a project that was completed successfully or one that was not completed successfully. We encourage the selection of projects related to your field of study (i.e. Health, Art, IT, Management, Aviation, Construction, Engineering, etc). However, you are free to select any project EXCEPT one of the following projects.
· New Royal Adelaide Hospital
· Adelaide Oval Project
· Adelaide Tramline Extension Project
· Beijing Olympics 2008
Instructions You are encouraged to search the Web for your selected project and to collect any information about the project, making sure to cover different viewpoints. This could include searching in newspapers, project management magazines, and journals.
Write a report that critically analyses how the project was planned and performed. The report should include:
1. Executive Summary
Brief summary of the report.
2. A
ief introduction to the project.
Provide an overview of the project you have analysed. This should explain what the project was and the context in which it took place. Also, include clear identification of the objective(s) and scope of the project.
3. A project stakeholder analysis.
Identify the key stakeholders and describe how they were involved/contributed to the project.
4. A
ief description of how the project was managed (e.g. strategy, key events, tools used etc).
Describe the implementation phase of the project. In particular, explain whether the project ran to plan – in which case explain the benefits of careful planning to the project manager. Alternatively, if the project deviated from the plan, why did this occur and what was the impact of these deviations on the project?
5. A critical analysis of the project outcome (i.e. the critical factors that made this project a success or a failure).
6. Conclude by reflecting on the project and your analysis. What did you learn? What good practices will you, as a manager, take from this to future projects? What activities would you not do in the future and why?
7. Recommendation/s to improve the project work in the future (based on what you have learned from this course).
8. References at least five references are required (i.e., website, journal articles, books, newspapers etc.). References are required wherever you have used the ideas from a source. For this assessment that might mean you only refer to sources where you have found information on the project and those that refer to theories and concepts covered in the course.
9. Appendices as appropriate.
Word limit for this assessment is 1500 words and should be formatted using 1.5 line spacing, Times New Roman font and a font size of 12pt. The word limit does not include the references, appendix or the executive summary. Guidelines on writing a report can be accessed at https:
lo.unisa.edu.au/course/view.php?id=4074§ionid=470914

Feedback
The assessment will be marked according to the criteria and standards outlined in the feedback sheet.

Assessment Feedback
UniSA Business
INFS XXXXXXXXXXProject Management: Principles and Strategies
Assignment 2: Project Analysis Report (1500 Word limit) - 35 % of final grade
The Graduate qualities being assessed by this assignment are: Demonstration and
application of a body of knowledge about project management skills and, in particular, project
analysis (GQ 4 32.5%) that supports the use of a decision making model and critical thinking for
problem solving (GQ3 55%). Issues pertaining to project communication are also assessed
(GQ612.5%).
Key components of this assignment Y/N/? Comments
1. Content
1.1 Has the project been analysed critically and with
depth?
1.2 Are the key issues addressed?
1.3 Is there a consideration of
qualitative/quantitative information while
assessing the environment and the project key
issues?
1.4 Is there a logical analysis of the project
management system and/or international
trends?
1.5 Has the outcome of the project been discussed
argumentatively and with adequate
justification?
2. Language
2.1 Principles of effective business writing
2.2 Co
ect grammar
2.3 Co
ect in-text citation
2.4 Coherent and comprehensible
3. Structure
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Stakeholder Analysis
3.3 Project Description
3.4 Critical Analysis
3.5 Conclusion
3.6 Recommendations
3.7 Appendices
Grade




