RISK MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION
Task 2 is a report that you convey your research methodology to your readers. In general, methodology refers to definitions of academic questions, ways of answering those questions with academic rigour, and reasons why you think those answers can be valid.
We engineers normally ca
y out “empirical research”, that is to say, we try to propose solutions with “empirical evidence”. Such empirical evidence is consider as “data”. It might be easier for students who are doing scientific and social research projects to find the relevance of the notion of “data” to this task.
There are 4 components required in this task:
· Definition of what is regarded as “data”, empirical evidence or design parameters etc. in your problem solving (refer to the above explanation)
· Explanation of what is the method of data collection and how the data can be interpreted (this component ask you to explain to your reader on what is your data? how you are going to get that information? what do you think about its validity? (e.g can you believe in everything you read from a magazine?)
· Construction of a theoretical framework of problem solving (a logical
ational way of thinking of the cause effect relationship) that justify the approach and process of problem solving (For example, if you are going to ca
y out an evaluative study about the pros and cons of a technology and your research is based on ca
ying out some lab experiments, you need to explain why the experiments are “designed” like that way. Saying other people have done the same does not justify the reason why you are doing it. You can be inspired by others but you need to be specific about your project in the sense that why such a way of answering your research question is appropriate. )
· Literature review of relevant research/publications (use “high quality” references.)
A structure of writing is proposed for you as such:
· Research Question(s)/Object of Design
· Literature Review: how other people interpret or answer these questions. (Existing Designs)
· Two types of literature review: Descriptive and Critical.
· Methodology/Design process:
· What is your data?
· Method of data collection?
· You can have some literature review about the methodology here.
· Discussions : Discuss the validity issues here.
· Data
· Findings
· Potential findings: Discuss how your research findings/object of design might be looked like, and how you are going to interpret those.
Written communication features:
· Critical analysis and synthesis
· Appropriate academic language
· Well structured (presentation and organisation) and co
ect referencing