Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

This group assignment requires you to critically evaluate a real-world project. You need to select a real-world project that has sufficient information available in the public domain. Then you need to...

1 answer below »

Fundamentals of Project Management

Assessment-2
Group case study-Week 8

    Assessment – 2

Group project report
    


40%
    In groups of no more than 3, students will analyse a Case Study from a project management perspective (1000 words per student).

This group assignment requires you to critically evaluate a real-world project. You need to select a real-world project that has sufficient information available in the public domain. Then you need to go beyond the ‘iron triangle’ and research what factors contribute to success or failure of a project in the project management literature and practice. You need to conduct an examination of the chosen project case study and report your findings in the following format:

1. Background of the project that you have selected.
2. Discussion of standard criteria, such as the Iron Triangle or those emerging from the sources mentioned in the references or beyond.
3. Critical identification and justification of the criteria you think is appropriate
4. Critical analysis of the case project based on the criteria chosen. For example, why the project was able or unable to meet the success criteria? How the project success criteria support organizational strategy?
5. Presentation of appropriate conclusions on what factors led to the success/failure of the project.
6. Provision of suggestions or recommendations in the event that the project should be rerun in the future.

You need to present your analyses in the shape of a formal business report and submit as a pdf on Moodle. The report should be written in clear, plain language, so that non-expert users can easily understand it. The report must be properly constructed, it should contain all the necessary parts that a report is required to have. Include all relevant documents and support materials [if required] in an appendix. All sources quoted in your report should be co
ectly referenced and included in the reference. No minimum or maximum number of references – cite the necessary sources (references) to support your arguments.

Useful References: (you can use these references to get started)
AGARWAL, N. & RATHOD, U XXXXXXXXXXDefining ‘success’ for software projects: An exploratory revelation. International journal of project management, 24, XXXXXXXXXX.
ALBERT, M., BALVE, P. & SPANG, K XXXXXXXXXXEvaluation of project success: a structured literature review. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business.
ATKINSON, R XXXXXXXXXXProject management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International journal of project management, 17, XXXXXXXXXX.
COOKE-DAVIES, T XXXXXXXXXXThe “real” success factors on projects. International journal of project management, 20, XXXXXXXXXX.



https:
www.sixsigmadaily.com/five-of-the-biggest-projects-in-the-world/ Select a project from these 5 projects
Fundamentals of Project Management – Group Case study
Assessment-2 Ru
ic    (40% of total mark)
Student Name
    Criteria
    Well developed
    Project background
    Provides an excellent project background & presents relevant information about the case study
    (5 Marks)
    
    Discussion of the standard criteria
(10 Marks)
    Discussion of the criteria including iron triangle and some relevant criteria emerging from the literature
    Creativity &
Innovation
(2 Marks)
    Includes a variety of graphics, text, and animation that exhibits a sense of wholeness.
    Writing style & referencing
(10 Marks)
    Information is well organized. With a
strong professional
layout, includes Executive
Summary, Table of
Contents, Headers /
Footers, Appendices, etc. Within word count. Very well written and with
proper grammar / punctuation throughout.
    
    
    
    Conclusion
    Presentation was very clear and appropriate conclusion on what factors led to the success/failure of the project
    
    
    
    (8 Marks)
    
    
    
    
    Suggestion &
Recommendation
(5 Marks)
    Suggestions are supported by the literature and discussions.
Recommendations are very clear and appropriate.
    
    
    
