This 2,000 word individual report is to investigate the problem of employee theft in hotels. This problem is a constraint unique to the management of international hospitality companies. Given the easy access to physical resources in hospitality, this is a perennial and pertinent problem facing the dynamic hospitality industry. This assignment will help develop your awareness and understanding of the features and complexities of employee theft in the hospitality industry
format
Report, 2000 words (+/- 10%), MSWord, Times New Roman 12pt font, 1.5 spacing
Unit learning outcomes:
ï‚· Demonstrate an awareness of the nature and characteristics of a global hospitality enterprise.
ï‚· Critically analyse the constraints unique to the management of international hospitality enterprises.
PREPARATION
Before starting this assignment, you should have read all assessment materials provided on Blackboard and consulted with your Lecturer for additional instructions and support. Please refer to the marking ru
ic for this proposal on Blackboard to see marking criteria and achievement expectation.
ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
For this assignment you are required to conduct a literature review on employee theft in the hotel industry. You will be required to produce an individual report which contains the following information:
1. Discuss how and if employee theft is a problem in the hotel industry.
2. Discuss how employee theft is a problem across different departments.
3. Discuss the underlying motivations behind employee theft in hotels.
4. Discuss the types of employee theft in hotels (e.g. intentional vs unintentional, tangible vs intangible, etc).
5. Discuss best practices adopted by international hotels to prevent employee theft
6. Provide practical recommendations on how employee theft can be managed effectively
The submitted document should be 2000 words (+/- 10%) – excluding references, cover page, executive summary and appendices. Referencing should be in the APA Style (see Resources below for Tip Sheet). The report must be suitably referenced with a minimum of 10 academic references and may include photographs, maps, tables, diagrams, illustrations.
Any student who wishes to defer the submission of an assignment must apply to the lecturer before the due date for an extension of the time within which to submit the assignment. The application must be in writing and must set out the grounds on which extension is sought.
An assignment submitted after the fixed or extended time for submission shall incur a penalty to be calculated as follows: ï‚·
where the assignment is submitted not more than 5 working days late, the penalty shall, for each working day that it is late, be 5% of the maximum assessment available for the assignment; o
ï‚· where the assignment is more than 5 working days late, a mark of zero shall be awarded.
RESOURCES Apart from the references provided above, students should be conducting secondary research using the ECU li
ary database
RESOURCES Apart from the references provided above, students should be conducting secondary research using the ECU li
ary database
fail
Pass
Credit
Distinction
High distinction
Quality of analysis of employee theft motivation and types of theft (50%)
Analysis is inadequate and/or very limited. Fails to show insight and thoughtful discussion of topic.
Analysis is basic
Shows some insight and provides some thoughtful discussion of the topic.
Analysis is good.
Shows good insight and provides a sound discussion of the topic
Analysis is very good.
Shows very good insight and provides a strong discussion of the topic
Analysis is excellent.
Shows excellent insight and provides great depth in discussion of the topic.
Quality of analysis of employee theft in relation to international hospitality (20%) (CLO 5.1)
Analysis is inadequate and/or very limited. Fails to show depth of thought and understanding of topic and/or discussion of all key concepts.
Analysis is basic.
Shows some depth of thought and adequate understanding of the topic and/or discussion of all key concepts
Analysis is good.
Shows good depth of thought and sound understanding of the topic and/or discussion of all key concepts.
Analysis is very good.
Shows very good depth of thought and strong understanding of the topic and/or discussion of all key concepts.
Analysis is excellent.
Shows great depth of thought and excellent understanding of the topic and/or discussion of all key concepts
Quality of practical recommendations (20%) (CLO 5.2)
Analysis is inadequate and/or very limited. Fails to show depth of thought and understanding of topic and/or discussion of all key concepts
Analysis is basic.
Shows some depth of thought and adequate understanding of the topic and/or discussion of all key concepts
Analysis is good.
Shows good depth of thought and sound understanding of the topic and/or discussion of all key concepts.
Analysis is very good.
Shows very good depth of thought and strong understanding of the topic and/or discussion of all key concepts
Analysis is excellent.
Shows great depth of thought and excellent understanding of the topic and/or discussion of all key concepts
Referencing technique (10%)
Referencing is inadequate.
In-text referencing is limited and/or inco
ect and/or plagiarism is evident. End-text referencing is inco
ect and/or references are missing.
Referencing is adequate but a number of e
ors are present. In-text referencing has e
ors. End-text referencing has e
ors. More work is required to adhere to ECU referencing guidelines
Referencing is good but some e
ors are present. In-text and/or end-text referencing has some e
ors as per ECU Referencing guidelines which need to be addressed
Referencing is very good.
There may be some minor e
ors in the intext and/or endtext referencing as per ECU Referencing guidelines which need to be addressed
Referencing is excellent.
In-text and endtext referencing all conforms to ECU Referencing guidelines