700156 Crime, Deviance and Society | Annotated Bibliography Template
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
Students are to use this template if they are using the case R v Mulvihill (domestic violence) and Gender to focus on.
PART A | You must annotate the news article linked to Module 8 – Gender Theory.
You are required to annotate this article. You may use the court hearing to further your knowledge and understanding of the case study (cite accordingly)
News Article | Phillips, J., 2014, ‘Domestic violence: Rachelle Yeo's father urges men to address 'national human rights disaster'’ in ABC News, May 6, available at https:
www.abc.net.au/news/ XXXXXXXXXX
achelle-yeos-father-pleads-for-change/5427002?section=nsw
Court hearing | R v Mulvihill [2014] NSWSC 443, 16 April 2014
Your annotation should consist of a succinct description of the case study and concisely evaluate connections to the theoretical framework
(Approx. 250 words)
PART B | Research and annotated ONE scholarly (academic) source. This source must NOT be the set reading or the given court hearing/article linked to the essay question.
Source (Using Harvard Referencing WSU Guide )
insert your Harvard reference for Part B here
Your annotation should consist of a succinct summary of the scholarly (academic article) and concisely evaluate its content and relevance to the case study and the appropriate theoretical framework.
(Approx. 250 words)
700156 Crime, Deviance and Society
MARKING RUBRIC: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
CRITERIA 1 FAIL PASS CREDIT DISTINCTION HIGH-DISTINCTION
PART A
Provide a succint annotation of
the appropriate case
study/article (25%)
Fails to clearly summarise the
appropriate case study.
Many features of the annotation are
missing.
Case study description is generic,
not specifically identifying key
features and makes loose
connections to the theoretical
framework
Case study is succinctly described and
covers the key features. Includes limited
engagement with the theoretical
framework and makes some general
connections to the theoretical framework
Case study is summarised with most
of the key contents. Includes clear and
explicit connections to the theoretical
framework. This may be done
inconsistently.
Case study is concise and
precisely identifies connections to
the theoretical framework This is
done consistently.
CRITERIA 2 FAIL PASS CREDIT DISTINCTION HIGH-DISTINCTION
PART B
Provide a succint annotation of
an independently chosen
source (35%)
Source cited IS not scholarly.
Source is scholarly but does not relate to
the co
ect theoretical framework or case
study
Many features of the annotation are
missing.
Source is scholarly and
oadly to
theoretical framework.
Basic understanding of the key
features is presented
Identifies key features and makes
loose connections to the
theoretical framework
Source is scholarly and
oadly
connects to theoretical framework.
Annotation succinctly covers the key
features.
Includes limited engagement with the
theoretical framework and makes some
general connections to the theoretical
framework.
Source is scholarly and connects to
the theoretical framework.
Features of the annotation are all
present & explicitly recorded in
succinct detail.
Includes clear and explicit connections
to the theoretical framework. This may
e done inconsistently.
Source is scholarly and connects to
theoretical framework
Evidence of deep understanding of
the source is conveyed in the
detailed & thoughtful analysis of
content
Annotation is concise and precisely
identifies connections to the
theoretical framework
CRITERIA 3 FAIL PASS CREDIT DISTINCTION HIGH-DISTINCTION
WRITTEN EXPRESSION
Capacity to Communicate
Ideas effectively (20%)
Outside of word-limit.
Written expression generally unclear,
with frequent
grammatical/spelling/punctuation and
sentence construction e
ors.
Academically unsuitable informal
expression. Meaning of the response
difficult to read/follow.
Within word-limit.
Clarity of written expression
adequate, although elements are
present throughout which make
the meaning less clear. These
may include: - spelling and
punctuation; - sentence structure
and order (syntax); - sentence
grammar and informal expression.
Meaning of the response generally
able to be followed although some
aspects unclear and detract from
the whole response.
Within word-limit.
Clarity of written expression consistent,
with good attempt at formal academic
writing style - no colloquial language
present. Meaning is largely clear and
easily followed, with occasional lapses.
Response has been proof-read, with
infrequent and minor spelling,
punctuation, grammar and/or
construction e
ors which do not detract
from the whole response.
Within word-limit.
Clarity of written expression
consistent, with formal academic
writing style present. Meaning is clear
and easily followed, with very few
lapses. Response has been proof-
ead, with infrequent and minor
spelling, punctuation, grammar and/or
construction e
ors
Within word-limit.
Sophisticated academic writing
style with varied articulation of
ideas and clarity of meaning.
Response has been skilfully proof-
ead and prepared with care and
attention to detail.
CRITERIA 4 FAIL PASS CREDIT DISTINCTION HIGH-DISTINCTION
REFERENCING & CITATIONS
Uses the Harvard WesternSydU
eferencing guide as instructed
in the Learning Guide (20%)
WSU Harvard Style absent or very
minimally and inco
ectly attempted.
Citations/acknowledgements absent or
minimally attempted and inco
ectly
applied. Reference list absent or
minimally applied/directly copied from
non-compliant source. Internet sources
absent or inco
ectly cited.
Attempt at WSU Harvard Style.
Inconsistencies in citing
paraphrased or quoted material.
Some attempt at providing
co
ectly formatted reference list.
Some attempt at referencing
Internet sources.
Compliance with WSU Harvard Style,
with some minor inconsistencies in
eferencing and citations. Paraphrasing
consistently acknowledged, and
co
ectly cited with only minor
inconsistencies. All sources, including
Internet sources, mostly co
ectly cited
in Reference list.
Compliance with WSU Harvard Style,
with consistently co
ect referencing
and citations. All quotations and
paraphrasing acknowledged, and
co
ectly cited. All sources, including
Internet sources, co
ectly cited in
Reference list.
Complete compliance with WSU
Harvard Style, with consistently
co
ect referencing and citations.
All quotations and paraphrasing
skilfully acknowledged, and
co
ectly cited. All sources,
including Internet sources, co
ectly
cited in Reference list.