Great Deal! Get Instant $10 FREE in Account on First Order + 10% Cashback on Every Order Order Now

Submit your detailed question here... Document Preview: Business Ethics Loren Vranich, a doctor practicing under the corporate name Family Health Care, P.C., entered into a written employment contract...

1 answer below »
Submit your detailed question here...
Document Preview:

Business Ethics Loren Vranich, a doctor practicing under the corporate name Family Health Care, P.C., entered into a written employment contract to hire Dennis Winkel. The contract provided for an annual salary, insurance benefits, and other employment benefits. Another doctor, Dr. Quan, also practiced with Dr. Vranich. About nine months later, when Dr. Quan left the practice, Vranich and Winkel entered into an oral modification of their written contract whereby Winkel was to receive a higher salary and a profit-sharing bonus. During the next year, Winkel received the increased salary. However, a disagreement arose, and Winkel sued to recover the profit-sharing bonus. Under Montana law, a written contract can be altered only in writing or by an executed oral agreement. Dr. Vranich argued that the contract could not be enforced because it was not in writing. Does Winkel receive the profit-sharing bonus? Did Dr. Vranich act ethically in raising the defense that the contract was not in writing? Winkel v. Family Health Care, P.C., 205 Mont. 40, 668 P.2d 208, Web 1983 Mont. Lexis 785 (Supreme Court of Montana) 10.7  HYPERLINK "http://online.vitalsource.com/books/ XXXXXXXXXX/content/id/pglossary-5" Acceptance Peter Andrus owned an apartment building that he had insured under a fire insurance policy sold by J. C. Durick Insurance (Durick). Two months prior to the expiration of the policy, Durick notified Andrus that the building should be insured for $48,000 (or 80 percent of the building’s value), as required by the insurance company. Andrus replied that (1) he wanted insurance to match the amount of the outstanding mortgage on the building (i.e., $24,000) and (2) if Durick could not sell this insurance, he would go elsewhere. Durick sent a new insurance policy in the face amount of $48,000, with the notation that the policy was automatically accepted unless Andrus notified him to the contrary. Andrus did not reply. However, he did not pay the premiums on...

Answered Same Day Dec 22, 2021

Solution

Robert answered on Dec 22 2021
121 Votes
Running Head: BUSINESS LAW 1
Business Law
Running Head: BUSINESS LAW 2
Business Ethics
Winkel vs. Family Health Care
In the case of Winkel v. Family Health Care P.C., the starting contract was legal based
and also it was enforceable contract. On the basis of the case, it could be stated that yes, Winkel
has right to receive the profits-sharing bonus. It is because of the law that is used in that state
where this contract has been taken place. Hence, according to the state law, Winkel has a right to
get the shares as a bonus of profit. At the same time, the written contract does not state anything
elated to the raising in paying or sharing of profits (Monahan, 2001). Unluckily, the written
contract of family health care (FHC) had been performed by the oral modification that gave the
ights under the state act that FHC should hold in its cu
ent form, it means that FHC must accept
its oral obligation.
No, the act of Dr. Vranich was totally ethically because Dr. was fessing to one character
of oral modification for paying higher salaries to Winkel. The act of Dr. Branch was ethical
ased for raising the defense. It is because that the modification was based on oral character and
it was partly executed. It was totally legal because the State also allows to execute the oral
agreement....
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here