KAA 110 - Engineering Statics
Lab Task 3: Reactions, Internal Forces and Moments of Beams
Report due date: Two (2) weeks from date of lab session
Objective
ï‚· To observe the behavior of a beam subject to external forces
ï‚· To predict the reactions of the beam under different load cases
ï‚· To evaluate these predictions by comparing with measured values
ï‚· To use effective engineering communication by clearly and concisely expressing
technical information
Equipment
ï‚· Scales
ï‚· Supports
ï‚· A 4m plank
ï‚· Tape measure
Experimental Procedure
(1) Zero each scale (with all loads being removed from the scales)
(2) Weigh two team members (P1 and P2), and record the body weights.
Record all loads, load positions and reactions for the following load cases:
(3) Load Case 1: Measure the beam self weight by resting two ends of the beam on two
supports over the scales (the summary of the readings from the scales is the weight of
the beam and the supports).
(4) Load Case 2: Have team member one (P1) load the beam at the ¼ point.
(5) Load Case 3: Have team member one (P1) load the beam at the ¼ point and the second
team member (P2) load the beam at the ¾ point.
(6) Load Case 4: If only one person (P1) is loading the beam, determine the location of P1 to
make the reaction R1 = 40kg.
(7) Load Case 5: Rea
ange one support so that it is beneath the 3/5 point of the beam.
Have one team member (P1) at the 1/2 point of the beam and determine the location of
a second team member (P2) on the cantilever portion so that the reaction at the othe
end of the beam is just zero.
Analysis
For load case 1:
ï‚· Make a good sketch of the apparatus, ensuring that you define a coordinate system, all
dimensions and all forces.
ï‚· From the reaction forces, estimate the weight of the beam and supports and suggest
where it could be assumed to act.
For load cases 2 - 5:
ï‚· Make a good sketch of the apparatus, ensuring that you define a coordinate system, all
dimensions and all forces.
ï‚· From the known loads, predict the two reactions.
ï‚· Compare the predicted and measured reactions.
ï‚· Please draw shear force and bending moment diagrams of each load case, consider the
eam self-weight as a UDL.
Report
Refer to the Ru
ic (for Lab 3). One individual lab report is required per student; group reports
are not permitted. Electronic submission via Mylo only by the due date. Pdf or Doc format
only.
Please ensure the following:
ï‚· Follow the supplied ru
ic when preparing your reports – this will help you maximize
your marks.
ï‚· The report needs to be well organised and well structured, including headings, sketches,
figures and tables as appropriate.
KAA 110 - Engineering Statics Marking Ru
ic
Lab 3: Reactions, Internal Forces and Moments
Student Name: ________________________________________ Student Number:_________________________________________
Criteria 80-100% 65-80% 50-65% 0-50%
1. Apply standard
test procedures,
60%
Accurately calculate the predicted
esults based on the selected
coordinate system and equili
ium
equations.
Clearly interpret the measured
esults
Accurately calculate the differences
etween the predicted and
measured values and clearly present
your comparison in a table
Calculate the predicted results
ased on the selected coordinate
system and equili
ium equations.
Interpret the measured results
Calculate the differences between
the predicted and measured values
E
or in predicted or measured
esults but not both
Some insight into measured results
given
Unexpectedly large e
ors identified
E
or in predicted and measured
esults or results missing
Little insight given into measured
esults
2. Present report
in a professional
manner,
40%
Co
ectly list any assumptions and
factors that may contribute to
differences between predicted and
measured values
Test apparatus clearly sketched and
other diagrams to appropriate scale,
all well labelled
Concisely discuss observations
Co
ectly use language without
spelling and grammar e
ors
List most important assumptions
and factors which contribute to
differences between predicted and
measured values
Provide a sketch of the test
apparatus and some additional
diagrams, all well labelled
Observations discussed with most
important points covered
Minimal spelling and grammar
e
ors
Important assumptions not listed or
some inco
ect assumptions listed
A sketch is provided, but
information is missing or the sketch
is poorly presented
Some meaningful observations
made
Written work can be understood but
has spelling e
ors or poor grammar
Inco
ect assumptions listed or
assumptions not listed
Sketch not presented or of not
legible
Observations not discussed
Sections of written work cannot be
understood.