Critical Thinking: Lean Operations (130 points)
Evaluate the implications for operations management in organizations that operate internationally.
For this assignment, you will select and assess the same type of product from two different firms,
such as an SUV vehicle from Toyota, and BMW. (NOTE: You cannot use the automotive industry,
so pick another industry that operates internationally)
In a 6-page paper, defend the organizations’ production processes, customer interaction in those
processes, if applicable, and the technologies used in production. Judge each organization’s
commitment to quality and excellence, as well as the process used for measuring quality. Describe
each of the selected organization’s inventory methodologies and model(s), and any areas for
improvement. Describe each of the selected organization’s movements toward lean processes or
Six Sigma, and how these impact the culture, efficiency, and success of each organization. Finally,
compare and contrast each company’s production processes, customer interactions in those
processes, and technologies used in production.
Be sure to use at least two cu
ent, scholarly references beyond any required course readings.
Cu
ent sources are those published within the most recent five-year period, and scholarly sources
are those from peer-reviewed journals.
Make certain for each listed reference that you have at least one supporting citation in the body of
your content. Your reference page is always the last page of the submission where all individual
eferences get listed. The Saudi Digital Li
ary is a good resource to search for these references.
Submit your presentation into the Assignment Dropbox.
MGT530
Critical Thinking Writing Ru
ic - Module 14
Exceeds
Expectation
Meets Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence
Content, Research, and Analysis
25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points
Requirements Exceeds
Expectation -
Includes all of the
equired
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
Meets Expectation
- Includes most of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
Below Expectation
- Includes some of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
Limited Evidence -
Includes few of the
equired
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
29-35 Points 22-28 Points 15-21 Points 8-14 Points
Content Exceeds
Expectation -
Demonstrates
substantial and
extensive
knowledge of the
materials, with no
e
ors or major
omissions.
Meets Expectation
- Demonstrates
adequate
knowledge of the
materials; may
include some
minor e
ors or
omissions.
Below Expectation
- Demonstrates fair
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes some
major e
ors or
omissions.
Limited Evidence -
Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes many
major e
ors or
omissions.
37-45 Points 28-36 Points 19-27 Points 10-18 Points
Analysis Exceeds
Expectation -
Provides strong
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Meets Expectation
- Provides
adequate thought,
insight, and
analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Below Expectation
- Provides poor
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Limited Evidence -
Provides little or no
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points
Sources Exceeds
Expectation -
Sources go above
and beyond
equired criteria,
and are well
chosen to provide
effective
substance and
perspectives on
the issue under
examination.
Meets Expectation
- Sources meet
equired criteria
and are adequately
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
Below Expectation
- Sources meet
equired criteria,
ut are poorly
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
Limited Evidence -
Source selection
and integration of
knowledge from
the course is
clearly deficient.
MGT530
Critical Thinking Writing Ru
ic - Module 14
Mechanics and Writing
5 Points 4 Points 3 Points 1-2 Points
Demonstrates
college-level
proficiency in
organization,
grammar and
style.
Exceeds
Expectation -
Project is clearly
organized, well
written, and in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Strong
sentence and
paragraph
structure; contains
no e
ors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
eferences.
Meets Expectation
- Project is fairly
well organized and
written, and is in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.
Reasonably good
sentence and
paragraph
structure; may
include a few
minor e
ors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
eferences.
Below Expectation
- Project is poorly
organized and
written, and may
not follow proper
format as outlined
in the assignment.
Inconsistent to
inadequate
sentence and
paragraph
development,
and/or includes
numerous or major
e
ors in grammar,
spelling, APA style,
or APA citations
and references.
Limited Evidence -
Project is not
organized or well
written, and is not
in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Poor
quality work;
unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
spelling, APA style,
and APA citations
and references.
Total points possible = 130
Critical Thinking14
SEU_MGT530_CTWritingRu
ic_Mod14