    Total
    40
Answered 5 days After Sep 18, 2022

Solution

Ayan answered on Sep 21 2022
64 Votes
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT
Table of contents
Introduction    3
Background    3
Discussion of standard criteria    4
Analysis of the case project    6
Conclusion    7
Recommendations    8
References    10
Introduction
Sky City 1000's advancement has been expected since 1989. It is guessed that it will surpass Dubai's Burj Khalifa as the world's tallest tower. It has been viewed as an overall city with its own inhabitants, hotels, offices, malls, and various other facilities. It would be the world's first really extraordinary homestead, with sufficient space for in excess of 100,000 individuals to reside there. Another u
an local area will be established on an infrastructure that works toward the establishment of humanistic communities and advances in industrial structures and innovation for the next century in the 1000-meter-high vertical u
an local area known as Sky City 1000. Despite the fact that they are recognizable topics, the upward use of u
an space and the preservation of nature remain essential issues.
Background
Cities have started raising sky creepers in ongoing decades for various reasons, remembering the scarcity of space for swarmed cities, the chance to procure much from the upward construction by leasing or selling space, or to demonstrate the strength of a country's economy. Tokyo's population growth from the previous 100 years till the present has considerably outperformed that of other congested metropolises like New York City or London, and the shortage of space in the Tokyo metropolitan locale appears to be developing, prompting a significant issue with traffic, expensive leases, and so on. Because of this, Japanese engineers thought of the splendid idea of growing massively upward as opposed to continuing on developing on a level plane. Building the 1000-meter-tall Tokyo Sky City 1000 was the idea put out in 1989, and it stayed the world's highest structure right up 'til now (Al-Kodmany, 2018). In excess of 100,000 individuals would reside in the tall, vertical metropolis, which would also be home to the first sky homesteaders ever. Sky City 1000 is an ambitious mix of residential housing, business office space, and a tourist destination that is poised to become one of the world's highest structures. The 1,000-meter-tall Takenaka Construction Co., Ltd. tower is wanted to have 14 aeronautical bases, or Space Plateaus, layered on top of each other to make a design masterpiece. Each space plateau will be designed to oblige business offices, public spaces like cinemas, and neighborhood necessities like stores and schools. As per the present proposal, 100,000 individuals will work there and 35,000 individuals will live there full-time. The design, which was first presented in 1989, also calls for novel trains to service each space plateau, as well as triple-decked, fast elevators. Safety assessments and concerns are also being started. The amazing Sky City 1000 has been highlighted in numerous publications since its unique origination in 1989 by the Takenaka Corporation. In the past ten years, its prominence kept on developing further and was even highlighted in numerous documentaries all over the planet, including a couple for the Science/Discovery Station, which is where I initially caught wind of it back in 2003.Sky City 1000 was projected to be the next development in cities as it was to be turned into a super skyscraper beyond anything we have even today. This means that it would have supported more than 160,000 individuals inside its massive structure, including malls, food courts, parks, and entertainment centers.
Discussion of standard criteria
Tokyo is the most evolved metropolis nea
y, with a populace of around 13 million. Absence of building space, an absence of greenery in the city, and outrageous traffic are a couple of issues that surface. The typical extended population of Tokyo spends 5 years just getting to and from work, and the film is basically based on the off chance that heading out to work in Tokyo could take 2-4 hours per day (Cheung & Jim, 2019). Then, at that point, a Japanese improvement group concocted a solution to get around this. They are approved to construct an elevated metropolis! Takenaka Corporation calls for a city that is two times as tall as cu
ent skyscrapers. It could at first have all the earmarks of being just another skyscraper, yet it has several oddities that set it apart. The three towers that make up this metropolis are joined by a suspended core structure. With its enormous level, it would surpass the Burj Dubai (800 m) to become the tallest skyscraper in the world. It would also be the highest structure with a supported concrete construction, making it solid for hundreds of years. A skyscraper with an establishment that is 1000 meters high and 400 meters wide and an all-out area of 8 square kilometers is remembered for the proposal. Somewhere in the range of 35,000 and 36,000 full-time individuals abide there, alongside 100,000 employees. It consists of 14 sunken "Space Plateaus" that are put one on top of the other. Green space would be situated inside the plateaus, and apartments would be situated along the borders and sides of the structure. The structure would also house offices, retail establishments, educational institutions, theaters, and other contemporary conveniences. The position of the super structural components on the layout's fringe, while its plants are developed such that they are intruded on each ten plants,
oadcasting some substantial core landscaping areas, stands out the most. There are 14 such plant groupings, or "plateaus space," as their designers allude to it.
At the level of the Japanese asset price bu
le, it was disclosed in 1989. The design calls for a structure that is 8 km2 in size, 1,000 m tall and 400 m wide at the base. The Takenaka Corporation's 1989 a
angement called for somewhere in the range of 35,000 and...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here