Project Management
Executive Summary
The following context will incorporate a critical analysis on the project management
processes of the Karntama Village undertaken by Decmil Group Ltd. It was formed in 1979
and is nationally known as the leading provider in engineering construction, maintenance and
industrial service to Australian resources, energy and infrastructure sectors. The overall
objective of DGL as a large service provider entails a reliable delivery of achieving unique
and cost effective projects – its main focus on village accommodation with the incorporation
of excellent quality and all round safety in order to maintain their impeccable reputation in
their field. Decmil was initially requested to design and construct the Karntama Village in
Western Australia by The Fortescue Metals Group.
In order to exert the relevant information on the project management dealings throughout the
development of the Karntama Village, a number of critical studies will be provided. Firstly,
the scope of the project is delivered in order to demonstrate the importance what the village
ings to the community, identification of the key stakeholders with their major roles and
esponsibilities in the development is identified and analysed, a vital consideration of
acknowledging the project management process is categorised, as well as the careful
inte
elation between the business and project strategy. In addition, a SWOT (strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis and a risk assessment are initiated in order to
withhold awareness of any unexpected conditions that may arise during a construction
development.
Finally, to conclude the analytical report, a clarification of the projects key phases and
success factors are conveyed to demonstrate the potential impact a project can have when
following the fundamental procedures of project management.
Introduction and Scope
The following context will incorporate a critical analysis on the project management
processes of the Karntama Village undertaken by Decmil Australia. Decmil Australia is
nationally known as the leading provider in engineering construction, maintenance and
industrial service to Australian resources, energy and infrastructure sectors (Decmil Group
limited n.d). According to Criddle (2011), the initial project objective is to design and
construct an accommodation village as part of Fortescue’s Christmas Creek Expansion with a
contract value of $137 million and a time constraint of twenty-one months. The requirement
in undertaking this project is formally confirmed by the two major stakeholders Fortescue
and Decmil. The deliverables of the accommodation village includes a 1600 double story
transportable accommodation units, which provides guests with communal dining facilities
and tavern, sports oval, a 100 seat cinema, an external ba
ecue and sports facilities, which
include a three lap lane pool, tennis
asketball court, gym, indoor cricket, golf driving range
(Karntama Village Christmas Creek XXXXXXXXXXThe major work performance is described in the
deliverables section will be directly performed by the stakeholders mentioned in the
following table.
Stakeholder Analysis
It is evident in any process of project management that stakeholders are a major key to the
development of a project in terms of the physical construction, financial funding or in any
way ‘exert influence over the project and its deliverables’ (Hartley XXXXXXXXXXThey have the
power and complete control to either contribute to the outcome of the project or benefit from
it. In terms of the major stakeholders that are involved in the development, they all have
similar traits in terms of contributing their time and resources into designing, shaping and
producing a highly recognisable accommodation area (Gido and Clements XXXXXXXXXXThe
following table demonstrates the major stakeholders that could be extracted from the
information, in which was analysed in terms of their nature as a stakeholder and their key
oles and responsibilities throughout the project.
Table 1: Stakeholder analysis (Hartley 2009)
Name Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilities
Decmil Australia Owne
Project Organisation Implements business
objectives to fit project
criteria of Fortescue
Fortescue Metals Group Client/Sponso
Commercial
Suppliers
Provide funding, resource
allocations and initiate
approvals in relation to what
Decmil
ing about
Scott Criddle (Decmil Aust.) Project Manager Manages the overall
implementation of Karntama
Village in order to be
successful and lead the
project in the right direction
Accommodated Guests
(Mining Employees of FMG)
Customers/End Users The initial back-end users to
utilize the project when
completed – target market of
the mining construction
workers
Scope Australia Project Management Team Provide project management,
engineering and design
services in which supports
Decmil as their ‘right-hand
man’
KORE Construction Project Team Members Provide civil works,
formwork, reinforcing,
precast and concrete
placement and finishing –
eport to project manager
Monford Group Project Team Members Provide services of their
project managers, estimators,
engineers and tradesmen to
support Decmil
R-Group International Project Team Members:
Manufacturers/Commercial
Suppliers
Delivered impeccable
accommodation
entertainment
Answered 2 days After Sep 08, 2022

Solution

Deblina answered on Sep 10 2022
74 Votes
PROJECT ANALYSIS REPORT: ADELAIDE O-BAHN BUSWAY
Executive Summary
This report critically analyses the Adelaide O-Bahn Busway and the completion of the project and the effectiveness of the project in the Australia. It has effectively contemplated with the importance of the project and have affectively identified the potential aspects that has contemplated on the infrastructure of the Adelaide region of Australia. The project has also effectively contributed towards the proper aspects and have also contributed words the collaborative team environment of the project. The success of the project was effective and genuine delivery and outstanding piece of infrastructure and demonstrate the engineering excellence across all faces. It also contributes towards a highly integrated collaborative engineering and construction approach with an effective focus on innovation and multi-disciplined infrastructure outcomes for the community and the daily passengers of the Adelaide region. 
Table of Contents
Introduction    4
Stakeholder Analysis    4
Strategy Used & Key Events    5
Project Management    5
Critical Analysis of the Project Outcome    5
Conclusion & Recommendation    7
References    8
Appendix    9
Introduction
The Adelaide O-Bahn Busway of the Northeast region is a 12 km long project which was initially 3 km when it was started and is a part of the rapid transit system that services the Adelaide region of South Australia. This particular project was a concept by Daimler Benz that enabled the buses to avoid traffic congestion and sharing of the tram tunnels. This particular project started in 1986 that expanded rapidly in the North Eastern part of the Subu
an region of Adelaide and provided a combination of the transport network for bus and rail systems. This particular project guides 18 different routes that converge from the Northeast subu
an areas before entering the interchanges.
This particular project was completed in 1989 as the first full-scale application of the guided busway technology in the world. This facility was built instead of light rail transit which proved to be a more effective and efficient solution than the previously planned LRT system (Bray et al., 2019). The project was able to use large vehicles that have greater capacity and ensured more comfortable right for the commuters and operate effectively within the entire region of Adelaide. This particular project operates the world's fastest guided bus way of 12 km at 100 km per hour.
Stakeholder Analysis
The stakeholders of the project refer to the entity and the individuals who have been associated with the project and have been affected by the outcome as well as during the proper functioning of the project. Stakeholders must be effectively identified and managed because they have the power to influence the project and impact its success of the project. The principal stakeholders of this particular project of the O-Bahn busway of Adelaide were the sponsors. Sponsors of the project were the government who concerted with the German authorities and the State Transport authority engineers of Australia (Fre
arch et al., 2020).
There were other stakeholders who had immensely contributed to the project that includes the staff, subcontractors, suppliers, and the general public. Given this was a full skull government project the report provided a holistic and coordinated approach for the consultation strategy in terms of planning and communication with the stakeholders. The stakeholders also included the local community and had an effectively impacted as the community members felt comfortable to make an inquiry and express their opinions about the ideas relating to the project. With...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here